179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
CiM
To:
rephlex
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 20 Oct 1995 15:04:32 +0100 (BST)
Subject:
Re: idm V1 #267
Msg-Id:
<Pine.OSF.3.91.951020145646.5309A-100000@cpca5.uea.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To:
<199510201009.AA06164@felix.dircon.co.uk>
Mbox:
idm.9510.gz
On Fri, 20 Oct 1995, rephlex wrote:
quoted 3 lines People, either believe the Rephlex version of events or> People, either believe the Rephlex version of events or > believe NME, we can't be bothered to explain this any more and don't think > it matters.
Yeah - like when the NME revealed about the new 'Richard James' EP, under his new 'alias' of Bochum Welt... It's the same sort of NME-shitness that gives rise to errors such as calling Ectomorph 'Ectoplasm' and citing one of Carl Craig's aliases as Atypic. It's just slackness - and these are the supposed techno experts like Ben Willmot writing too...
quoted 1 line btw, Thanks for your kind response to our packaging.> btw, Thanks for your kind response to our packaging.
Well I know it's uncool to care about packaging and stuff ("it's the *music* that matters"), but uncovering a clear sleeve in the record rack with an embossed Rephlex logo stamped on the side is one of lifes true pleasures :) || [CiM] || s.walley@uea.ac.uk || http://www.sys.uea.ac.uk/~u9323899/