179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Michael Upton
To:
, idm
Date:
Fri, 16 Jun 2000 02:02:30 -0400
Subject:
RE: [idm] constructive criticism -
Msg-Id:
<3951B323@MailAndNews.com>
Mbox:
idm.0006.gz
quoted 1 line ===== Original Message From edhall@weirdnoise.com =====>===== Original Message From edhall@weirdnoise.com =====
quoted 2 lines Saying you can't stand something is an opinion. Saying it>Saying you can't stand something is an opinion. Saying it >is garbage is an attempt to state an opinion as a fact.
FWIW, I would consider the second sentence above to be an attempt to state an opinion as a fact. At the least you are doing exactly the same thing, grammatically (using a passive mood over personal pronouns), so if grammatical constructions are all that matter, you're just as guilty. I tend to think that the key thing this kind of stuff misses by a country mile is that people use language differently on mailing lists. Consider your context. Some people carefully pick every word, others are more colloquial and chatty. Saying "when you write this, this is the result" strikes me as nonsense, if the massive amount of stylistic variation from poster to poster is not considered. All of that aside, there is a little philosophical buzzword called "emotivism", which states that "X is good" and "I like X", when said by the same speaker, are semantically equivelant. I don't want to muddy my above comment by suggesting this is particularly relevant though, as my main point is that it's impossible to know where any individual poster is coming from to the degree you're ascribing above. Michael np. 'State of the Art Heirloom' -+- Involve Records http://involve.co.nz Jet Jaguar MP3s http://mp3.com/jetjag/ -+- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org