quoted 1 line Written by Humanerr0r@aol.com?
> Written by Humanerr0r@aol.com?quoted 2 lines social aggressiveness and destruction - it seems to be the opposite
>>social aggressiveness and destruction - it seems to be the opposite
>>to what the techno musicians are about.
heh, not all of us.
techno is a microcosm of most music, mate.
you've got yer boring pink floyds, and your upstart pistols.
As i see it, in 30 years time, people will be writing
about how great the underground music of the late 80's
and 90's was. and "who fucking cares", if they don't.
who (ask your mum and dads?) looked at the 60's in
awe when they were living through them. precious few,
eh?
anyway, imho the punk vibe's alive and kicking,
and the question should be not, "who was a punk"
but "who is punk". there's a big difference, and
it's probably not a train of thought welcome in
here.
Just my 2p..
Cheers
Ken
--
+ . /\___/\ . * | < The Black Dog > | + * . . * .
. * (. .) + | | . * . * +
___ooO__\-/__Ooo___ | | + + + + .
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ | Dogma >> |
http://www.feedback.com/tbd/
* 3-5-3 * (Dis)information > | tbd@feedback.com