Hi,
quoted 8 lines Just to reiterate a point I made earlier, the tracks on the new album are>Just to reiterate a point I made earlier, the tracks on the new album are
>hardly songs, but just simply explorations of rhythm, all mixed together
>in a smoldering melting pot of doggish delight. Listening to the tracks
>individually is a senseless act, and goes unrewarded. While at times the
>concept works quite well for the album, I found many of the 26 tracks to
>barely scratch the surface of Ken's unique talent. On the most part I
>was disappointed, but "Music for Adverts..." is hardly a BAD album. I
>just find it difficult to understand.
This is not meant as a flame but I was about to say "you just don't get it,
do you?" and by your own admission you don't. :)
Anyhow it definitely works better when listened to as one cohesive work than
as individual songs but there are tracks or clusters of tracks which do
stand out on their own, IMHO.
Btw, I suggest you use "IMHO" liberally in your posts like the above as
you'll give people who haven't heard it the wrong idea about this album. I
for one find it a very rewarding and interesting album... in fact one of the
highlights of the year so far.
Props to Derek for backing up my "Tzaddi" claim.
Regards,
John