quoted 12 lines In a message dated 10/30/02 3:19:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>In a message dated 10/30/02 3:19:38 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>eggy@eggytoast.com writes:
>
>
>> It's happened before. IDM used to be the name for quiet, glitchy
>> music, but now that's called "microsound." So now the microsound
>> stuff has its own name, whereas the stuff that's outside of it is
>> still referred to as "IDM."
>
>Actually IDM means, obviously, "Intelligent Dance Music", which was a term
>coined by a journalist in the early 90's trying to explain the sound of the
>Orb.
As I said in the mail in response to mr. atomly, I meant this the
other way around -- that microsound didn't used to be called
microsound; it was lumped into "idm." Eventually it spurred its own
genre when it had a large enough following. which leads us to...
quoted 12 lines But anyhow.. I feel that there are 2 kinds of music: "Music" and "Genre
>But anyhow.. I feel that there are 2 kinds of music: "Music" and "Genre
>Music". Music is by musicians that are influenced by musics and get pegged
>into categories, but they just make music for musics sake. These producers
>expand, change, and grow with their tastes and the times. Then there is genre
>music. Genre music producers pick a genre of music they like, and only make
>that kind of music. The majority of club music is made in this fashion. Same
>with certain types of punk, metal, goth, hiphop, etc. This is for people who
>say "I am Goth, I like this band becaue this is a Goth band." Thats what I
>think will happen to IDM. In fact it is already happening. People become
>"IDM" producers, and try to mimic autechre or squarepusher. They play "IDM"
>shows, and they have an IDM style. I dont think it can be stopped, and
>personally, i dont mind. I just see it happening, and wanted to share that.
Sure, I can see that distinction. I don't necessarily agree, though
:D Most artists are influenced from somewhere: rock musicians hear
other rockers, cello players hear other cellists, and so on. Aphex
Twin hears some crazy techno and says 'cool.' The end results may be
different in all cases, but they all started with some ideas that got
in their heads *somehow*. The controversy over something as simple
as "The Hokey Pokey" proves that there are very, very rarely any
truly original ideas. I'd argue that some people like Aphex Twin and
the like possibly tried to be what you call "genre music," but failed
and came up with something else -- something else that they liked
more anyway!
As I've said in other posts to the list, one of the things I like
about the IDM genre is that it is pretty varied and that most of the
people are here because they like some aspect of IDM. In my mind,
keeping it so broad sort of deters those "genre people," as, you
know, what exactly is "IDM" anyway? It's easy to be goth, or punk,
or to make a certain style of music, but how do you "make idm?" And
if you want to sound like Aphex Twin, does that mean his SAW2 album,
his "ICBYD" album, his hyper-drum'nbass albums, or his AFX techno-ey
acid albums? And after you get past Aphex Twin, who else do you want
to sound like? If you want to sound like Plaid you certainly don't
sound like Oval, yet they're both IDM, and if you want to sound like
Autechre you probably won't and will get yelled at, yet will still be
IDM :)
Many have said that IDM isn't all Autechre and Squarepusher, and in
fact they make up a very, very small portion of the sound that's
present in this large, nebulous genre. If you go to an IDM show,
what can you expect? Crunchy beats with harsh melodies? Perhaps
soft beats with gentle melodies like Bola? Booty shaking Richard
Devine or Booty shaking Amon Tobin?
One of the weird things about the IDM list is that it is so
inconsistent in what it likes :) Each person on this list has
different tastes and it makes for some pretty good (or bad)
arguments. When a style of music gets large enough, many of those
people form a new list and flock to that, but the people left on the
IDM list generally aren't too fond of that style. So in those cases,
IDM becomes everything *but* the new genre. I know that's not
entirely true to the point of exclusivity, but if a new genre that
defines "crunchy beets and harsh melodies" is named and followed,
arguably there'll be less discussion of it on the idm-list and more
discussion on the c-beets-list. Same with mr. snares -- there'll
probably be a "noisy harsh drum 'n bass stuff like mr. snares makes"
list formed sometime soon, and people interested will join *that*
list and discuss it on *that* list, leaving us here on the IDM list
to talk about other things. Again, not to the point of exclusivity,
but enough that it's noticeable. And people will gladly point out
that a new release has aspects of that new genre with parts of old
genres and have some element of that good-ol' nebulous IDM.
derek
--
eggytoast.com
--------------
you'll shoot your eye out
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org