179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

[idm] Confield (not a review)

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: confield (not a review) · now that's what i call lateral
2001-05-08 23:36Rob Salit [idm] Confield (not a review)
└─ 2001-05-09 10:48Irene McC [idm] now that's what I call lateral
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2001-05-08 23:36Rob SalitI'm not even going to attempt to give my review of Confield being that I've only listened
From:
Rob Salit
To:
IDM List
Date:
Tue, 08 May 2001 19:36:04 -0400
Subject:
[idm] Confield (not a review)
permalink · <B71DFB23.88E%rsalit@nyc.rr.com>
I'm not even going to attempt to give my review of Confield being that I've only listened to it once. One thing that was going though my head as I was listening to it was that it hardly seemed to fit to any of the reviews that I had read prior to listening. This made me think that maybe they pulled off something big by having a few different albums of music all circulating with the name "Confield" and all of the same track titles. But then I checked the audio samples on Warp and found that not to be the case. That could've been an interesting thing to do. Still can't figure out how the reviews are so drastically different. I'm not even talking about likes or dislikes...i'm talking about the descriptions of the tracks themselves. I just can't understand how someone could think that this album goes back to their pre-LP5 sound. My only comment at the moment is that its pretty much incomparable to anything I've heard before. TekDz9er --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-05-09 10:48Irene McCOn 8 May 2001, at 19:36, Rob Salit wrote: > This made me think that maybe > they pulled of
From:
Irene McC
To:
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 09 May 2001 12:48:41 +0200
Subject:
[idm] now that's what I call lateral
Reply to:
[idm] Confield (not a review)
permalink · <3AF93CA9.15043.D9261E@localhost>
On 8 May 2001, at 19:36, Rob Salit wrote:
quoted 3 lines This made me think that maybe> This made me think that maybe > they pulled off something big by having a few different albums of music > all circulating with the name "Confield" and all of the same track titles.
Brilliant idea... AND same track lengths to confuzz all the fuzzy logic db's. Tee hee. I * --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org