179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
Brian M. Cass
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:11:35 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
[idm] Cornfield; was Crunch
Msg-Id:
<200104102111.QAA24840@ionet.net>
Mbox:
idm.0104.gz
quoted 2 lines ...are much more> ...are much more > interesting, and Confield should top them all.
Because? I've been listening to the white labels for a bit, and while COnfield is in that progression Ae has been on about over the last few years, don't go for the future-tense hype. Booth and Brown know they've been crawling further up their own asses with each release, and Confield is just a few folds deeper. Fewer crunchy pubic hair sounds, lots more colonic bass :) Leave all the glowing hype for the more mainstream media, who will be so confused by Confield that they laud it a masterpiece. Want to talk interesting, talk the new Plaid. Laz --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org