Has anyone else picked up on how people how say Amber is their best
usually fail to appreciate ae? I think these people are rather stubborn
or uncurious or lacking in patience to listen to the later ae, which imo
are always evolutions, and offer many more interesting things than in
Amber. basically I think amber lovers are narrowminded.
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Peter Heide wrote:
quoted 27 lines when i get the dvd one way or another...the first i will do is to skip the 3 audio> when i get the dvd one way or another...the first i will do is to skip the 3 audio
> tracks and go straight to the vids.
>
> only the third track got maybe 3 min.of interest the rest is really just noise with a rythm
> ..just another tired release from ae.
>
> amber is still the best they ever done
>
>
>
> > Quoting "Albers, Brian" <BAlbers@PremiereRadio.com>:
> >
> > > So there's been a lot of talk about the new dvd. But nobody has really
> > > commented on the music.
> > >
> > > How are the new tracks? Are they comparable to any of their past work? I
> > > hope they're not like anything from that miserable Confield album.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>
Hooray for Pokey!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org