179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: [idm] Boards Of Canada (with real content! -- at the bottom)

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 3 subjects: boards of canada · boards of canada (with real content! -- at the bottom) · boards of canada truth
2001-09-13 22:47[idm] Boards Of Canada TRUTH
2001-09-13 23:12Static Beats Re: [idm] Boards Of Canada
└─ 2001-09-14 00:52EggyToast Re: [idm] Boards Of Canada (with real content! -- at the bottom)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2001-09-13 22:47LOWONICE13@aol.comIn a message dated 9/13/01 5:34:03 PM Central Daylight Time, killog123@juno.com writes: <<
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, 13 Sep 2001 18:47:52 EDT
Subject:
[idm] Boards Of Canada TRUTH
permalink · <c.1b15d4c6.28d29198@aol.com>
In a message dated 9/13/01 5:34:03 PM Central Daylight Time, killog123@juno.com writes: << boards of canada as peodofiles >> ok, get ready... BOC are not pedophiles. If you think that having children in images is a sign of pedophilia you are quite simply messed up. Get yourself out of the internet porn gutter and then you may see things how they really are once your mind has cleared. Yes pedophiles are all over, but if you even listened to the genius of BOC and know what they are about you'll realize there is no sexual attraction to children driving their interest in youth, innocence, and nostalgia. There, now nobody ever ask again. Nick *waiting for the guys to release a new BOC album* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-09-13 23:12Static BeatsHELLO HELLO HELLO?! IT WAS A JOKE ! SHEESH PEOPLE. THAT EMAIL I SENT WAS A WEEK AGO ! Does
From:
Static Beats
To:
Date:
Thu, 13 Sep 2001 16:12:40 -0700
Subject:
Re: [idm] Boards Of Canada
permalink · <010901c13ca9$96bf17d0$eb464440@shimonent>
HELLO HELLO HELLO?! IT WAS A JOKE ! SHEESH PEOPLE. THAT EMAIL I SENT WAS A WEEK AGO ! Doesn't anyone remember the rediculous "BOC are paedophiles" flamewar we had here a few weeks ago? My refence was to THAT disussion. It was an inside joke. Most listmembers would get it I assume. Also, my sarcasm was in no way ugly. It was sarcasm and meant to prevent this poor naive soul from getting FLAMED as you people are so obviously quick to do. Notice that I didn't get any reply from the original poster telling me I was a "prick". If they had, I'd simply apologise and explain - no harm meant - it was merely a little list humor. In addition, certain lismembers replied to me personally, offlist and respectfully to state that maybe I could have been a bit more helpful instead of sarcastic - mind you that was a week ago when I originally sent the joke. CONSTRUCTIVE critisicm it is called - and I took it to heart and have been providing to posters such answers to questions like the URL for Warp Records and how to find it in the future. Do you think I'm a fucking MORON to assume because someone puts a picture of kids on their album it somehow defines their sexual tendencies? My god. Why are you people bringing this up right now? Is there some sort of point you're all trying to get at? Have you got something intelligent to add other than your misunderstanding of my post? Flaming is so completely pointless. It solves nothing, it accomplishes nothing and more often than not it waste the time of countless individuals who beforehand had more important things to discuss. Much worse than a bad joke is a stupid thread with no point that continues to unravel without any apparent purpose. I recommend you try and devote your time to more goal-oriented crusades. Shimone/Justes http://www.staticbeats.com | Electronic Music For The Mind http://www.shimone.org | Pictures From The Soul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-09-14 00:52EggyToast>Doesn't anyone remember the rediculous "BOC are paedophiles" flamewar we had >here a few
From:
EggyToast
To:
Static Beats
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:52:47 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] Boards Of Canada (with real content! -- at the bottom)
Reply to:
Re: [idm] Boards Of Canada
permalink · <5.1.0.14.2.20010913192125.024dda30@youn0394.email.umn.edu>
quoted 8 lines Doesn't anyone remember the rediculous "BOC are paedophiles" flamewar we ha>Doesn't anyone remember the rediculous "BOC are paedophiles" flamewar we had >here a few weeks ago? My refence was to THAT disussion. It was an inside >joke. Most listmembers would get it I assume. Also, my sarcasm was in no way >ugly. It was sarcasm and meant to prevent this poor naive soul from getting >FLAMED as you people are so obviously quick to do. Notice that I didn't get >any reply from the original poster telling me I was a "prick". If they had, >I'd simply apologise and explain - no harm meant - it was merely a little >list humor.
Yes -- humor used to be quite common, and I enjoyed it (still do, when it's around (hi wells!)) Now, every list newbie has a frog up their ass and feels they have to croak about, instead of just, uhh, not responding? If someone posts obviously false information, then correct them. If someone posts an opinion that differs from yours, deal with it. If it's NOT about idm, don't respond to the IDM list. The I in IDM stands figuratively for "intelligent." It meant that you had to have some sort of brain cells in order to find the stupid records, and a couple more to enjoy them. You need at least a few more to be able to discuss them. That means that the *majority* of people here know that opinions differ and are probably clued in to most sides of the story. If someone asks "Does anyone here like [popular IDM artist]?" there will be some people who like said artist, and others who don't like them. Both with valid reasons. I would assume that the majority of people on the list like IDM, unless they're like those weirdos that "hate the US but live in it." OK? We all like IDM. This is the IDM list. What should we do here? ------------ I have the Kettel CD, and, although it's nice, I think I enjoyed some of the mp3's more. Perhaps because they weren't associated with other songs, or because Mr. Kettel felt they were strong enough to stand on their own. If you've never heard of Kettel, I'd recommend the CD as some nice summery music with very nice melodies, but if you're strapped for cash and just want one or two of his really good songs, try to hunt down some of the non-CD mp3's. How is that Fennezszssz CD that was being talked about, summer something..? I have Oval's "Systemich," which is beautiful in parts (and currently missing!), and enjoy relatively sparse-yet-beautiful music in general... would I like much fennesz? thanks, derek ------- eggytoast.com ------- coming to a cineplex near you --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org