179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Robert Feuchtl
To:
idm list
Date:
Tue, 02 Nov 2004 18:39:06 +0100
Subject:
Re: [idm] what's wrong with Apple
Msg-Id:
<4187C63A.8030302@groove.de>
In-Reply-To:
<009d01c4c101$3101dbf0$0d0114ac@iansony>
Mbox:
idm.0411.gz
:D can I hug you?? .... * * * . . . .. but, I do admit was considering tatooing an ATARI-logo on my forhead. seriously. /!\ATARI - power without the price robert Ian Monroe wrote:
quoted 235 lines Now, see, this is what I'm talking about.>Now, see, this is what I'm talking about. > >The Cult of Mac - the Cult of Jobs. > >I use both Apple and PC machines, in a variety of capacities, and I've >used every windows version since 3.1, every macOS version since 7.0, and >a wide variety of *nix OS's. I currently support a mixed platform >network that's about 70% PC, 20% mac, and about 10% Debian. > >The fact of the matter is that Nicholas pointed out valid problems with >the Mac platform, and immediately the evangleical mac users rush to >argue. > >I know, from personal experience, that there are large >incompatabilities, particularly with pre-OSX macs, and other computers. >There were huge network problems. The Appletalk protocol is one of the >ugliest, least effiecient protocols around. There's even >incompatabilites with file systems - Try using a PC to burn a CD of >files that are stored on an HFS partition. Can't be done. > >There IS a premium for apple hardware - you're essentially paying for >design. And while that may be fine for some people, I find it grossly >inefficent. The "affordable" eMacs and entry level powerbooks you >mention are so far back on the hardware curve as to be ridiculous. Your >$999 powerbook is going to need to be replaced in 2 years, if you hope >to use anything more computationally advanced that word processing and >interweb. Your $999 commodity PC laptop has twice that life. > >And there are whole categories of problems that come up with Macs that >simply have no solution, ever. I could name a litany of them that I've >encountered personally, but I don't want to bore you any further than I >have already. > >But here's the thing that gets me the most. 20% of the machines that I >support are Macs, and they demand well over half of the support time. >But every mac user I talk to tries to tell me Macs don't crash. Well, >they do. All the time. Not as much with OSX, but as far as I'm >concerned, it's too little too late. I've wasted too much of my life >troubleshooting arcane Mac problems to be fooled by the rhetoric. And >what rhetoric! I know a half a dozen people with Apple logos TATOOED on >their bodies! I don't know any pc users dumb enough to have Microsoft's >logo indelibly etched into their flesh, do you? > >So yeah, I don't like macs. I've got a computer science degree, I use >and support macs every single day, I know how they work, I understand >why people like them, but it's all smoke and mirrors as far as I'm >concerned. I'll be happy to support them, for a premium. But I will >never, ever buy Apple products for my own use. > >My .02 > >-Ian > > >PS - DRM, no matter how transparent, no matter how well meaning, no >matter how or why it's implemented, is a tool of the Devil. IMHO. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: John/Slackonomics [mailto:slack@slackonomics.com] >Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 3:36 AM >To: idm@hyperreal.org >Subject: Re: [idm] what's wrong with Apple > > >On Nov 1, 2004, at 6:19 PM, Nicholas Bolibruch wrote: > > > >>I dislike Apple for compatibility reasons. >> >> > >Name me some of your "compatibility reasons", please. I use both >Windows and Macintosh and frankly I haven't really come across any of >your "compatibility reasons" yet. In fact, I find that Windows (or >rather, Microsoft software) is generally less compatible than Macintosh >and *Nix is. More Microsoft formats are closed-source, proprietary >than Apple. Especially now that Apple's operating system is based on >Unix and runs atop an open source platform. > > > >>I dislike the theme of Apple being the god-send of a corporation with >>a mission to crush evil Microsoft. But if they were in a similiar >>situation as Microsoft, they would be acting in a similiar manner - >>just like every company does. (if not even worse - since Steve Jobs is >>somewhat fucked up, if the movie Pirates of Silicon Valley portrays >> >> >him > > >>accurately at all) >> >> > >The only theme of "Apple being the god-send of a corporation with a >mission to crush evil Microsoft" is in your head. Nowhere has Apple >stated that that's their "theme". You have a problem with a certain >minority of vocal Apple users, not Apple itself, it sounds. > > > >>I dislike Apple because I associate their products to premium products >> >> > > > >>that do not provide any additional functionality than commodity >>products. (this can be very subjective obviously - but really I have >>no personal use for the apparent advantages OS X provides, or any >>other Apple product) This is especially true for the fact that I >>cannot afford to pay a premium on any of their products - I would much >> >> > > > >>rather go with a cheaper unpopular competitive product. Technology >>and consumer devices are expensive and if I can "trim the fat" I will >>certainly do so. >> >> > >The Apple eMac is $799, including monitor (well, it's all built-in to >the monitor). The Apple iBook starts at only $999. What was this >premium you were referring to again? :) > > > >>I dislike Apple for the fanboy/girls need to act as if Apple is the >>only >>innovative company in the world and that everyone is simply copying >>them. >> >> > >There's fanboys for every OS. You can't blame the company and or >larger platform just because a few users are idiots. I don't think >that's very fair, do you? > > > >>I dislike Apple for their support of DRM. >> >> > >Every online music store to my knowledge uses DRM. Except maybe some >marginal ones. DRM is unfortunately a necessary evil. Because, as we >see with stuff like Kazaa and Soulseek, a lot of people will ruin a >good thing. Apple wasn't the one that wanted to use DRM, it was the >labels. Do you REALLY think the labels would let the music be released >without DRM? > >Secondly, the DRM is mostly transparent. You can burn unlimited CD-Rs >of the music you buy on iTunes Music Store. You can copy the tracks to >an unlimited amount of iPods. You can also copy the music to up to >FIVE computers you own (or your work computers), including both Mac or >PC. You can stream the music to your friends/family on your network. >I don't find the store that restrictive at all (although to be honest, >I don't use it much since I still prefer to buy music on CD). > >If you don't like DRM, then don't use the music store. Simple as that. > It's just one small aspect of Apple as a business. > > > >>I dislike Steve Jobs for his "reality-distortion field". >> >> > >He's a salesman. I think his "reality-distortion field" is kinda funny >myself. If nothing else, you gotta admit that Steve Jobs has changed >the computer industry... numerous times. > > > >>I dislike Apple for their fanboy/girls and their need to defend Apple >>on >>every negative comment about Apple or Steve Jobs. >> >> > >Just like you're making disparaging comments about Apple just now? And >for the record, I'm a Windows user, too... so don't try lumping me in >to your little categories. > > > >>NOTE: >>I dislike Microsoft even more and for completely different reasons >>than Apple, and I would probably encourage people who have the money >>to purchase an Apple computer if they weren't using it to just play >>games. I even like OS X! The above reasons are similiar reasons to why >> >> > > > >>I also hate the whole nVidia vs. ATi fanboyism. I personally use >>Linux on commodity PC hardware - but I'm not going to preach to you >>about it - especially since I know there's hundreds of other Linux >>geeks who have lost touch with reality long ago that feel the need to >>preach anyway. So if someone hates company XYZ without stating any >>reason and are not on the subject of attacking company XYZ, please >>just accept it and move on with your lives. >> >> > >Well said. I enjoyed your post, btw. I mean no disrespect or >animosity in my reply. I just though I'd clarify a different point of >view. I respect your opinion on the matter and you're certainly >entitled to everything you said. > >-- > >Mr. Tangent [the binary police] >www.mrtangent.com > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > > > > >
-- B O B H U M I D @ G R O O V E M A G A Z I N E ( t e c h n o l o g i c a l _ e d i t o r ) servicelinks: http://www.groove.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org