| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 2000-05-1204:11 | <Loptimiste@aol.com> | [idm] Fwd: [idm] Fwd: [idm] Re: Softsynths argh. did it again. sorry guys.
|
| 2000-05-1203:05 | <Loptimiste@aol.com> | [idm] Fwd: [idm] Re: Softsynths ack.. meant for the whole list.. sorry for the 2nd email josh.
|
| 2007-12-1503:43 | <EROTH001@aol.com> | [idm] anyone use Arturia softsynths? Just wondering what you think of them because some of them look… |
| 2000-01-1218:49 | Galen Beals <galenb@vinton.com> | (idm) Softsynths on a Mac I have seen a couple of posts
recently about whether or not… |
| 2000-05-1204:18 | Twine sound <twine_sound@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] Fwd: [idm] Re: Softsynths
>
>So many great ways of making/playing music, so little time, and… |
| 2007-12-1506:43 | Ed Hoc <meatsock@gmail.com> | Re: [idm] anyone use Arturia softsynths? they are almost as totally awesome as what you see (plus the… |
| 2000-05-1122:00 | <Loptimiste@aol.com> | [idm] Softsynths I've recently come to the conclusion that software synths are completely… |
| 2000-05-1203:58 | Twine sound <twine_sound@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] Fwd: [idm] Re: Softsynths
very good arguments either way...soft vs hardware.
i find, in my… |
| 2000-05-1202:36 | Joshua Brown <josh@undertone.com> | [idm] Re: Softsynths OK, I'll bite...
I sold my OB Xpander analog synth for… |
| 2000-05-1204:41 | Twine sound <twine_sound@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] Fwd: [idm] Re: Softsynths yeah, i think just about everyone considers themselves open minded...but not… |
| 2000-05-1205:01 | <Loptimiste@aol.com> | Re: [idm] Fwd: [idm] Re: Softsynths
In a message dated 5/12/00 12:41:41 AM, twine… |
| 2000-05-1205:12 | Twine sound <twine_sound@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] Fwd: [idm] Re: Softsynths IIM...now there's an idea...my first love electronically speaking was… |