At 11:42 25/08/97 -0700, you wrote:
quoted 4 lines argos writes:
>argos writes:
>> in other words (just to state the obvious to humourless americans) the
>> concepts of 16ths, 32nds, and 'funk' only apply in the cheesy world of midi
>> files, elevator muzak and musical car-horns.
quoted 2 lines you are a fool. 16th notes have been around since people started
>you are a fool. 16th notes have been around since people started
>notating music on paper.
is THAT so, i must have been REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY fucking
stupid not to have heard of them then, mustn't i? i think you missed my
point, that anybody who makes music with these rigid quantized rules, never
broken, or cannot appreciate the funk in a lot of music not normally called
'funky' (LFO 'probe' comes to mind), is pretty much a deadhead who won't go
anywhere.
quoted 3 lines there's two things you can achieve with "sloppy" programming:
>there's two things you can achieve with "sloppy" programming:
>1) you can sound engagingly warm and human
>2) you can sound like you don't know how to run your gear
quoted 1 line guess which one i think rdj is?
>guess which one i think rdj is?
i won't even bother, because you're just here to take the piss, and act
smart cos you've got this big cool studio (that i can replicate on my 400
quid computer)
there is more warmth and humanity in any AFX track than all the turd-hop
clone zombies in the whole wide world
quoted 3 lines even perfectly quantized midi music is subject to lots of
>even perfectly quantized midi music is subject to lots of
>imperfection. midi isn't a magic cureall. unfortunately it dates
>from the days when computers were a
i'll stop you there, if you don't mind.
cheerio!
np - step it up in dub - scientist
\/\/\/\/\/+++++''''||||
AVANT-GARDE NOISE TREMBLING NOISE UNIT ---/\_
phabulous phreeky fone filosophy, on the way soon from salford sounds
mr svinsdig, mr jones and silicon vortex to follow
CIGAR SMOKERS UNITE £575
----- --------