179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Brendan Swift
To:
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 4 Apr 1997 16:16:30 +1200 (NZST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Dead Cities
Msg-Id:
<Pine.OSF.3.91.970404161443.10604A-100000@mid-city.mcs.vuw.ac.nz>
In-Reply-To:
<970403230244_-1804917147@emout16.mail.aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.9704.gz
On Thu, 3 Apr 1997 KaisrSolze@aol.com wrote:
quoted 11 lines Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't really> Everyone keeps hyping FSOL as IDM, but I have Dead Cities and I don't really > like it-the hard tracks are too obvious (read "non-intelligent"), while the > ambient tracks meander too much. Have I missed the point of the album, or is > FSOL always like this, or is this just a bad album, or what? Is it worth > getting some other FSOL album like Accelerator or LifeForms even if I don't > like Dead Cities? If you disagree with me, explain why so I can take it into > account when I give Dead Cities another listen. > > Thanks much > Sam >
Accelerator is definitely worth a listen. Dare I say, it was probably oe of FSOL's best works. Try Amorphous Adrogenous if you can find it.... ?