179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Adam Piontek
To:
Date:
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:33:38 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
RE: [idm] VBR vs fixed rate ripping
Msg-Id:
<20020201003338.94786.qmail@web13804.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To:
<PPEOJEIEFLAONFNHJPOOCEDNDFAA.jim@jimtreats.com>
Mbox:
idm.0201.gz
--- James R Bamford <jim@jimtreats.com> wrote:
quoted 5 lines digital music beyond stuff you buy is only really> digital music beyond stuff you buy is only really > for putting on a harddisk > in my opinion.. I have a 8ft shelf above my bed with > all my CDs on it, or I > have a remote control and a jukebox server I've
well, I listen to my digital music off my hard drive, but I don't want to recopy everything so I'm sure as heck gonna have the digital stuff backed up - which has to be stored, which for a 24 year old in an apartment is an issue!
quoted 1 line night sleepy listenings)> night sleepy listenings)
my gf wouldn't like that :P i always listen to my stuff while i'm out and about; not at home much. different lifestyles lead to different priorities - i think that can pretty much sum up our differences of opinions :)
quoted 10 lines capability. It only uses> capability. It only uses > > ID3v1, IIRC. I need more than this! > > Why do you need more.. sure about 1% of my tracks > (5000) have their details > shortened cause it can't fit.. I agree this is a > pain... but apart from > getting that lengthed thats all I'd want.. I don't > want lyrics, images, > videos, or biographies bloating up my files.. I'll
I don't need any of that period. Just the music, and identifying information. But a big part of that for me, especially for this-listy music is the label and catalog number. having that in addition to the usual stuff makes my mp3 collection itself the database of my music collection...
quoted 4 lines Sure ogg is an upcoming star and is fully open> Sure ogg is an upcoming star and is fully open > source but its soooooooooooo > slow at the moment and still doesn't sound up to MPC > which isn't finalised either..
which kinda gets at the nub for me which is that MP3 *is* basically finalized and has a track record and supporting software and tons of people using it ... no incentive to switch to anything yet, given my lifestyle and a host of other things. So basically, I agree with you - MPC is the winner, the crown, as far as the audio itself goes, for lossy compression. It's kinda like gif vs jpg vs tiff vs bmp vs ... so many choices, all good for certain situations, and all intercompatible as long as you have good software. In fact, "everyone else uses MP3" isn't even an argument when you look at it this way. Who cares if your friend starts using MPC? When they're all built into WinAmp (inevitible) or some other common player, it doesn't matter if you have a mixed format music collection... So maybe I should just give in and start using MPC :P .adam __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org