I know this is a really nerdy question but does anyone ever use more than
8MB on a track. I certainly haven't and i've never known anyone who has
needed more even if they have 2 or 3 samplers running with 20 outputs. Why
do people need the 128MB + sample RAM they have on all the new EMU's and
AKAIs?
BTW the original EMAX is absolutely amazing it has an analogue filter I was
going to buy one really cheaply but the person reallised that he was selling
it for too little.
There is an EMU III XP or SP for sell, i can't remember what it is called
exactly. Does anyone know much about it? What is the difference between it
and the standard Emulator III?
quoted 4 lines whatever works.
> whatever works.
>
> i think the akai range sound good. none of the current samplers on the
> market score a 10, not even an 8. the akai's have great transientquoted 1 line the filters are o.k., but it was the ram expandability that sold me the
> the filters are o.k., but it was the ram expandability that sold me thequoted 1 line S5/6's over the new emus. not quite the same sort of possibilities as
> S5/6's over the new emus. not quite the same sort of possibilities asquoted 18 lines the filter matrix on the emus, but even they still don't score high in
> the filter matrix on the emus, but even they still don't score high in
> fidelity in my book.
>
> it's all a matter of what you do with them.
>
> want a great sounding sampler, look for a EMAX II. outstanding filter!
> minimal sampling time even when they are maxed out with (gasp) 8megs, but
> they sing.
>
> dE3
>
> www.polyrhythmic.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>
>