179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) future of IDM-L

7 messages · 7 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 3 subjects: (idm) future of idm-l · (idm) greed · (idm) warning: rant on "(idm) greed"
2000-03-17 11:30andy panda (idm) GREED
2000-03-17 18:43Brock Suter (idm) WARNING: RANT on "(idm) GREED"
2000-03-17 19:35Ross Balmer Re: (idm) future of IDM-L
2000-03-17 20:07William VanLoo Re: (idm) future of IDM-L
2000-03-17 22:41William Samuels Re: (idm) future of IDM-L
2000-03-18 00:08Rishi Saez Re: (idm) future of IDM-L
2000-03-18 01:36Brian Gause Re: (idm) future of IDM-L
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-03-17 11:30andy pandai don't know who all brock was referring to when he said "greedy little fucks". i have bee
From:
andy panda
To:
Date:
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 03:30:41 PST
Subject:
(idm) GREED
permalink · <20000317113041.45651.qmail@hotmail.com>
i don't know who all brock was referring to when he said "greedy little fucks". i have been bit greedy though. i'll admit, it was really starting to get to me that these people on ebay were making money off of an audience recording while i wasn't even utilizing the master recording as a trading piece. here i am, gifting it to friends, wanting to share it with the world, yet still holding off from spreading it too wide in fear that i could no longer use it to obtain other rarities. it's hard for me to think of how autechre might feel about this. funny thing about all these artists i love so much.....i'm almost incapable of feeling sorry for them when their music is so relentlessly bootlegged. sean & rob, mike & marcus....i love you guys, because you've enriched my life so. you've filled my life with exctacy where there might otherwise have been slow monotonous death. but for godsakes, spread it around a bit more........alot more. what the fuck? i couldn't start to comprehend creating such a spellbinding masterpiece, only to give it to a trillionth of the human population. sure, it's intended to mean a great deal to the recipient, it shows them they're special, but on the other end, it's a slap in the face & a dick up the bum to all the diehard fans, & a frustration to everyone else. it does more damage than it does good. what a teaser......what a lifeshattering teaser, to have knowledge of things such as hooper bay, & to know i couldn't experience it for the very deed to my soul. it makes being the type of fan i was for devo or the b-52s or primus or boogie down productions, impossible for groups who'd rather the rest of 'us' weren't included in the fun because were not 'them & theirs'. i had never experienced feelings like that before i happened upon & immersed myself in the realm of 'incredibly difficult & sometimes impossible to obtain creme of the crop robotronical sciencerock'. from the time i heard about it, it took 4 years for Aes' remix for dominique dalcan to find it's way into my aural library. i'd have given a nut & a foot for that track, based solely on Aes' near inability to create an ungodly track. luckily, my homeboy chanced upon a guy who was willing to trade it for about 20 times as much shit. 4 discs packed with rare & exclusive shit from ae & boc for 1 track. it was worth it. that guy's stoked now & so are we. unfortunately, i see no other way to obtain a ton of the shit i'm looking for without some heavyweight shit in return. when everyone can get their ears on whatever's gonna make them happy, this necessity will vanish & i'll be able to relax. alas, there is no light at the end of the tunnel :( ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-17 18:43Brock SuterI thank andy panda for the subject line. That's what this all has to do with, along with r
From:
Brock Suter
To:
Cc:
Aran M. Parillo , Brian Rachielles , andy panda
Date:
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 10:43:47 -0800
Subject:
(idm) WARNING: RANT on "(idm) GREED"
permalink · <38D27CE3.29A7F38@alchemyfx.com>
I thank andy panda for the subject line. That's what this all has to do with, along with respect, or lack of. In looking through my IDM archives to find what kind of poster Andy was, I found something very disturbing. But first a disclaimer: I am not trying for force my morals on anyone. You can do what you want, but when people start posting, in public, about things that I'm not cool with (I.E.: illegal/immoral/things that do not belong on this list) that's when I feel I should say something. Read this entire post as IMHO. :begin rant: Due to people like andy (aka Joseph Andrew Gallo aka AJ), this list is rapidly becoming a haven for bootlegs/auctions/sales/trades. Some may think this is ok, but I do not. And I'll tell you why. Andy, along with others who have made similar posts, are greedy little thieves who think they are ENTITLE to everything and anything they want. In November and December of 1999, it appears that Andy CDR'd his ENTIRE collection of rare IDM records and auctioned them off for as much money as he could get. In the post he made this week about the ae bootleg, he revealed that not only does he still have ALL of the music that he auctioned off on EBAY, he is willing to use it to trade for even more bootleg copies of rare IDM music. Some people see nothing wrong with this practice. I do. I OWN all of those records and I love them. I would NEVER think of giving them up because they are a part of my collection. I've downloaded (or recorded myself) quite a few of them on mp3/CD for backup, and even further, originally purchased MANY of them in dual formats, both vinyl and CD, for the same reason. I understand this is a privilege of having a decent job and money to do so, but that's why I work. I HAVE given out copies of many of these items, mainly in the form of mixtapes, but have asked for NOTHING in return. I've tried to explain WHY I think it's wrong to sell an original of a rare object and keep a perfect copy before. Some people understood and some people didn't. Andy is one of those who obviously doesn't. Some think that there is no theft here, just 'idm patron saintly behavior' because they are allowing others a RARE chance at OWNING this music. This is bullshit. Just because you WANT something doesn't mean you are entitled to it. Look at the warez scene. If this was a Steinberg mailing list, would it be ok to sell your original copies of cubase, recycle, and rebirth here, while telling everyone that you ARE keeping (and will be selling/trading) CDR's of the originals and photocopies of the manuals? No it would not. Is it ok to make copies of money and sell the bills? No it is not. So what makes these records any different? Oh, they're RARE and OUT OF PRINT and everyone should be able to listen to them. While I'm not going to argue that people shouldn't be able to listen to the music, I am going to say that I don't think it's cool to publicly post blatantly illegal practices to this list. It's completely disrespectful to all the people have gone to the record store twice a week for years, who paid for and cherish this music, it's disrespectful to the labels who are represented here as well as the artists themselves. Some may argue that this isn't the case but it is, AFAIK. I makes the whole list look greedy, immature and stupid. It's no wonder that artists like FSOL, RDJ, AE, BDP, James Bernard, JSD, MMM, etc can't stand it here. And yeah kids, you'd be surprised who's been on IDM in the years I've been here. I still talk to quite a few of them and they think IDM is a big shithole now. 'Back in the old days' there were few FS/FA/FT lists posted. If you wanted to sell or trade something, you would post that you have a list of items for sale and anyone who's interested in knowing what they are would email you privately for that list. Or a simple url with the list would suffice. Today we have a bunch of little fuckers running around trying to make money and posting a million auction anouncments and updates. All I can chalk it up to is immaturity, greed and laziness. I motion that we ban (or limit) this practice from the list once again. This list is a place for discussion of the music we call IDM, not a place for finding the music. I used to email people asking for their FS lists. Now I want to email people telling them to fuck off and die every time a 150+ line auction list pops into my IDM box. Personally, I don't use IDM as a vehicle for making money OR a name for myself. It keeps things simpler that way. I love to dj and I do it for FREE. I love to play live, and I do it for FREE. I love to make people tapes, and I do it for FREE. I don't mind that people ARE making money off the music I love, artists or labels for example, but when I see people constantly updating the list on their auctions, where the starting bid for a copy of mask 200 is $150, it makes me want to puke. It's all about GREED and the quest for MORE stuff. Fuck all you little shitheads. You have no place here, as far as I am concerned. :end rant: Andy is confused. In one post (10.26.99) he said:
quoted 2 lines ok, if you have a problem w/whats below, please e-mail me> ok, if you have a problem w/whats below, please e-mail me > personally, not the list:
In another (3.16.00) he said:
quoted 3 lines TO ANYONE WHO HAS A PROBLEM WITH MY TRADE OFFER & WANTLIST & JUST NEEDS TO> TO ANYONE WHO HAS A PROBLEM WITH MY TRADE OFFER & WANTLIST & JUST NEEDS TO > BE VOCAL ABOUT IT, POST YOUR COMMENTS ON THE LIST OR WHINE TO YOUR FRIENDS. > JUST DON'T EMAIL ME CUZ I DON'T GIVE A FLYING FUCK.
then later (3.16.00):
quoted 1 line none of care brock. have a shitfit over something that matters eh> none of care brock. have a shitfit over something that matters eh
I said 'I do care' and I got told:
quoted 1 line bravo you fucking idiot. eat a dick.> bravo you fucking idiot. eat a dick.
I'd like to open the floor to the more intelligent members of IDM-L and ask what should be done about the rampant abuse and subsequent deterioration of this list. thank you for listening. brock --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-17 19:35Ross BalmerI like IDM precisely because it is so broad. I appreciate the fact that people will talk a
From:
Ross Balmer
To:
Date:
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 19:35:44 -0000
Subject:
Re: (idm) future of IDM-L
permalink · <15a101bf9047$ffdc2b00$7801010a@tuimedia.co.uk>
I like IDM precisely because it is so broad. I appreciate the fact that people will talk about stuff ranging from the obvious canditates to, say, My Bloody Valentine or Skinny Puppy. IDM-L is where I find most of the information I need to decide what music to get each month. Ross. ----- Original Message ----- From: William VanLoo <wdvanloo@sigma6.com> To: <idm@hyperreal.org> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 8:07 PM Subject: Re: (idm) future of IDM-L
quoted 5 lines I often download my mail in the morning, select all new IDM messages,> I often download my mail in the morning, select all new IDM messages, > excepting a few messages with interesting subject lines or from people > I know and respect, and delete the rest. Why? I think IDM-L is far too > broad. I don't enjoy much of the music that gets discussed here, > although I do stay on because of the rare gems.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-17 20:07William VanLoo> I'd like to open the floor to the more intelligent members of IDM-L and > ask what shoul
From:
William VanLoo
To:
Date:
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 14:07:52 -0600
Subject:
Re: (idm) future of IDM-L
permalink · <38D29098.EA568EB1@sigma6.com>
quoted 3 lines I'd like to open the floor to the more intelligent members of IDM-L and> I'd like to open the floor to the more intelligent members of IDM-L and > ask what should be done about the rampant abuse and subsequent > deterioration of this list.
Brock, I've been on the list for quite some time myself, and I've come to the realization that IDM-L is not really the place for me. Here's why. I often download my mail in the morning, select all new IDM messages, excepting a few messages with interesting subject lines or from people I know and respect, and delete the rest. Why? I think IDM-L is far too broad. I don't enjoy much of the music that gets discussed here, although I do stay on because of the rare gems. So what's the answer? For me, it's keeping a subscription to IDM & treating it as a totally secondary entity, instead of the one true community that I belong to for music discussion. In addition to IDM, I am on a number of genre-specific lists - Microsound, minimalism, 313, ambient. These lists have a much more narrow focus and much better signal-to-noise ratio. Unfortunately, this doesn't say much for the future of IDM, but maybe it offers some suggestions to those who have been long-time members and are frustrated in the way Brock is. checking in from time to time, Bill / dj marathon -- AppNet MidWest Interactive [formerly Sigma6] / http://www.appnet.com now available: http://techno.ca/cognition/show598.htm always on: http://www.chromedecay.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-17 22:41William Samuels--- Ross Balmer <ross@tui.co.uk> wrote: > I like IDM precisely because it is so broad. I >
From:
William Samuels
To:
Date:
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 14:41:38 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) future of IDM-L
permalink · <20000317224138.10185.qmail@web2103.mail.yahoo.com>
--- Ross Balmer <ross@tui.co.uk> wrote:
quoted 8 lines I like IDM precisely because it is so broad. I> I like IDM precisely because it is so broad. I > appreciate the fact that > people will talk about stuff ranging from the > obvious canditates to, say, My > Bloody Valentine or Skinny Puppy. IDM-L is where I > find most of the > information I need to decide what music to get each > month.
Agreed. It's alot more interesting to read about many styles of music. The fact that you can read about anything from dub to jungle to noise is really cool. I personally get very bored when the talk is focused on just a few artists, especially when they don't have anything new out. No matter how much I like an artists, once I know what I want..I have no desire to talk about it to the point of ad nauseam. This list however wouldn't be my first choice for finding new music. Alot of people speak highly of even the most amateurish releases. Hearing it in the record shop is always the best. ===== Listen to Swope Transmissions Friday 6-9pm (Pacific) http://kuci.org __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-18 00:08Rishi Saez>I often download my mail in the morning, select all new IDM messages, >excepting a few me
From:
Rishi Saez
To:
Date:
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 16:08:04 PST
Subject:
Re: (idm) future of IDM-L
permalink · <20000318000804.84778.qmail@hotmail.com>
quoted 3 lines I often download my mail in the morning, select all new IDM messages,>I often download my mail in the morning, select all new IDM messages, >excepting a few messages with interesting subject lines or from people >I know and respect, and delete the rest.
That's precisely what I do as well. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-03-18 01:36Brian GauseThis list is only going to be as good as we make it...and lately I've realized that I don'
From:
Brian Gause
To:
Date:
Fri, 17 Mar 2000 17:36:35 -0800
Subject:
Re: (idm) future of IDM-L
permalink · <38D2DDA3.715FD751@us.oracle.com>
This list is only going to be as good as we make it...and lately I've realized that I don't much like it...so I'm getting involved. Lurking is fine if you don't really care, but if you want the list to improve, do whatever it is that you think should be done. For me, this means ignoring the tripe and the bile, deleting all the insulting and useless stuff...and contributing my own thoughts on things. There seem to be two ways to increase the signal to noise ratio of this place...1) kick out the offenders (or, more to the point, address them at all) or 2) simply ignore the noise and broadcast your own signals. I'm choosing the second. I could go somewhere else for musical advice, reccommendations and general insight, but why should I? I still share a lot of the same tastes as much of the list and it's still useful for me. So I'm getting more involved...just my 4 cents...inflation, you see. ---brian William VanLoo wrote:
quoted 38 lines I'd like to open the floor to the more intelligent members of IDM-L and> > I'd like to open the floor to the more intelligent members of IDM-L and > > ask what should be done about the rampant abuse and subsequent > > deterioration of this list. > > Brock, > > I've been on the list for quite some time myself, and I've come to the > realization that IDM-L is not really the place for me. Here's why. > > I often download my mail in the morning, select all new IDM messages, > excepting a few messages with interesting subject lines or from people > I know and respect, and delete the rest. Why? I think IDM-L is far too > broad. I don't enjoy much of the music that gets discussed here, > although I do stay on because of the rare gems. > > So what's the answer? For me, it's keeping a subscription to IDM & > treating it as a totally secondary entity, instead of the one true > community that I belong to for music discussion. In addition to IDM, I > am on a number of genre-specific lists - Microsound, minimalism, 313, > ambient. These lists have a much more narrow focus and much better > signal-to-noise ratio. > > Unfortunately, this doesn't say much for the future of IDM, but maybe > it offers some suggestions to those who have been long-time members > and are frustrated in the way Brock is. > > checking in from time to time, > > Bill / dj marathon > -- > AppNet MidWest Interactive [formerly Sigma6] / http://www.appnet.com > > now available: http://techno.ca/cognition/show598.htm > always on: http://www.chromedecay.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
-- Save the whales. Collect the whole set. Trade them with your friends. Brian Gause Technical Writer Applications Division Oracle Corporation (650) 506-1311 bgause@us.oracle.com The statements and opinions expressed here are my own and do not necessarily represent those of Oracle Corporation. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org