179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) silly lfo ?

4 messages · 4 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1996-02-27 11:54(idm) silly lfo ?
1996-02-27 15:10Aran M. Parillo Re: (idm) silly lfo ?
1996-02-27 18:19Dave Walker Re: (idm) silly lfo ?
1996-02-28 07:40Oh, I see. Re: (idm) silly lfo ?
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-02-27 11:54AJSOLOMON@EAGLE.WESLEYAN.EDUhello all again, It is me andi, with another naive question...I hadn't heard of lfo until
From:
To:
Date:
27-FEB-1996 11:54:02.73
Subject:
(idm) silly lfo ?
permalink · <01I1PGUUGQBM8Y6U7T@EAGLE.WESLEYAN.EDU>
hello all again, It is me andi, with another naive question...I hadn't heard of lfo until I got onto hyperreal. I've been trying to find Advance around where I live(w/o any luck) so I wont have to pay for postage, but I did run into a copy of LFO Frequencies (I think that's what it was called). Is this cd good as well? I think it was from 19992 or 1993, what does it sound like? Idm? the tracks seems quite short, so for some reason that made me assume it was more of a dancey/techno type record than ambient-esque/emotional idm. anywya, I don't have much $ , and I was thinking about gettting it and wondering if any lfo fans out there could help me out with info/input :) you guys are my only source. thanx as always andi
1996-02-27 15:10Aran M. ParilloFrom: "Dave Walker" <marmoset@mich.com> : I would call LFO's _Frequecies_ one of the true
From:
Aran M. Parillo
To:
Date:
Tue, 27 Feb 96 15:10:31
Subject:
Re: (idm) silly lfo ?
permalink · <9602272008.AA28244@MIT.MIT.EDU>
From: "Dave Walker" <marmoset@mich.com> : I would call LFO's _Frequecies_ one of the true classic techno albums. : It's an immaculately constructed bleep record, not a clonk : out of place. I haven't heard _Advance_ yet, so I can't compare them, I have heard both and believe you me...you do NOT want to compare them. Teep
1996-02-27 18:19Dave Walkerandi said: :I did run into a copy of LFO Frequencies (I think :that's what it was called).
From:
Dave Walker
To:
IDM List
Date:
27 Feb 96 13:19:22 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) silly lfo ?
permalink · <AD58B561-2A1C2@198.108.17.24>
andi said: :I did run into a copy of LFO Frequencies (I think :that's what it was called). Is this cd good as well? I think :it was from 19992 or 1993, what does it sound like? Idm? :the tracks seems quite short, so for some reason that made me assume it :was more of a dancey/techno type record than ambient-esque/emotional :idm. anywya, I don't have much $ , and I was thinking about gettting it and :wondering if any lfo fans out there could help me out with info/input :) I would call LFO's _Frequecies_ one of the true classic techno albums. It's an immaculately constructed bleep record, not a clonk out of place. I haven't heard _Advance_ yet, so I can't compare them, but the impression I've gotten is that _Advance_ hews closer to the current IDM "mainstream" -- i.e. longer tracks, polyhytms, etc. That's all well and good, but what made _Frequecies_ so special to me was it's purity: all muscle/no fat -- tight, economical grooves, bubblicious low-end and retro-futurism that paid homage to the likes of Kraftwerk & YMO. For an example, listen to the track "Freeze". There's not a single extra note there, every particle of sound seems like it was placed there by a sculptor. So, um, yeah, I like it. -- dave walker, detroit art services marmoset@mich.com
1996-02-28 07:40Oh, I see.> > I have heard both and believe you me...you do NOT want to compare them. I'm not sure i
From:
Oh, I see.
To:
Date:
Wed, 28 Feb 1996 08:40:14 GMT+1
Subject:
Re: (idm) silly lfo ?
permalink · <5C6FBCA508B@gribb.hsr.no>
quoted 2 lines I have heard both and believe you me...you do NOT want to compare them.> > I have heard both and believe you me...you do NOT want to compare them.
I'm not sure if this was meant as a negative comment (that is, Advance can't be compared to Frequencies; the latter is majestic and things can't really be done any better :), but I still can't help being a bit disappointed with "Advance". The overall sound of the record is *very* clean, and I kind of miss the grunge (!?) that first made their sound (a sound that Tied Up - a track of pure excellence, by the way - sort of maintains). Too many tracks on Advance sound too familiar - I know I've heard it all before - and some of their textures are nothing more than your average ambient wishy-washy. Not to say there aren't any good tracks on it, and it may be that five years of waiting has made me expect too much, but the overall feeling, as I said, is that of disappointment.
quoted 2 lines Teep> Teep >
/Oivind Idso/