179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) Dead Cities

9 messages · 7 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: (idm) dead cities · (idm) fsol
1997-04-04 04:04(idm) Dead Cities
├─ 1997-04-04 04:14a lifeform Re: (idm) Dead Cities
├─ 1997-04-04 04:16Brendan Swift Re: (idm) Dead Cities
└─ 1997-04-04 13:57The Rare Guy Re: (idm) Dead Cities
1997-04-04 14:02The Rare Guy Re: (idm) Dead Cities
└─ 1997-04-04 21:18paul hutcheson (idm) FSOL
1997-04-05 09:29Mathias Verraes Re: (idm) Dead Cities
└─ 1997-04-05 14:17Mikko Karvonen Re: (idm) Dead Cities
└─ 1997-04-05 11:29paul hutcheson Re: (idm) Dead Cities
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-04-04 04:04KaisrSolze@aol.comEveryone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't really like it-the h
From:
To:
Date:
Thu, 3 Apr 1997 23:04:29 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
(idm) Dead Cities
permalink · <970403230244_-1804917147@emout16.mail.aol.com>
Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't really like it-the hard tracks are too obvious (read "non-intelligent"), while the ambient tracks meander too much. Have I missed the point of the album, or is FSOL always like this, or is this just a bad album, or what? Is it worth getting some other FSOL album like Accelerator or LifeForms even if I don't like Dead Cities? If you disagree with me, explain why so I can take it into account when I give Dead Cities another listen. Thanks much Sam
1997-04-04 04:14a lifeform> ambient tracks meander too much. Have I missed the point of the album, or is > FSOL alwa
From:
a lifeform
To:
Date:
Thu, 3 Apr 1997 23:14:53 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Dead Cities
Reply to:
(idm) Dead Cities
permalink · <199704040414.XAA13047@housing1.stucen.gatech.edu>
quoted 2 lines ambient tracks meander too much. Have I missed the point of the album, or is> ambient tracks meander too much. Have I missed the point of the album, or is > FSOL always like this, or is this just a bad album, or what? Is it worth
It's not a bad album, to me anyways. I had the same opinion upon first hearing it... the hard tracks just grated away at me, so I stuck it on the shelf for 4 months before listening to it again. Then, one day, a friend of mine said he had heard a local radio station playing bits and pieces from Dead Cities, and said it sounded really fresh. So, I decided to give it another try, and for whatever reason, I began to like more and more of it. My personaly fav is the second track. (Starts out with the sample saying "I killed a man.... a man who looked like me.") I think this track is an absolute mind f*ck of a track. Stormin'. 'da Bomb.
quoted 3 lines getting some other FSOL album like Accelerator or LifeForms even if I don't> getting some other FSOL album like Accelerator or LifeForms even if I don't > like Dead Cities? If you disagree with me, explain why so I can take it into > account when I give Dead Cities another listen.
Well, if you start out with Accelerator (or even go back to the Jumpin' & Pumpin' compilation Earthbeat, which I managed to track down a couple years ago), you'll encounter more acid-house influenced tracks. Lifeforms caught the duo in full-on ambient/soundscape/samplerama mode, with 2 discs of complete and utter bliss when it hit my CD player. ISDN progressed on into the more hip-hop flavored beats, acid jazz riffs, and plenty more samplin' and tweakin'. I think Dead Cities is still keeping pace with their ever forward style, by mixing in more "hardcore" sounds with their nicer, more subtle texturing and ambience. It's a great blend, because I find it very hard to be bored while listening to the album. -- guyjr@ns.gt.ed.net | I.D.M.- That stage in sleeping when your feet are a.k.a., Guy Elden, Jr. | moving faster than your eyes.
1997-04-04 04:16Brendan SwiftOn Thu, 3 Apr 1997 KaisrSolze@aol.com wrote: > Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I ha
From:
Brendan Swift
To:
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 4 Apr 1997 16:16:30 +1200 (NZST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Dead Cities
Reply to:
(idm) Dead Cities
permalink · <Pine.OSF.3.91.970404161443.10604A-100000@mid-city.mcs.vuw.ac.nz>
On Thu, 3 Apr 1997 KaisrSolze@aol.com wrote:
quoted 11 lines Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't really> Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't really > like it-the hard tracks are too obvious (read "non-intelligent"), while the > ambient tracks meander too much. Have I missed the point of the album, or is > FSOL always like this, or is this just a bad album, or what? Is it worth > getting some other FSOL album like Accelerator or LifeForms even if I don't > like Dead Cities? If you disagree with me, explain why so I can take it into > account when I give Dead Cities another listen. > > Thanks much > Sam >
Accelerator is definitely worth a listen. Dare I say, it was probably oe of FSOL's best works. Try Amorphous Adrogenous if you can find it.... ?
1997-04-04 13:57The Rare GuyOn Friday, 04-Apr-97, KaisrSolze@aol.com wrote [about (idm) Dead Cities]: >Everyone keeps
From:
The Rare Guy
To:
IDM
Date:
Fri, 04 Apr 1997 13:57:46 EST4EDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Dead Cities
Reply to:
(idm) Dead Cities
permalink · <yam7033.2338.126475504@clark.net>
On Friday, 04-Apr-97, KaisrSolze@aol.com wrote [about (idm) Dead Cities]:
quoted 7 lines Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't really>Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't really >like it-the hard tracks are too obvious (read "non-intelligent"), while the >ambient tracks meander too much. Have I missed the point of the album, or is >FSOL always like this, or is this just a bad album, or what? Is it worth >getting some other FSOL album like Accelerator or LifeForms even if I don't >like Dead Cities? If you disagree with me, explain why so I can take it into >account when I give Dead Cities another listen.
When I first got Dead Cities, I found it to be a bit strange, the way they mix the drum'n'bass with ambient and such, but it didn't take too long before I realized that it was great. I definitely think you should listen to it again, and listen to it from beginning to end, not track by track. And you definitely should at least give Lifeforms a listen. IMO ISDN isn't all that great. -- __ __\ \ Aurafix aka Hillie / PHD ^ DAMONES (aka Rare Guy) / /_\ \ http://www.clark.net/pub/buh/index.html \_____/ >> buh@clark.net >> < > .. >> .<>> >> > , m7= inducing mindwaves.. electronic techno muuusik controlled manually by a p h e x t wi n .. .. . . .
1997-04-04 14:02The Rare GuyOn Friday, 04-Apr-97, a lifeform wrote [about Re: (idm) Dead Cities]: >I think Dead Cities
From:
The Rare Guy
To:
IDM
Date:
Fri, 04 Apr 1997 14:02:44 EST4EDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Dead Cities
permalink · <yam7033.2210.126475504@clark.net>
On Friday, 04-Apr-97, a lifeform wrote [about Re: (idm) Dead Cities]:
quoted 4 lines I think Dead Cities is still keeping pace with their ever forward style,>I think Dead Cities is still keeping pace with their ever forward style, >by mixing in more "hardcore" sounds with their nicer, more subtle texturing >and ambience. It's a great blend, because I find it very hard to be bored >while listening to the album.
One thing I found about Dead Cities is that is doesn't create the massive spaces that Lifeforms did. With Lifeforms it took you to different worlds. I guess that's because of the absence of environmental sounds and such, also the way the tracks are mixed together in Dead Cities.. -- __ __\ \ Aurafix aka Hillie / PHD ^ DAMONES (aka Rare Guy) / /_\ \ http://www.clark.net/pub/buh/index.html \_____/ >> buh@clark.net >> < > .. >> .<>> >> > , m7= inducing mindwaves.. electronic techno muuusik controlled manually by a p h e x t wi n .. .. . . .
1997-04-04 21:18paul hutchesonTo somebody who wanted to know about FSOL's earlier stuff (i can't remember who) and a goo
From:
paul hutcheson
To:
,
Date:
Sat, 05 Apr 1997 09:18:24 +1200
Subject:
(idm) FSOL
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Dead Cities
permalink · <3.0.1.32.19970405091824.0068e890@pop3.xtra.co.nz>
To somebody who wanted to know about FSOL's earlier stuff (i can't remember who) and a good tip in general: Find a music shop, get your intended purchase, and ask to listen to it. i brought a lot of good stuff this way, and avoided a Lot of garbage. most places should be happy to do it... Enjoy!
1997-04-05 09:29Mathias VerraesKaisrSolze@aol.com wrote: > Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and
From:
Mathias Verraes
To:
Indian Dynamic Mutations
Date:
Sat, 5 Apr 1997 11:29:46 +0200
Subject:
Re: (idm) Dead Cities
permalink · <199704051016.MAA15914@dns.glo.be>
KaisrSolze@aol.com wrote:
quoted 1 line Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't> Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't
really
quoted 1 line like it-> like it-
You don't really like it, ergo fsol = not idm ? (Let's not start this kind of discussion again, just take care of what you say everybody ;-) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ M a t h i a s V e r r a e s ET.Phone.Home@ThePentagon.com 'Aliquando praeterea rideo, jocor, ludo, homo sum' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1997-04-05 14:17Mikko KarvonenOn Sat, 5 Apr 1997, Mathias Verraes wrote: > KaisrSolze@aol.com wrote: > > Everyone keeps
From:
Mikko Karvonen
To:
Date:
Sat, 5 Apr 1997 14:17:06 +0300 (EET DST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Dead Cities
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Dead Cities
permalink · <Pine.GSO.3.95.970405141545.22324A-100000@sci.fi>
On Sat, 5 Apr 1997, Mathias Verraes wrote:
quoted 9 lines KaisrSolze@aol.com wrote:> KaisrSolze@aol.com wrote: > > Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't > really > > like it- > > You don't really like it, ergo fsol = not idm ? > > (Let's not start this kind of discussion again, just take care of what you > say everybody ;-)
Hey maybe FSOL isn't IDM at all but SDM (Stupid Dance Music). Eh eh me being real funny today. .Mikko
1997-04-05 11:29paul hutchesonAt 02:17 PM 4/5/97 +0300, you wrote: >On Sat, 5 Apr 1997, Mathias Verraes wrote: > >> Kais
From:
paul hutcheson
To:
,
Date:
Sat, 05 Apr 1997 23:29:23 +1200
Subject:
Re: (idm) Dead Cities
Reply to:
Re: (idm) Dead Cities
permalink · <3.0.1.32.19970405232923.00690440@pop3.xtra.co.nz>
At 02:17 PM 4/5/97 +0300, you wrote:
quoted 17 lines On Sat, 5 Apr 1997, Mathias Verraes wrote:>On Sat, 5 Apr 1997, Mathias Verraes wrote: > >> KaisrSolze@aol.com wrote: >> > Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't >> really >> > like it- >> >> You don't really like it, ergo fsol = not idm ? >> >> (Let's not start this kind of discussion again, just take care of what you >> say everybody ;-) > >Hey maybe FSOL isn't IDM at all but SDM (Stupid Dance Music). Eh eh me >being real funny today. > > > .Mikko
don't give up your day job. |}