179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Kent williams
To:
Adam Piontek
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 17 Aug 2001 10:48:05 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: [idm] 'timeless' music (was Re: NIN?)
Msg-Id:
<Pine.HPP.3.96.1010817103806.496A-100000@arthur.avalon.net>
In-Reply-To:
<20010817153032.59777.qmail@web13807.mail.yahoo.com>
Mbox:
idm.0108.gz
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Adam Piontek wrote:
quoted 3 lines I hate to say this, but I really don't think that NIN> I hate to say this, but I really don't think that NIN > or even Coil will still be remembered or thought of > much a few hundred years from now.
Coil has a better chance than NIN, of course, because it's better music. But think about how few artists in popular music from the 1920s has any current interest. It's Duke Ellington, Louis Armstrong, and maybe Bix Beiderbeck (who is probably unknown unless you're either a complete jazz nut or from Iowa). Compare that to the thousands of people who made records back then. When I was a kid adults were gaga over swing music from the 40's. that was maybe 20 years after the fact. Now that generation is starting to die off and all sorts of people that were household names are languishing in obscurity. Right now, the crap I listened to in high school is the staple for oldies stations. People generally are obsessed with what they listened to in their teens, which is what they imprint on. I'm probably an exception in that I've been obsessed with whatever is new and cool. No one my age even hears my favorite stuff as musical... my wife's famous line when she heard something i was listening to is "is there something wrong with the stereo?" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org