| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 1996-03-2123:49 | synades <synades@mainz.netsurf.de> | (idm) 33,45,78 not idm, but i like vortex (plus8010) on 33 reverse .-)
synades
|
| 1994-03-1618:13 | Alan Michael Parry <brit@chopin.udel.edu> | Re: 33/45
33 it is.
_______
(__,-, \
/ /\ \ f l u i d
/,_) \ \
(/ \\ brit@chopin.udel.edu… |
| 1997-04-2215:14 | matt <c649946@showme.missouri.edu> | Re: (idm) 33 -> 45 > try 36.7%.......
> Brendan
actually 35%, exactly.
45
the ratio is ------- = 1… |
| 1994-03-1617:52 | Teep <ARAN%MITVMC.BITNET@Forsythe.Stanford.EDU> | 33/45 i had a prerelease of SAW2 and also now own the vynal… |
| 1993-12-0314:57 | Tp <ARAN%MITVMC.BITNET@Forsythe.Stanford.EDU> | 33+45 so am i to believe that some people have copies of ON… |
| 2001-04-0614:32 | Petter <petterottosson@yahoo.com> | [idm] Kit Clayton - Lateral Forces. 33/45? 33 or 45? 33 and 45?
Any ideas?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get… |
| 1997-04-2200:04 | john/bergmayer <yesno@primenet.com> | (idm) 33 -> 45
say i was to have a song on cd. let's say… |
| 1996-03-2119:46 | Dave Walker <marmoset@mich.com> | Re: (idm) 33,45,78 (no not the Stereo MCs) tkorpipa |
| 1994-03-1618:37 | Matthew Corwine <mcorwine@u.washington.edu> | Re: 33/45
On Wed, 16 Mar 1994, Teep wrote:
> i had a prerelease of… |
| 1996-03-2214:55 | Erkki Rautio <trerra@uta.fi> | Re: (idm) 33,45,78 (no not the Stereo MCs)
While we are on this subject... Has anyone else
ever given a… |
| 1997-04-2200:25 | MaSS Neo-TeK <bswift@MCS.VUW.AC.NZ> | Re: (idm) 33 -> 45 try 36.7%.......
Brendan
On Mon, 21 Apr 1997, john/bergmayer wrote… |
| 1996-03-2116:15 | Jeff Linacre <jlinacre@ludwig.ucl.ac.uk> | Re: (idm) 33,45,78 (no not the Stereo MCs) james wrote:
>One of the tracks on HAB2 (not the "everyday" one… |
| 1996-02-1912:26 | Jon ROSS <rossj@esiee.fr> | (idm) 33/45?? Sorry, but it's the old 33/45 RPM question yet again… |
| 1997-04-2111:31 | Nick Bishop <bishopn@owlnet.rice.edu> | Re: (idm) 33 -> 45 At 05:04 PM 4/21/97 -0700, john/bergmayer wrote:
>
>say… |
| 2001-04-0803:19 | sarah ellenberger <djdesada@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] Kit Clayton - Lateral Forces. 33/45?
it sounds okay at both... but i'd like to know which… |
| 1996-03-2813:26 | Erkki Rautio <trerra@uta.fi> | Re: (idm) 33,45,78 (no not the Stereo MCs)
I suppose this one was meant to the list...
-----
Forwarded message:
From… |
| 1996-03-2118:53 | tkorpipa <tkorpipa@siba.fi> | Re: (idm) 33,45,78 (no not the Stereo MCs)
This is propably as far from idm as you can get but… |
| 1996-03-2115:34 | James Skilton <JAMESS@firefox.co.uk> | (idm) 33,45,78 (no not the Stereo MCs) Sugatis wrote on Thu, 21 Mar 96 01:06:50 GMT :
> Also… |
| 1996-03-2212:59 | tkorpipa <tkorpipa@siba.fi> | Re: (idm) 33,45,78 (no not the Stereo MCs) On 21 Mar 1996, Dave Walker wrote:
> tkorpipa |
| 2001-04-0909:34 | Petter <petterottosson@yahoo.com> | Re: [idm] Kit Clayton - Lateral Forces. 33/45? That would be my guess to, but only for the B side… |
| 2001-04-0910:44 | Petter <petterottosson@yahoo.com> | Re: [idm] Kit Clayton - Lateral Forces. 33/45? I had to know, so I mailed Vertical Form about this.
The… |
| 1996-03-2219:43 | multipara <Peter.Gebert@uni-konstanz.de> | records and self-reference (was Re: (idm) 33,45,78...) Teemu (tkorpipa@siba.fi) wrote:
>This is propably as far from idm… |