179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
subject “(idm) re the good old days” → 41 results
DateFromSubject
2000-03-1515:28Re: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
dude, relax...its not that big of a deal....you aint gotta…
2000-03-1510:17rob salls RE: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
Please won't you people shut up????? Were most of you even…
2000-03-1601:08bryan bickel Re: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Gonzi 'Fresh' Merchan wrote: you son of…
2000-03-1310:09rob salls RE: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
the black dog ep on bdr(92)or 91? , I don't…
2000-03-1613:52rob salls Re: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
>well, are to l33+ or what? idm can't possibly be good…
2000-03-1517:13marsel re: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
At 15-3-00 +0000 10:17, you wrote: > Please won't…
2000-03-1413:49Adam J Weitzman Re: (idm) The Good Old Days
If I had to delineate when the "good old days" of IDM…
2000-03-1417:35Irene McC Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
On 14 Mar 00, Simon Walley wrote re Re: (idm) The Good…
2000-03-1601:45Re: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
strange or funny-haha? :__}||||| ----- Original Message ----- From: bryan bickel
2000-03-1217:52Re: (idm) Re: The Good Old Days
In a message dated 3/12/00 12:34:19 PM Eastern…
2000-03-1514:53Simon Walley RE: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
"rob salls" >Please won't you people shut up????? Were most of…
2000-03-1600:10Colin King-Bailey Re: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
> "rob salls" > >Please won't you people shut up????? Were most of…
2000-03-1613:58rob salls Re: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
>From: rdevine@mindspring.com >Reply-To: idm@hyperreal.org >To:
2000-03-1320:58Michael Upton RE: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
>===== Original Message From AeOtaku@aol.com ===== >It shouldn't have anything to…
2000-03-1602:00joseph fitzpatrick Re: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
are you richard devine? -----Original Message----- From: rdevine@mindspring.com
2000-03-1600:59Gonzi 'Fresh' Merchan Re: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
>Standard IDM thread lamentation: 'let this thread die now before we get…
2000-03-1609:38Simon Walley Re: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
>From: "Colin King-Bailey" >Subject: Re: (idm) Re The…
2000-03-1509:42Simon Walley RE: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
>From: Kelley Hackett >Subject: RE: (idm) Re The…
2000-03-1313:44drift wood Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
--- Simon Walley wrote: > The only reason to re-issue…
2000-03-1601:47Brock Suter Re: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
Circumflex wrote: > ...gonzi's namedropping tendencies debate Hehehehe. Remember back in the…
2000-03-1623:33Colin King-Bailey Re: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
oh yeah, and what made the music in the 'golden age' better…
2000-03-1510:37Kelley Hackett RE: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
I understand CiM. Peace! Hk! -----Original Message----- From: Simon Walley [mailto:cim…
2000-03-1623:30Colin King-Bailey Re: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
i don't think anyone on this thread is really listening to…
2000-03-1223:55Noah Sasso (idm) Re: The Good Old Days
>The way I see it, part of the problem is 'genrefication' - give…
2000-03-1313:47Paul Robinson Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
Isn't Aphex supposed to have a huge backlog of unreleased material…
2000-03-1317:30Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
In a message dated 3/13/00 5:21:42 AM Eastern…
2000-03-1318:44Noah Sasso (idm) Re The Good Old Days
>There have been some interesting points in this thread, but it seems…
2000-03-1711:41Kelley Hackett RE: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
Ladies and Gentlemen, is this guy kiddn or what? Detroit Escalator Co…
2000-03-1217:36Massimo (idm) Re: The Good Old Days
Caution, incoming rant.... The way I see it, part of the problem…
2000-03-1317:41Adam Huffman Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, AeOtaku@aol.com wrote: > * Despite what you…
2000-03-1600:28Circumflex Re: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
on 3/15/00 7:10 PM, Colin King-Bailey wrote: >> "rob…
2000-03-1310:20Simon Walley Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
>-----Original Message----- >From: AeOtaku@aol.com [mailto:AeOtaku@aol.com] >Subject: (idm…
2000-03-1319:59Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
> On one of the other occasions when this topic has appeared, the…
2000-03-1318:32marsel Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
At 13-3-00 -0500 12:30, you wrote: >In a message…
2000-03-1223:08Brian Gause Re: (idm) Re: The Good Old Days
All, This is an interesting argument that crops up again and again…
2000-03-1317:21Kelley Hackett RE: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
At least we get some response.....sorry for spelling your name incorrectly…
2000-03-1416:36Kelley Hackett RE: (idm) Re The Good Old Days
Thats a good point Noah, and I was thinking that yesturday as…
2000-03-1411:09Simon Walley Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
>From: AeOtaku@aol.com >Subject: Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified…
2000-03-1213:10Kelley Hackett RE: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
ha ha....Matt, I like You for some reason......Well said fella…
2000-03-1122:38marsel Re: (idm) The Good Old Days (Quantified)
At 11-3-00 -0500 01:12, you wrote: >I would say…
2000-03-1122:55Christophe McKeon Re: (idm) The Good Old Days
Methinks the good old days of IDM are very old indeed. Perhaps…