| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 2000-04-1805:45 | Mark Fiorillo <mfiorillo@yahoo.com> | Re: [idm] detatched:inst. vs vocal To add another twist to this, one of my favorite vocal cds… |
| 2000-04-1806:00 | Daniel Laburu <laburu@bellsouth.net> | [idm] detatched:inst. vs vocal i think that the "detached" feeling you guys are talking about has… |
| 2000-04-1804:36 | <SOMA806@aol.com> | Re: [idm] detatched:inst. vs vocal I think that what most people are forgetting (or it could just… |
| 2000-04-1804:08 | <Gaiatekztur214@aol.com> | Re: [idm] detatched:inst. vs vocal yea...i know alLLLL of tha sheeeeeet ya'LLrrr feelin rite nowz… |
| 2000-04-1818:42 | zachary <zim200@is7.nyu.edu> | Re: [idm] detatched:inst. vs vocal >One period of music that I think is very interesting and one… |
| 2000-04-1814:23 | kurt <supine@bway.net> | [idm] detatched:inst. vs vocal >i think that the "detached" feeling you guys are talking about has… |
| 2000-04-1815:54 | Stevie <stevie@ignition.org.uk> | Re: [idm] detatched:inst. vs vocal > What I'm saying is that not all music can move you… |
| 2000-04-1806:29 | zachary <zim200@is7.nyu.edu> | Re: [idm] detatched:inst. vs vocal At 11:00 PM 4/17/0, Daniel Laburu wrote:
>i think… |