179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
laerm
To:
Date:
Tue, 29 Dec 1998 18:07:39 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) re: the poll
Msg-Id:
<Pine.GSO.3.96.981229180559.27848I-100000@unix01>
In-Reply-To:
<v03102803b2af08e2ed74@[194.16.250.247]>
Mbox:
idm.9812.gz
On Tue, 29 Dec 1998, henrik str0mberg wrote:
quoted 2 lines yes, out with the 'genre' categories, they're a bitch to define.> yes, out with the 'genre' categories, they're a bitch to define. > instead i'd like a 'non-IDM' category, please.
i do enjoy a great deal of "non"-idm music, but what's the sense of voting for them on an "idm" list? also, along the lines of defining genres, who's to say what isn't idm? * #### a disturbance in a system. #### laerm. @voicenet.com ##:# i don't speak in anger/though the chances that i've let pass me by and now regret/i can't forget/they're haunting me like a score of unpaid debts icq: 5562209