179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Re: IDM relevancy and other insignificant things

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: (idm) jimi tenor's idm relevancy and other insignificant things · (idm) re: idm relevancy and other insignificant things
1997-04-05 12:07daniel smith (idm) Re: IDM relevancy and other insignificant things
└─ 1997-04-05 19:36The Rare Guy Re: (idm) Re: IDM relevancy and other insignificant things
1997-04-05 15:43Erkki Rautio (idm) Jimi Tenor's IDM relevancy and other insignificant things
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-04-05 12:07daniel smithwhy palce such limits... can I not listen to aphex twin and ask for others ohonest and int
From:
daniel smith
To:
Erkki Rautio
Cc:
Date:
Sat, 05 Apr 1997 12:07:11 +0000
Subject:
(idm) Re: IDM relevancy and other insignificant things
permalink · <33464069.3A93@fastrans.net>
why palce such limits... can I not listen to aphex twin and ask for others ohonest and intel. opinions about it... on a world wide mailing list. sure, we are all bored with fsol, but they have had their day. I specifically aviod fsol because I see such negitive comments on this list, which I tend to respect to a point. so it forms a prejudice towards them, and rightly so! now, here's some things I have picked up recently... oh happy shoppig days! gescom & autechre - keynell (warp) metamatics - ep (clear) cylobian sunset - ep (replex) danny breaks - droppin science (universal language) symbiosis - spiritual technology (domestic) bochum welt - module 2 (replex) gerd - vulcan princess (universal language) so some of these stray ito drum n bass and breaks... but the relaxed rhythms are sweet. the buchem welt is one for which I had been searching. same with the matematics.... good shit! and the jimi tenor is okay, but I didnt buy it which may or maynot say something about the strength of his music. low fi for sure though. dan dan@fastrans.net
1997-04-05 19:36The Rare GuyOn Saturday, 05-Apr-97, daniel smith wrote [about (idm) Re: IDM relevancy and other insign
From:
The Rare Guy
To:
IDM
Date:
Sat, 05 Apr 1997 19:36:51 EST4EDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: IDM relevancy and other insignificant things
Reply to:
(idm) Re: IDM relevancy and other insignificant things
permalink · <yam7034.2583.130339480@clark.net>
On Saturday, 05-Apr-97, daniel smith wrote [about (idm) Re: IDM relevancy and other insignificant things]:
quoted 2 lines why palce such limits... can I not listen to aphex twin and ask for>why palce such limits... can I not listen to aphex twin and ask for >others ohonest and intel. opinions about it... on a world wide mailing
I think it should be renamed to Electronic Dance Music, other ppl I've spoken with agree with me, I think this is just too crazy people argueing over what is and what isn't IDM. Really, who cares? We all like the music.
quoted 3 lines list. sure, we are all bored with fsol, but they have had their day. I>list. sure, we are all bored with fsol, but they have had their day. I >specifically aviod fsol because I see such negitive comments on this >list, which I tend to respect to a point. so it forms a prejudice
argh.. You are missing out man.. If there were ever negative comments about FSOL, it was about the We Have Explosive single, but really FSOL is worth a listen, to me they are just awesome. on another note, I just picked up Rubber Johnny DrumRolyPoly, Squarepusher: Vic Acid (the sleeve looks like it was made on a Commodore Vic20? anyone?) and finally the Beck: The New Pollution single with Richard's Hairpiece.. I'll have a review of Vic Acid later.. -- __ __\ \ Aurafix aka Hillie / PHD ^ DAMONES (aka Rare Guy) / /_\ \ http://www.clark.net/pub/buh/index.html \_____/ >> buh@clark.net >> < > .. >> .<>> >> > , m7= inducing mindwaves.. electronic techno muuusik controlled manually by a p h e x t wi n .. .. . . .
1997-04-05 15:43Erkki RautioMy point to the relevancy of Jimi Tenor discussion on IDM list is this: I guess as long as
From:
Erkki Rautio
To:
anAlFiXation
Date:
Sat, 5 Apr 1997 15:43:19 +0300 (EET DST)
Subject:
(idm) Jimi Tenor's IDM relevancy and other insignificant things
permalink · <199704051243.PAA24466@vuokko.uta.fi>
My point to the relevancy of Jimi Tenor discussion on IDM list is this: I guess as long as Jimi Tenor releases his stuff on Warp Records, I think there is some connection with this list. And what do you think about Red Snapper - should we ban the discussion on them too? Hardly purist IDM as some people would like to limit the discussion on here. And I think as long as Gentle People are on Rephlex, someone may discuss them in the context of this list. What about AFX and Mu-ziq's lounge obsessions then? (I just got "Urmur Bile Trax Vol. 1" and it was funny to spot those Kingsley & Perrey samples on 'Saabtone M5'.) As long as IDM stays as a "Warphlex" list, we have to accept the fact that the labels themselves may want to move on, and I'm glad Warp and Rephlex have been daring enough to widen their scopes though this seems hardly be the case with everyone here. Folks, there is not such thing as "pure" IDM anymore (if there ever was); it has been perverted and already gone beyond recognition by such things as drum & bass, hip hop, electro, trip hop, lounge, jazz and whatever. And I'm glad this is so. It should be mentioned that Jimi Tenor himself hates the moniker 'lounge'. If you want one indication that he is able to go beyond that genre (if he has ever been really part of that one at all), just listen the last track, 'Atlantis', on "Intervision". He has mentioned this may be the direction he will go towards next. I understand for most people on this list Jimi Tenor must be some happy-go-lucky wannabe newcomer, but here in Finland we've followed his career over a decade now ever since he started with his industrial band The Shamans (The Industrialists With A Clue (TM) posse of this list may want to get those JT & His Shamans albums in their hands), eventually got fed up with banging his head to the wall and turned to something different altogether - and this was in the early 90s before easy listening had become the trendy genre as it is now. Jimi has proved himself to be an innovative musician and artist who doesn't exactly follow where everyone else is going to, and continues to do so. If you don't like his music and person, fair enough; all I I want promote here is open-mindedness. And all that talk about "authenticity" and originality and saying Jimi's got nothing new in his music is just hair-splitting: every artist is influenced by someone else. In the age of sampling this question will only become even more absurd, and in defense of Mr. Tenor it can even be said that all his sounds are created by himself, and not stolen from someone else's records - if that wouldn't sound like the arguments of those techno-bashing, "playing music with real instruments", rock'n'roll people... Maybe we should start a new thread about authenticity and originality in IDM - I guess that would be more fruitful than constant slagging and flame wars. np: Tony Drake - Texture (this is an amazing album, how come I dind't discover this one before.) ekku the maintainer of pHinnWeb - everything u ever wanted to know about Finnish techno scene but were too afraid of the reindeer trerra@uta.fi | http://www.uta.fi/~trerra | http://www.sci.fi/~phinnweb