179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
random junk
To:
IDM
Date:
Fri, 21 Mar 1997 12:08:14 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) RE:AFX Big Day Out Set
Msg-Id:
<XFMail.970321121057.jsd@gamespot.com>
In-Reply-To:
<yam7019.564.128173968@clark.net>
Mbox:
idm.9703.gz
quoted 7 lines Ironically, thanks to the Audio Home Recording Act, owners of DATs and>>Ironically, thanks to the Audio Home Recording Act, owners of DATs and >>other digital recording devices who make digital copies of copyrighted >>material for private use are exempted from copyright infringement >>liability (in return for this, record labels get royalties for every DAT >>or other digital recording device) sold. >>Do plain old analog recording devices (with arguably shittier fidelity) >>get this protection? Nope. wierd innit?
false. united states code, title 17, chapter 10, subchapter d, section 1008: § 1008. Prohibition on certain infringement actions No action may be brought under this title alleging infringement of copyright based on the manufacture, importation, or distribution of a digital audio recording device, a digital audio recording medium, an analog recording device, or an analog recording medium, or based on the noncommercial use by a consumer of such a device or medium for making digital musical recordings or analog musical recordings.
quoted 2 lines hm.. I just thought it was one of those things that no one enforces cos who>hm.. I just thought it was one of those things that no one enforces cos who >cares if you copy the latest CD for a friend?
it's not enforceable because it's totally legal! as long as you don't sell it. Jon Drukman jsd@gamespot.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- System Administrator SpotMedia Communications