179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
The Rare Guy
To:
IDM
Date:
Fri, 21 Mar 1997 01:31:11 EST4EDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) RE:AFX Big Day Out Set
Msg-Id:
<yam7019.564.128173968@clark.net>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.OSF.3.95q.970320124234.3441H-100000@Bayou.UH.EDU>
Mbox:
idm.9703.gz
On 20-Mar-97, khannan suntharam scribbled something about Re: (idm) RE:AFX Big Day Out Set:
quoted 1 line On Thu, 20 Mar 1997, The Rare Guy wrote:>On Thu, 20 Mar 1997, The Rare Guy wrote:
quoted 1 line i think tapes are shit anyway, basically.. we came from vinyls, to tape, to>> i think tapes are shit anyway, basically.. we came from vinyls, to tape, to
quoted 7 lines Ironically, thanks to the Audio Home Recording Act, owners of DATs and>Ironically, thanks to the Audio Home Recording Act, owners of DATs and >other digital recording devices who make digital copies of copyrighted >material for private use are exempted from copyright infringement >liability (in return for this, record labels get royalties for every DAT >or other digital recording device) sold. >Do plain old analog recording devices (with arguably shittier fidelity) >get this protection? Nope. wierd innit?
hm.. I just thought it was one of those things that no one enforces cos who cares if you copy the latest CD for a friend? anyway.. just to make things absolutely clear, I said normal casette tapes are shit, not DAT or HiFi VHS tapes, like some people I know use for music purposes. -- __ __\ \ Aurafix aka Hillie / PHD ^ DAMONES / /_\ \ http://www.clark.net/pub/buh/index.html \_____/ >> buh@clark.net >> < > .. >> .<>> >> > , m7= Do re mi fa so la ti .. Oh let's see if we can make it easier..