179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Robert Feuchtl
To:
Date:
Thu, 11 Nov 2004 00:55:36 +0100 (CET)
Subject:
RE: [idm] digital vs analogue in IDM context
Msg-Id:
<64831.62.143.78.113.1100130936.squirrel@62.143.78.113>
In-Reply-To:
<200411101555.AA1311703168@chthonicstreams.com>
Mbox:
idm.0411.gz
:D ahhh... yes. sir. clickedy cuts does smell funny man... the people have all the audio weaponry at their disposal that they could probably dream of. but they stick to one thing as soon as it sounds exactly like a copy of that sound of this label that they admire that did it 5 years ago. I call it the "Epigonian Syndrome".. its healthy to be influended by other ppls music, that is the way our perception and creativity works. but sometimes we musicians tend to masturbate, don´t we? where did all the fat snares go? to fat snare heaven??? i want some meat in the breaks dish... some meaty snares... less compression on the masters... better depth perception.. more dedication on the edit.. more fucking everything tracks cannot be tight in a day unless they have been jammed and you have been kissed by god on satan on this special day. MUSICIANS!!!!! WORK LONGER ON YOUR TRACKS!!!!!!!!!!!! I nnovative and D edicative M usic OR WHATs Y O U R BOMB?? B O B H U M I D @ F A T O F E X C E L L E N C E tech_editor / premastering servitor / transient protector service links: IDM? http://www.coad.to HOUSE?? http://www.twilatoo.com/featherweight/ GEARSLUT??? http://www.groove.de ****** * **** * ************** * ******** * save our transients. -12dB RMS. nuff said. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org