179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Chris.Hilker
To:
Ironic Dance Music
Date:
Sun, 15 Jun 1997 13:52:57 -0700
Subject:
(idm) MiniDisc (was Akin's Comments on Digital Mastering)
Msg-Id:
<l03010d00afca060a6e82@[206.80.181.132]>
In-Reply-To:
<33A2C51D.73E7@dial.pipex.com>
Mbox:
idm.9706.gz
quoted 7 lines well, if an analogue beating professional digital>well, if an analogue beating professional digital >mastering/dissemination system ever gets released to the public, >it will be a godsend; perfect pitch stability, longevity, and TRUE >1 to 1 master cloning will make analoge die a death, and not before >time. What we want is a switch over to the next generation of audio >equipment that is not driven by the '2 pounds of baloney in a one pound >bag' mentality (Mini Disc / DCC).
I have to wonder what prompted Akin to mention MiniDisc - nobody sane considers it a professional digital mastering system. The relatively new four-track MD gear from Tascam and others is obviously targeted downmarket to amateurs putting together demo tapes who aren't ready for DAT but want something better than cassette. That's what MD is - "something better than cassette" for consumers and amateurs. I can record 75 minutes of stereo digital sound, with random access, shuffle play, programming, and the other features of CD. I can erase the disc and re-record it when I want something new to listen to on my walkman or in my car, ad infinitum, with no loss of fidelity each time I re-record. If I choose to record in mono, the capacity doubles to two and a half hours of music - and a lot of the older non-idm stuff I listen to is in mono anyway. The editing functions are terrific, too. Soundwise, MD is very good, especially compared to cassette. I don't need pro quality, and I don't use it for archival purposes, so it absolutely meets my needs. The ATRAC compression algorithm has gone through quite a few revisions (they're up to version 4.5 in the newest recorders) and now sounds much better than the earliest recorders (which caused many people to write the format off entirely) - in fact, I've seen an article on the web from a German hi-fi magazine that states that MD's sound is now equivalent to DAT. And most of the comments I've seen on the web state that ATRAC is noticeably better than MP3, especially in reproducing stereo imaging (my computer's sound output is shit so I can't do a head-to-head myself). BTW, ATRAC compression is used in Sony's SDDS cinema sound system, which many of you may have some experience with. C. -- C.Hilker (cspot@hyperreal.com) "We don't relax, we Rolex"