179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
lw94ben
To:
Date:
Mon, 23 Oct 1995 12:35:05
Subject:
Re: NME
Msg-Id:
<Q08B8BF9@ccss-35>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.OSF.3.91.951020145646.5309A-100000@cpca5.uea.ac.uk>
Mbox:
idm.9510.gz
quoted 3 lines People, either believe the Rephlex version of events or>> People, either believe the Rephlex version of events or >> believe NME, we can't be bothered to explain this any more and don't think >> it matters.
quoted 6 lines Yeah - like when the NME revealed about the new 'Richard James'>Yeah - like when the NME revealed about the new 'Richard James' >EP, under his new 'alias' of Bochum Welt... It's the same sort of >NME-shitness that gives rise to errors such as calling Ectomorph >'Ectoplasm' and citing one of Carl Craig's aliases as Atypic. It's just >slackness - and these are the supposed techno experts like Ben Willmot >writing too...
The NME make me laugh sometimes. Remember when they said that Daniel Pemberton was one of Orbital? Or that Carl Craig was the "boss of Red Planet records"? :) Brendan Nelson Lost Transmission From Uxbridge