179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
EggyToast
To:
Date:
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 15:52:12 -0500
Subject:
re: [idm] new autechre - amberlovers don't actually like the real ae it seems
Msg-Id:
<5.1.0.14.2.20020723154538.01611608@mail.eggytoast.com>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0207231216120.535-100000@porky.nmt.edu>
Mbox:
idm.0207.gz
At 12:18 PM 7/23/2002 -0600, you wrote:
quoted 5 lines Has anyone else picked up on how people how say Amber is their best>Has anyone else picked up on how people how say Amber is their best >usually fail to appreciate ae? I think these people are rather stubborn >or uncurious or lacking in patience to listen to the later ae, which imo >are always evolutions, and offer many more interesting things than in >Amber. basically I think amber lovers are narrowminded.
They're very different albums sonically and aesthetically, so it's not really surprising. Amber is very similar to older-school IDM, like much of the stuff on Warp at the time. B12, Nightmares on Wax, etc. I do think it is a little myopic why anyone would think that the next autechre releases would sound like anything they've done in the past -- the only reason to pick them up, as a fan, is to see where they're going in the future. And that's sort of a different approach to enjoying an artist. Lots of times people follow an artist because the output has a consistent sound, rather than a consistent techique or signature 'weirdness.' Plenty of people buy an artist's or band's new album because they want more of the same; they really like the sound they heard before. Sometimes it just isn't the case, and Autechre are a case in point -- their stuff has "evolved" on each album, taking bits from the previous and expanding on those, rather than taking new bits and combining them with old consistently. I'm not drawing a comparison to Autechre and The Beatles, but they have the same camps -- people who like early Beatles don't tend to like older Beatles, and vice versa. They're different styles and types of music. Of course the albums in the middle tend to bridge the gap, but there aren't a lot of fans who like everything. I don't think it's very productive for either side, however, to claim that an album is "crappy" or "miserable" without providing a reason (for others to make an educated decision on their own). That's just trolling. derek ------- eggytoast.com ------- with lather thingy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org