179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

RE: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)

15 messages · 11 participants · spans 3 days · search this subject
2000-03-11 06:12(idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
└─ 2000-03-11 22:38marsel Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
2000-03-12 13:10Kelley Hackett RE: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
2000-03-13 10:09rob salls RE: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
2000-03-13 10:20Simon Walley Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
2000-03-13 13:44drift wood Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
└─ 2000-03-13 13:47Paul Robinson Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
2000-03-13 17:21Kelley Hackett RE: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
2000-03-13 17:30Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
├─ 2000-03-13 17:41Adam Huffman Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
└─ 2000-03-13 18:32marsel Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
2000-03-13 19:59Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
2000-03-13 20:58Michael Upton RE: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
2000-03-14 11:09Simon Walley Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
└─ 2000-03-14 17:35Irene McC Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-03-11 06:12AeOtaku@aol.comI would say the Good Old Days of IDM probably started with Kraftwerk and Manuel Gottsching
From:
To:
Date:
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 01:12:09 EST
Subject:
(idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <16.1acb5b4.25fb3db9@aol.com>
I would say the Good Old Days of IDM probably started with Kraftwerk and Manuel Gottsching and ended with the break up of the Black Dog, but they are definitely concentrated from the time of "Strings of Life" and "Night Drive" to the first albums of B12, As One, Black Dog, etc. before their later work. So about 1987-1993. As always I disagree with the Jet Jaguar about music (I don't think we've ever agreed on anything) and I pretty much hate the later material of Kirk, Carl, Plaid, etc. not so much because of the music itself (which doesn't bother me) but the fact that these guys don't make tracks like "Nebula Variation", "How the West Was Won" or "Scoobs In Columbia" anymore. Now I do realize I can't (and have no right) to tell them what to as artists but I still hate their current material. This is true of just about every producer I liked who has "old" material. It seems in these scene nobody gets better: they just get worse. In reality they get more developed and gather moss down the abstract hill, but I prefer the pure techno sound (and think I am not alone). On another note, someone out there with connections and money: there is an extremely lucrative and ethically rewarding market for legitimate reissues. There have been a lot of people e-mailing me lamenting that these tracks we're speaking so highly of aren't available anymore. One person put it best when they said that it sucks to hear about the greatest IDM tracks to know he'll never get the chance to hear them. Hey, anybody in the UK, talk to B12, talk to Kirk, talk to Nuron, talk to Black Dog, get some clearance and make some nice discography CD's of old singles and reissue some albums and comps. On another note, however, in the past year I have seen all of these available (most not more than once or twice): Everything on A.R.T. Everything on B12 Everything on 100% Pure Everything on Ifach Everything from Black Dog / Plaid Everything on Likemind Everything on Void Everything on Otherworld Virtually everything in the old Detroit scene etc. etc. etc. etc. So for those with time and money and dedication, they still go up out there. But obviously there just aren't enough especially for those who haven't heard the tracks and aren't slamming down months of looking and piles of cash.... Matt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-11 22:38marselAt 11-3-00 -0500 01:12, you wrote: >I would say the Good Old Days of IDM probably >started
From:
marsel
To:
Date:
Sat, 11 Mar 2000 23:38:17 +0100
Subject:
Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
Reply to:
(idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <4.3.0.20000311231851.00acb450@pop3.demon.nl>
At 11-3-00 -0500 01:12, you wrote:
quoted 20 lines I would say the Good Old Days of IDM probably>I would say the Good Old Days of IDM probably >started with Kraftwerk and Manuel Gottsching and >ended with the break up of the Black Dog, but they >are definitely concentrated from the time of "Strings >of Life" and "Night Drive" to the first albums of B12, >As One, Black Dog, etc. before their later work. >So about 1987-1993. As always I disagree with the >Jet Jaguar about music (I don't think we've ever agreed >on anything) and I pretty much hate the later material >of Kirk, Carl, Plaid, etc. not so much because of the music >itself (which doesn't bother me) but the fact that these >guys don't make tracks like "Nebula Variation", "How the >West Was Won" or "Scoobs In Columbia" anymore. Now >I do realize I can't (and have no right) to tell them what to >as artists but I still hate their current material. This is true >of just about every producer I liked who has "old" material. >It seems in these scene nobody gets better: they just get >worse. In reality they get more developed and gather moss >down the abstract hill, but I prefer the pure techno sound (and >think I am not alone).
i think we should respect the things an artist does, and if you don't like their current output, move on to those who you like - and if the current output at all isn't that fine, there's too much old music to explore. that music still moves on, personally i would like to tip nubian mindz, as it got pretty much a string/melancholic sound, and also the aardvarck release got a pretty detroit, urban tribe-like sound - not to forget shake's father ep and the future beat alliance releases last year. otherwise check the stuff by guy called gerald like 'reno' and 4hero's parallel universe album, all with a fine detroit sound and about the music, matter of taste i think - personally i think planetary folklore and message.. are kirk degiorgio finest albums as i agree kirk did some great things as as one, and some very great as future/past - but i got the feeling the music he's putting out, is more up to using all his capabilities the first things called idm were all in the tradition of detroit techno, b12 probably as most easy example. / the things now being called idm are more started by things as aphex twin and autechre below some nice quotes from kirk from an interview (late '96!) / __ http://www.forcefield.org/kirk.html As more artists your sound has enbroaden itself, more jazz and funk influences. Has this to do with this tag 'intelligent techno', a sort identity crisis or just creativism and pure logical progression? "I've been listening to soul and jazz since I was 11 years old and I was DJing by the age of 15 - techno was just another section of Black Dance Music that I liked - and certainly the most obvious for me to make (available technology, open-ended forward thinking music in the jazz spirit)." "If you listen to Reflections - my first album - you will see the beginnings of the use of breaks along with the minimal techno beats and soulful strings - as my music progresses and my studio expands so does my creative capabilities. As long as I keep experimenting and exploring then I'm happy - too many artists stop when they find a commercially viable sound and lose the urge to try out new things." In an article, you wrote 'It seem drum 'n bass has injected some much needed funk & soul back into electronic music'. What are your main influences nowadays, also besides music? "My main influences now are still soul and jazz. Drum n Bass gave the dance scene such much needed energy and vitality after the dirge of too much average ambient-techno. But commercialism has damaged jungle as much as it did techno - only a handful of jungle artists are doing anything outside the mainstream - and there are too many ex-techno artists treating jungle as a gimmick resulting in frantic programming at high bpms but with little or no GROOVE which is what attracted me to jungle in the first place." What's your meaning about the current state of 'techno', worldwide as well in the UK? "Techno worldwide is an embarrassment - its like what disco became at the end of the seventies - tacky, formulated - dominated by big clubs and big name DJs who've had their day - the people who matter have all moved on to different and better things. Detroit will always have an underground to keep the true spirit of techno alive, but good releases are too few to keep me interested. I must be the only so called 'techno' producer in the world to own NO techno records." ||| cheers marsel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-12 13:10Kelley Hackettha ha....Matt, I like You for some reason......Well said fella... and here is the reason w
From:
Kelley Hackett
To:
,
Cc:
marsel
Date:
Sun, 12 Mar 2000 08:10:16 -0500
Subject:
RE: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <397CA68ABF5AD111863C00805F0DDE980E312C@aba.iupui.edu>
ha ha....Matt, I like You for some reason......Well said fella... and here is the reason why, you gave a solution, at least regarding bringing back some of the older music...and this is what is needed...although the IDM artist have progressed on to different sounds, it doesn't mean that it cant be just as warm, creative, and for a lack of a better term shocking......but yes, it does seem that many artist have not maintained the quality of sound that they previously had...case in point.....John Beltran......Earth & Nightfall, for me, very nice, very nice initial CD(almost from beginning to end).......Placid......So sweet, oh so sweet( and this is what made me REALLY like JB, he did it AGAIN), and then you have 10 Days of Blue........Fantastic, Brilliant, and a sound that no one else really came close to producing....after that well........ As the saying goes, "if isn't broke dont fix it"! I agree with Matt on re-releasing all the older stuff from Detroit and that "Nuron school" as I like to call it.....also, but as well, some artist on the list and off it should try to carry the Music on....sorta like the idea of B12 with Detroit..........as you see, the music now doesn't even compare with the music then(but you do get nice tunes every once in a while).....and this would be the way for say a 4th/5th generation of artists to emerge representing that lush, warm, soulful, melodic and wonderful sound...... And yes, Drift, Row. (and you others over in the UK) tell em, tell em---especially Stasis......dont leave us to this drudgery!!!!!!!!! Sincerely, Hk! -----Original Message----- From: AeOtaku@aol.com [mailto:AeOtaku@aol.com] Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2000 1:12 AM To: idm@hyperreal.org Subject: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified) I would say the Good Old Days of IDM probably started with Kraftwerk and Manuel Gottsching and ended with the break up of the Black Dog, but they are definitely concentrated from the time of "Strings of Life" and "Night Drive" to the first albums of B12, As One, Black Dog, etc. before their later work. So about 1987-1993. As always I disagree with the Jet Jaguar about music (I don't think we've ever agreed on anything) and I pretty much hate the later material of Kirk, Carl, Plaid, etc. not so much because of the music itself (which doesn't bother me) but the fact that these guys don't make tracks like "Nebula Variation", "How the West Was Won" or "Scoobs In Columbia" anymore. Now I do realize I can't (and have no right) to tell them what to as artists but I still hate their current material. This is true of just about every producer I liked who has "old" material. It seems in these scene nobody gets better: they just get worse. In reality they get more developed and gather moss down the abstract hill, but I prefer the pure techno sound (and think I am not alone). On another note, someone out there with connections and money: there is an extremely lucrative and ethically rewarding market for legitimate reissues. There have been a lot of people e-mailing me lamenting that these tracks we're speaking so highly of aren't available anymore. One person put it best when they said that it sucks to hear about the greatest IDM tracks to know he'll never get the chance to hear them. Hey, anybody in the UK, talk to B12, talk to Kirk, talk to Nuron, talk to Black Dog, get some clearance and make some nice discography CD's of old singles and reissue some albums and comps. On another note, however, in the past year I have seen all of these available (most not more than once or twice): Everything on A.R.T. Everything on B12 Everything on 100% Pure Everything on Ifach Everything from Black Dog / Plaid Everything on Likemind Everything on Void Everything on Otherworld Virtually everything in the old Detroit scene etc. etc. etc. etc. So for those with time and money and dedication, they still go up out there. But obviously there just aren't enough especially for those who haven't heard the tracks and aren't slamming down months of looking and piles of cash.... Matt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-13 10:09rob sallsthe black dog ep on bdr(92)or 91? , I don't think you have seen that. Plus retroactive wil
From:
rob salls
To:
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 10:09:23 GMT
Subject:
RE: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <20000313100923.200.qmail@hotmail.com>
the black dog ep on bdr(92)or 91? , I don't think you have seen that. Plus retroactive will never rerelease anything ever again, cause they and I believe it was an important time and that was then and never now... thanks ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-13 10:20Simon Walley>-----Original Message----- >From: AeOtaku@aol.com [mailto:AeOtaku@aol.com] >Subject: (idm
From:
Simon Walley
To:
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 02:20:58 PST
Subject:
Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <20000313102058.63448.qmail@hotmail.com>
quoted 14 lines -----Original Message----->-----Original Message----- >From: AeOtaku@aol.com [mailto:AeOtaku@aol.com] >Subject: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified) > >On another note, someone out there with connections and >money: there is an extremely lucrative and ethically rewarding >market for legitimate reissues. There have been a lot of people >e-mailing me lamenting that these tracks we're speaking so >highly of aren't available anymore. One person put it best when >they said that it sucks to hear about the greatest IDM tracks to >know he'll never get the chance to hear them. Hey, anybody in >the UK, talk to B12, talk to Kirk, talk to Nuron, talk to Black Dog, >get some clearance and make some nice discography CD's of >old singles and reissue some albums and comps.
Its not going to happen for a number of reasons: * Most of the artists concerned just aren't interested in re-visiting areas they've already explored, both in terms of writing new material in that style or releasing/re-releasing older tracks. If they did it, it would probably only be if they were tempted with large amounts of money, which would be unlikely to be made back purely from re-issues. * Despite what you might say, the overall demand for it is NOT high, it is not a lucrative thing to do. There might be quite a few IDM kids who would buy it (lets guess a few hundred?) but there needs to be enough non-hardcore fans (these are the people who buy the bulk of a release) to buy it and make it worthwhile re-pressing. * Some of this material has been re-released already (eg. ART stuff by New Electronica). How many times can you do retrospective re-releases? * This sound (Detroit influenced UK sound) is not 'current'. A lot of kids on this list are probably wondering who the fuck B12 are and why (if they're so good), they haven't appeared on a V/Vm compilation. The only reason to re-issue deleted things like this is if demand (and I mean general, overall demand, not just hardcore IDM demand) and interest reaches a certain level AND most importantly if the artist wants to do it. And the bulk of them don't want to. Its a shame but they have no interest in visiting the past again. However, some do - watch this space :) || [CiM] || cim@headspacerecordings.co.uk || - ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-13 13:44drift wood--- Simon Walley <cim_@hotmail.com> wrote: > The only reason to re-issue deleted things li
From:
drift wood
To:
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 13:44:11 +0000 (GMT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <20000313134411.4608.qmail@web1106.mail.yahoo.com>
--- Simon Walley <cim_@hotmail.com> wrote:
quoted 11 lines The only reason to re-issue deleted things like this is if demand> The only reason to re-issue deleted things like this is if demand > (and I > mean general, overall demand, not just hardcore IDM demand) and > interest > reaches a certain level AND most importantly if the artist wants to > do it. > And the bulk of them don't want to. Its a shame but they have no > interest in > visiting the past again. > > However, some do - watch this space :)
Let me guess - you've persuaded Steve Pickton to dig out some old un-released stuff and you're gonna release it on Focus? Anyway, I agree with your general point, people like Kirk Di Giorgio and Plaid would prefer that we concentrate on their new stuff as I'm sure that they think it's far superior. And who knows, in another 8 years when we look back, we may be agreeing with them (and probably saying 'how come those pladlads don't release something as sublime as Shackbu any more....'). Matt. ____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-13 13:47Paul RobinsonIsn't Aphex supposed to have a huge backlog of unreleased material waiting to see the ligh
From:
Paul Robinson
To:
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 13:47:50 +0000
Subject:
Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
Reply to:
Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <3.0.5.32.20000313134750.007f9220@mailgate.team17.com>
Isn't Aphex supposed to have a huge backlog of unreleased material waiting to see the light of day? Personally I don't think it matters so long as it sounds new and fresh, having said that I quite like the sound of old recordings, it's something you can't always re-create. Paul. At 13:44 13/03/00 +0000, you wrote:
quoted 36 lines --- Simon Walley <cim_@hotmail.com> wrote:> > >--- Simon Walley <cim_@hotmail.com> wrote: >> The only reason to re-issue deleted things like this is if demand >> (and I >> mean general, overall demand, not just hardcore IDM demand) and >> interest >> reaches a certain level AND most importantly if the artist wants to >> do it. >> And the bulk of them don't want to. Its a shame but they have no >> interest in >> visiting the past again. >> >> However, some do - watch this space :) > >Let me guess - you've persuaded Steve Pickton to dig out some old >un-released stuff and you're gonna release it on Focus? > >Anyway, I agree with your general point, people like Kirk Di Giorgio >and Plaid would prefer that we concentrate on their new stuff as I'm >sure that they think it's far superior. And who knows, in another 8 >years when we look back, we may be agreeing with them (and probably >saying 'how come those pladlads don't release something as sublime as >Shackbu any more....'). > >Matt. >____________________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk >or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-13 17:21Kelley HackettAt least we get some response.....sorry for spelling your name incorrectly CiM! Unfortunat
From:
Kelley Hackett
To:
'Simon Walley '
Cc:
'idm@hyperreal.org'
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 12:21:05 -0500
Subject:
RE: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <397CA68ABF5AD111863C00805F0DDE9808D000@aba.iupui.edu>
At least we get some response.....sorry for spelling your name incorrectly CiM! Unfortunately, all these cats are in it for the LOOT!(!!$#@$#@$#&%). I wont rant and rave now, $#@!!!%#!#@$@%), but which chap said artist should make tracks because they have a passion for the music...Yeah Yeah, we all have to eat(make money)..... Some have the Love for it, and some DONT.......So Fuck'em, We'll Churge on! And for those who dont know about B12, theres a large portion residing in the UK, ASK SOME FUCKING BODY! Hey CiM, what about releasing your music on CD, is there enough Demand for That!? Shitty as hell on my day off, Hk! -----Original Message----- From: Simon Walley To: idm@hyperreal.org Sent: 3/13/00 5:20 AM Subject: Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
quoted 14 lines -----Original Message----->-----Original Message----- >From: AeOtaku@aol.com [mailto:AeOtaku@aol.com] >Subject: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified) > >On another note, someone out there with connections and >money: there is an extremely lucrative and ethically rewarding >market for legitimate reissues. There have been a lot of people >e-mailing me lamenting that these tracks we're speaking so >highly of aren't available anymore. One person put it best when >they said that it sucks to hear about the greatest IDM tracks to >know he'll never get the chance to hear them. Hey, anybody in >the UK, talk to B12, talk to Kirk, talk to Nuron, talk to Black Dog, >get some clearance and make some nice discography CD's of >old singles and reissue some albums and comps.
Its not going to happen for a number of reasons: * Most of the artists concerned just aren't interested in re-visiting areas they've already explored, both in terms of writing new material in that style or releasing/re-releasing older tracks. If they did it, it would probably only be if they were tempted with large amounts of money, which would be unlikely to be made back purely from re-issues. * Despite what you might say, the overall demand for it is NOT high, it is not a lucrative thing to do. There might be quite a few IDM kids who would buy it (lets guess a few hundred?) but there needs to be enough non-hardcore fans (these are the people who buy the bulk of a release) to buy it and make it worthwhile re-pressing. * Some of this material has been re-released already (eg. ART stuff by New Electronica). How many times can you do retrospective re-releases? * This sound (Detroit influenced UK sound) is not 'current'. A lot of kids on this list are probably wondering who the fuck B12 are and why (if they're so good), they haven't appeared on a V/Vm compilation. The only reason to re-issue deleted things like this is if demand (and I mean general, overall demand, not just hardcore IDM demand) and interest reaches a certain level AND most importantly if the artist wants to do it. And the bulk of them don't want to. Its a shame but they have no interest in visiting the past again. However, some do - watch this space :) || [CiM] || cim@headspacerecordings.co.uk || - ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-13 17:30AeOtaku@aol.comIn a message dated 3/13/00 5:21:42 AM Eastern Standard Time, cim_@hotmail.com writes: << *
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 12:30:27 EST
Subject:
Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <97.2ec5db5.25fe7fb3@aol.com>
In a message dated 3/13/00 5:21:42 AM Eastern Standard Time, cim_@hotmail.com writes: << * Most of the artists concerned just aren't interested in re-visiting areas they've already explored, both in terms of writing new material in that style or releasing/re-releasing older tracks. If they did it, it would probably only be if they were tempted with large amounts of money, which would be unlikely to be made back purely from re-issues. * Despite what you might say, the overall demand for it is NOT high, it is not a lucrative thing to do. There might be quite a few IDM kids who would buy it (lets guess a few hundred?) but there needs to be enough non-hardcore fans (these are the people who buy the bulk of a release) to buy it and make it worthwhile re-pressing. >> Those are two of the saddest reasons I've ever heard not to reissue anything. CiM, I think you and I had this discussion before, and I brought up Underground Resistance and the other Detroit labels who keep everything in print. It shouldn't have anything to do with money, it should have to do with great music, and whether or not 5,000 people want to buy it: that's why we have pressing sizes. It's also not like the artists have a lot to do with the record. Just ask them for their permission to put it out, bang, that's that. If the Detroit labels hadn't kept things in print, think how many people out there would have never heard stuff on Transmat, Metroplex, UR, etc. etc. This self-nullifying Kafka-esque notion of letting work disappear is ridiculous. Matt --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-13 17:41Adam HuffmanOn Mon, 13 Mar 2000, AeOtaku@aol.com wrote: > * Despite what you might say, the overall de
From:
Adam Huffman
To:
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 17:41:50 +0000
Subject:
Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
Reply to:
Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <20000313174150.Q8556@pc036.manbio.man.ac.uk>
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, AeOtaku@aol.com wrote:
quoted 13 lines * Despite what you might say, the overall demand for it is NOT high, it is> * Despite what you might say, the overall demand for it is NOT high, it is > not a lucrative thing to do. There might be quite a few IDM kids who would > buy it (lets guess a few hundred?) but there needs to be enough non-hardcore > fans (these are the people who buy the bulk of a release) to buy it and make > it worthwhile re-pressing. >> > > Those are two of the saddest reasons I've ever heard > not to reissue anything. CiM, I think you and I had this > discussion before, and I brought up Underground Resistance > and the other Detroit labels who keep everything in print. > It shouldn't have anything to do with money, it should have > to do with great music, and whether or not 5,000 people > want to buy it: that's why we have pressing sizes. It's also
I think the point Simon is alluding to here is the parochial tendencies of this list. Yes, you have people posting that they'd buy reissues of whatever, but in reality you're only talking about a couple of hundred people at best. More of a question of not wanting to lose money, than seeking to make lots of money.
quoted 7 lines not like the artists have a lot to do with the record. Just> not like the artists have a lot to do with the record. Just > ask them for their permission to put it out, bang, that's that. > If the Detroit labels hadn't kept things in print, think how > many people out there would have never heard stuff on > Transmat, Metroplex, UR, etc. etc. This self-nullifying > Kafka-esque notion of letting work disappear is ridiculous. >
On one of the other occasions when this topic has appeared, the impossibility of obtaining all the Art/Music/etc. you want was pointed out. If labels can keep all their releases in print then good for them, but that doesn't mean that labels who can't or won't should (necessarily) be condemned. Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-13 18:32marselAt 13-3-00 -0500 12:30, you wrote: >In a message dated 3/13/00 5:21:42 AM Eastern Standard
From:
marsel
To:
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 19:32:09 +0100
Subject:
Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
Reply to:
Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <4.3.0.20000313192144.00aaf830@pop3.demon.nl>
At 13-3-00 -0500 12:30, you wrote:
quoted 31 lines In a message dated 3/13/00 5:21:42 AM Eastern Standard Time, cim_@hotmail.com>In a message dated 3/13/00 5:21:42 AM Eastern Standard Time, cim_@hotmail.com >writes: > ><< > * Most of the artists concerned just aren't interested in re-visiting areas > they've already explored, both in terms of writing new material in that > style or releasing/re-releasing older tracks. If they did it, it would > probably only be if they were tempted with large amounts of money, which > would be unlikely to be made back purely from re-issues. > > * Despite what you might say, the overall demand for it is NOT high, it is > not a lucrative thing to do. There might be quite a few IDM kids who would > buy it (lets guess a few hundred?) but there needs to be enough > non-hardcore > fans (these are the people who buy the bulk of a release) to buy it and > make > it worthwhile re-pressing. >> > >Those are two of the saddest reasons I've ever heard >not to reissue anything. CiM, I think you and I had this >discussion before, and I brought up Underground Resistance >and the other Detroit labels who keep everything in print. >It shouldn't have anything to do with money, it should have >to do with great music, and whether or not 5,000 people >want to buy it: that's why we have pressing sizes. It's also >not like the artists have a lot to do with the record. Just >ask them for their permission to put it out, bang, that's that. >If the Detroit labels hadn't kept things in print, think how >many people out there would have never heard stuff on >Transmat, Metroplex, UR, etc. etc. This self-nullifying >Kafka-esque notion of letting work disappear is ridiculous.
i agree somewhat with matt on this one. money couldn't be an issue for repressings, as you can do a re-press of 500 copies or some - drop them at a distributor and probably they will sell. a label has nothing to be happy about with hand-to-hand auction prices, although maybe it could work out fine on image building (hence markant or mask). don't know what reasons could be - but most of all we can't force labels, artists whatever to do so, to do what we like. if someone put a record in 100 copies like mask, it's their choice and of course you can find it pretty dissappointing and all that, but i think we should respect that all i can say is that lots of stuff pops up now and then, and that you shouldn't pay to ridiculous prices (although again, you also should decide for yourself of course..) - last saturday i heard rumours about a repress of the old black dog things, as one four pack. - maybe someone just made a joke.. . --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-13 19:59TheevilD@aol.com> On one of the other occasions when this topic has appeared, the > impossibility of obtai
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 14:59:14 EST
Subject:
Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <c8.2532f58.25fea292@aol.com>
quoted 5 lines On one of the other occasions when this topic has appeared, the> On one of the other occasions when this topic has appeared, the > impossibility of obtaining all the Art/Music/etc. you want was pointed > out. If labels can keep all their releases in print then good for them, > but that doesn't mean that labels who can't or won't should > (necessarily) be condemned.
Goddammit, I think I just spotted the ethos behind the tendancy towards minimal print runs... sorry to anyone I slagged for doing it in the past. It's kind of Buddhist (apologies to any genuine Buddhists who understand that religion and know that its nothing of the sort): the point is that we get hung up on hearing everything. We have to hear every release from Fax or Skam or whoever, and we're willing to pay hundreds of pounds to do so, rather like the way you compulsively check every record in the bargain bin in case the next one's twoism. In any case, this is a bad thing. We should be sufficiently relaxed to enjoy what music we can get, and let the rest go. Frankly, unless my premium bonds come up, I'll never 'complete' my record collection, but I shouldn't let not owning Lego Feet worry me: far better to enjoy my latest Mille-Plateau. By limiting their releases, labels give us a choice between accepting this fact or becoming totally screwed up. Hopefully we can all choose the former. It also reduces the possibility that when IDM hits a lull, we all just live in perpeptual 1992 until things get better: we should be forced to search out, or even create, something new. I suppose one final goal (note the argument becoming confused as the post develops) is a kind of cottage industry utopia: making all scenes from something national or regional into something totally personal: this ties up with the idea of letting things go: we shouldn't worry about missing an Autechre show up north, because we're having a hoedown round the ol' 303 with our local IDM geniuses. RDJ has complained that he's not particularly interesting, its just everyone else being totally boring, and we should all take steps to remedy this. By releasing limited print runs, the companies are trying to avoid the market becoming dominated by their stuff... its easy to conceive an ambient scene going the same way as populist DJs who all have to play Crowd Say Bo or whatever in every set they do. This wouldn't happen if Positiva limited their releases to about five. Although that would be a good thing anyhow. Thanks for bearing with me. Jorkens --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-13 20:58Michael Upton>===== Original Message From AeOtaku@aol.com ===== >It shouldn't have anything to do with
From:
Michael Upton
To:
Date:
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:58:32 -0500
Subject:
RE: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <38D0FC88@MailAndNews.com>
quoted 1 line ===== Original Message From AeOtaku@aol.com =====>===== Original Message From AeOtaku@aol.com =====
quoted 3 lines It shouldn't have anything to do with money, it should have>It shouldn't have anything to do with money, it should have >to do with great music, and whether or not 5,000 people >want to buy it: that's why we have pressing sizes.
You've made the assumption that the artists agree with you that the music in question is great (or even worth hearing). Given all the changes in style and direction that have been mentioned, would it really surprise you if some of those older outfits were at best apathetic about people hearing their old material? *shrug* Anyway, this is all entirely hypothetical... this list aren't the people who need convincing. Michael np. 'The Remote Viewer LP' - The Remote Viewer -+- Jet Jaguar MP3s http://mp3.com/jetjag/ -+- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-14 11:09Simon Walley>From: AeOtaku@aol.com >Subject: Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified) > >Those are two
From:
Simon Walley
To:
Date:
Tue, 14 Mar 2000 03:09:38 PST
Subject:
Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <20000314110938.3098.qmail@hotmail.com>
quoted 7 lines From: AeOtaku@aol.com>From: AeOtaku@aol.com >Subject: Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified) > >Those are two of the saddest reasons I've ever heard >not to reissue anything. CiM, I think you and I had this >discussion before, and I brought up Underground Resistance >and the other Detroit labels who keep everything in print.
But they don't - they keep records in print that there is demand for. There are lots of earlier records that Submerge do not keep in print for either lack of demand reasons, that are deleted (eg. SID releases) or that they just don't want to re-press anymore (eg. URs _Fury_ - they replaced the catalogue number with a new record).
quoted 3 lines It shouldn't have anything to do with money, it should have>It shouldn't have anything to do with money, it should have >to do with great music, and whether or not 5,000 people >want to buy it: that's why we have pressing sizes.
Re-issues of music (I'm assuming the artist concerned is like Stasis or B12 - ie. not Aphex or whoever) in such a niche genre like IDM are not going to sell that many copies. Okay - so lets only press 100. Thats such a small amount for a pressing plant to handle, the unit cost is going to be high for everything (vinyl, artwork, sleeves). This extra cost ripples through the distributor to the shops. So then you have a high cost re-issue selling alongside cheaper, new releases in a shop. You were arguing that this music should get out to people who wouldn't normally hear it - a run of 100 over-priced records is not the way to do it.
quoted 3 lines It's also>It's also >not like the artists have a lot to do with the record. Just >ask them for their permission to put it out, bang, that's that.
Most of them will say no. They aren't interested in this music being released and being associated with them anymore. Some are and still love that style of music. Most have moved on into different areas. And assuming they say yes - they might want a lot to do with the re-issue. They originally chose the artwork, the tracks, the running order - its their baby. Of course they're going to want input on how re-issues are going to be handled. They're also probably now used to working with bigger labels and so the first thing they are going to want is an advance.
quoted 4 lines If the Detroit labels hadn't kept things in print, think how>If the Detroit labels hadn't kept things in print, think how >many people out there would have never heard stuff on >Transmat, Metroplex, UR, etc. etc. This self-nullifying >Kafka-esque notion of letting work disappear is ridiculous.
Whatever. Its down to the artist/label concerned. If they want to do re-issues then great. Two points: * Most of them don't. Flinging money at them is (unfortunately) sometimes one way of getting them to change their mind. However... * ...re-issues in IDM are not going to make much money. Therefore paying for the records (and to make back all the money you threw at the artists) is going to be tricky. If there is sufficient demand (what Submerge work to) then its financially worthwhile. Otherwise its not. I know you have loftier interests than financial ones but to do a record, people need to be paid (the artist, for one). The record needs to sell. Ethically, you'll get a warm glowy feeling from putting it out but losing a grand and owing people money might dim the glow a bit. A final thought: as much as I love this music, if I had enough money to do re-issues of other artists music, I still wouldn't do it. Theres too much good new music and new artists about. Thats more exciting to me and, I guess, most other labels operating. || [CiM] || cim@headspacerecordings.co.uk || - ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-14 17:35Irene McCOn 14 Mar 00, Simon Walley wrote re Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quanti: > A final thought
From:
Irene McC
To:
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 14 Mar 2000 19:35:46 +0200
Subject:
Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
Reply to:
Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
permalink · <E12UvBb-0007oC-00@smtp03.iafrica.com>
On 14 Mar 00, Simon Walley wrote re Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quanti:
quoted 3 lines A final thought: as much as I love this music, if I had enough money to do> A final thought: as much as I love this music, if I had enough money to do > re-issues of other artists music, I still wouldn't do it. Theres too much > good new music and new artists about.
Hear hear. I completely agree with this statement - there's lots of wonderful music around that I love from ca. '94-ish, but I obsessively hoard NEW music... (don't we all). I * --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org