179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
chthonic streams
To:
Date:
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 08:21:49 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] what's wrong with speed
Msg-Id:
<p05210602bdad3911b7a7@[64.63.223.198]>
In-Reply-To:
<1099381000.6329.54.camel@localhost>
Mbox:
idm.0411.gz
quoted 8 lines The Apple eMac is $799, including monitor (well, it's all built-in to> > The Apple eMac is $799, including monitor (well, it's all built-in to >> the monitor). The Apple iBook starts at only $999. What was this >> premium you were referring to again? :) >> > >That's still expensive considering the performance you would get from >similiarly priced PC commodity hardware. I consider notebook computers >still a premium product in general due to the level of integration.
what do you mean by "performance"? i ask because i had heard that the whole question of speed, touted in specs as "1.5Ghz" and so forth, is different on each platform. i.e. a 1.5Ghz processor on an IBM-compatible is not actually as fast or efficient as the same "speed" on a mac. thus PCs (if we must call them that, because apples are PCs too you know - wink wink) are always playing the one-upmanship game with apple - "our computer is faster, look at the specs!" but as any gearheads here who make music should know, specs often blur the truth. anyone know about this? d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org