179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view

7 messages · 5 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: that question again. · that question again. - techno definition point of view
2003-04-07 17:23[idm] that question again.
└─ 2003-04-07 19:35Sogax Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
├─ 2003-04-07 16:50shift8 Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
└─ 2003-04-07 20:04EggyToast Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
└─ 2003-04-07 20:16Sogax Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
2003-04-07 20:12seeklektek Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
└─ 2003-04-07 20:31Sogax Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2003-04-07 17:23l.garcia@utoronto.caHi, Ok, I'm sure this question has been posted a million times, and it's answered on the F
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 13:23:47 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
[idm] that question again.
permalink · <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304071322510.14898-100000@log3.in.utoronto.ca>
Hi, Ok, I'm sure this question has been posted a million times, and it's answered on the FAQ as well, but bear with me... I'm doing some research here at U of Toronto, Canada, on discourses around techno in general: how different definitions from different sources intersect to create shared meaning within a group of participants. One of my case studies is on the IDM/Intelligent Techno/ Ambient Techno/Glitch nexus...so here's the question(s): What do these labels mean to you? (musically, philosophically, socially, etc.) Admittedly, I've been lurking around this stuff for longer than I care to admit, and I already have my own ideas of what they all mean, but my reason for posting this is to get some input from people who participate as producers and listeners, rather than getting all of my ideas from pop-music textbooks. Also, the rest of you are probably tired of reading posts about this topic, so I would encourage people to reply to me privately. Please give me a hand if you have a moment, thanks! Luis-Manuel Garcia --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2003-04-07 19:35SogaxHere's some of my thoughts about techno in general. What comes to IDM / braindance / glitc
From:
Sogax
To:
Date:
Mon, 07 Apr 2003 22:35:45 +0300
Subject:
Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
Reply to:
[idm] that question again.
permalink · <oprm9x1vu7l6zuz1@localhost>
Here's some of my thoughts about techno in general. What comes to IDM / braindance / glitch the point of view Sean Horton threw in other email was pretty good. I'd say IDM is just another term stuck from early days when FSOL, Aphex Twin and rest of Warpish stuff started pouring out. After 1988 summer, people were so full of ACID (music and the substance) that they needed to chill down. Finally when hardcore boom went over 300BPM and dancefloors started filling with speed-deaths; chillout sessions landed on techno culture permanently. A lot of evolution is to do with fact of people grewing old. As first generation of ravers, clubbers, promoters, DJs and producers finally realized they will end up as another MDMA/speed/gamma body on the dancefloor unless they eaze down. Also clubbers wanted to listen techno in home too, but after hard drug-induced nights hardbanging beat didn't work. They wanted to relax. Intelligence is just a word in IDM. To me IDM is stuff, which can fit both to dancefloor and home, but mainly toward home listening. But it's a grey area. Rephlex label laid a new somewhat elitistic term braindance to describe their IDM sound. Personally as an artist & producer I aim to sound, which kicks ass on a dancefloor, but has nuances for deeper listening. As I have explored many areas my sound is rather eclectic mixture from deep 'anything'. Philosophy, purity and point of view is another moniker describing 'something'. techno, house, electro, dnb with 'idm' flavour. IDM, ha who cares. UIDM, unintelligent dance music. I like Mr. X and Mr Y. Marusha rox too. Does that make me unintelligent? But if I listen also Susumu Yokota does that make me instantly intelligent? Does that really matter at all? Then lenghty about definition of techno and detroit techno. Not exactly IDM topic, but I gathered you focus also on electronic music & techno in generally. We don't want to be too puristic or do we? I'd say repetition with evolution and soul into sound can be intelligent, but in a different aspect. To generalize - IDM needs more conscious concentration to dig into deeper into sound. I call that an ACTIVE PROCESS. Detroit techno as Juan Atkins/Derrick May/Submerge/Axis/Tresor etc.. lay out repetitive sound, which has soul and slow evolution throughout sound. It goes immediately into your system (body & mind) and is more PASSIVE PROCESS. So repetition in detroit is more important than the taste and taste is more important than the repetition in IDM. Still both definitions; both styles aim to exactly same thing. To bypass that 7 second layer. To break conscious layer and open subconscious layer. I personally have defined some of my own stuff as in-troit or nu-troit as I can't really or don't want to categorise my sound. I just do, rest be the judge. To me idm may be many styles, not just 'idm'. I'd get rid of 'I(ntelligent) ' part. It is just too elitistic. I'd call IDM as DDM - Deeper Dance Music. (my own term) Many years ago I did listing for all electronic music genres. Out of interest and out of fun. Also been digging history. Listed couple hundred categories. Mostly just one-timers. Techno in early 90's had a very distinctive sound, but these days inside scene techno means also any electronic repetitive music. So, just like electronica eats kind of anything, 'techno' does the same to most of the people.   Some artist once said "true techno doesn't have any vocals". Hah. What a definition.   Categorising may be fun, but more interesting is to find links in history. Artists, labels and releases, which link together. Afterall it is the actual sound, music, clubs, raves and people who define the culture around ANY sound.   Debussy, 1920's Jazz, Javanese music, James Brown, Tangerine Dreams, Kraftwerk, Afrika Bambaata, Juan Atkins, Derrick May, 808 State, Jeff Mills, Aztec Mystics, Underground Resistance, The Advent, a guy called gerald, LFO, KLF, Junior Vasquez, Larry Levan, Back 2 Basics, Stakker, Joey Beltram, Josh Wink, Scan X, Luke Slater, Richie Hawtin, Cari Lekebusch, Nightmares on Wax, Horrorist, Adam Beyer, Speedy J, Inner City, Johannes Heil, Surgeon, Thomas Krome, Funk D'Void, Chris Liebing, Mauro Picotto, Dave Clarke, Der Dritte Raum, Carola, CJ Bolland, Umek, Kevin Saunderson, Carl Craig etc...     Don't forget DJ Hell if you seek puristic hard techno.     Submerge, Axis, Tresor, Transmat, Drumcode, Mo'Wax, R & S, Novamute, Plus 8, Metroplex, Basic Channel, Soma, Trope, Bush, Red Planet, Planet E, Iridite Production, Underground Resistance, Djax-Up, F Communications, Petra, Hardwax, Ovum, Peacefrog...   70's disco, acid House, club, house, F Communications sound, mainstream house   Rotterdam Terror Corps, dutch gabber, UK gabber, hardcore, happy hardcore, garage   detroit -> techno -> monotrack minimalism -> cologne     summer of 1988     Today, old-skool techno is not produced in that scale as in early 90's. Sound has moved into much delicate direction and is much eclectic. Going towards detroit and cologne sound and deeper stuff copies Warp, Rephlex, FSOL etc. turning into something else than techno.   Harder techno drops mostly under progressive house and hard house genres. Even harder sound turns into either hardcore or monotrack. Maybe modern Love Parade posse techno is closest to techno definition. but electro and retro sound tends to be the trend these days.   What is techno in retrospective?   Stakker - Humanoid is one of the first techno tracks to transfer that sound from underground to public arenas. MTV and Partyzone were one of the first messengers to mainstream audience. Modern techno has gone toward soulful qualities. More melody and more depth. But that is not a new phenomenom. Model 500 / Cybotron & other pioneers were influenced by 70's rock sound and Kraftwerk. Techno was very eclectic, experimenting and with 'soul' in early days. Gradually sound went rougher and rougher until 1988-1992 techno culture turned rapidly into a business just like any other music business. Sound divided roughly in to a 'home listening' and 'club music'. Some of the stuff is released as a vinyl only.   Technology to produce music has definitely had a great impact on sound. Now we have way more control with more ways to experiment than tens years ago. Yet, many follow relics. Respect relics and respect old ways, but do not be blinded by our sound ancestors. Progress; techno should be eclectic as well. Larry Levan and famous Paradise Garage club played very eclectic stuff from any genre from any music style if it just fit the set and reflected the mood of clubbers. Pompous Junior Vasquez with Twilo and Sound Factory has been doing the same these days. Music and sets were much eclectic.   Purism has conquered most of the clubs and events. There is hard house, house, detroit, trance, dnb, hip-hop and so on. All the clubs and artists want to distinct themselves to some genres.   We need genres as our guide. To set some sort of 'map' of music, but it is only a map.   Purism is sometimes a good thing, but we need to go back in history and bring back eclectic qualities. No genres, but musical collasions, which also challenge a listener & raver to some degree.   Techno as any genre is as said, a term, which adapts into a current set of music produced under 'techno' moniker. Releases, which stand out and which are remembered as techno classics define techno music. So all genres are really a one giant pile of mashed potatoes. IDM adapts in the same way, but many use that term as a garbage pile when they can't decipher the style of electronic sound.   Die hard ravechildren will always cheer when way too much played Jeff Mills - The Bells and billion remixes of it blasts that very distinct sound from the speakers. Classics are still played quite a lot as there's so much new unknown wannabe techno-DJ's who fell in love to same classic tunes as so many before them. Which is not necessarily bad as those classics bring back good memories from events you've heard them before.    Techno was melody oriented originally. Early trance was more techno than modern trance. Like Art Of Trance, Sven Väth and even Man With No Name. Those started out with stuff, which was sort of 'repetitive trance'. Just think of a classic trance track Octopussy for example.   Most of really dark very repetitive stuff goes into monotrack, which I think has replaced hardcore sound these days to a great degree. Oh, those days of Shadowland Terrorists and Thunderdome, Terrordrome, Mayday raves and many more. Cheesy Raveyard compilations and thousands of wannabe- artists banging hardcore sound out with Octamed tracker. C-Tank started out with Octamed. Oldie rumors.   Hardcore scene died the day Johnny Violent topped every other track by releasing Burnout. I laughed so hard when I first heard that tune in radio. Out of pure cheer. Check it out if you dig dancing to 20 million beats per minute. Still there seems to be enough niche market to indie hardcore labels to survive and a lot of people are into old-skool gabber. Noise is not dead and propably will ever be. Noise just is and punk never really dies as every generation finds their own 'punk'-culture. Techno with 'DIY' phenomenom in early days resembled and still does, a lot of punk culture in 70's and 80's. People just started doing shit and some good shit in their bedrooms and started doing small gigs in garages and small warehouses. They just go and do and do not care what other think. And where techno stops hardcore starts.   Hardcore, noise, gabber, jungle warfare, speedbass, speedcore etc have been influenced by punk culture, which has influenced hardcore rock/noise bands today. I think one of the best 'mainstream' examples is Atari Teenage Riot, which performs post punk/noise stuff. Singer is unfortunately dead, but their video's still rule big time. Just check RevolutionAction. Reminds a bit Come To Daddy by Aphex Twin. Ah, don't you just love movies Hellraiser and Hellraiser 2 (rest are not worth it)? Dunno where RDJ got his inspiration, but "Come To Daddy" is the slogan in first flick. "Come To Daddy, we won't hurt you". "are you teasing us? She's teasing us" Hyperreal IDM definition - quote "[Intelligent Dance Music] means the opposite of stupid hardcore." Yes, _stupid_ hardcore. IDM tends to flow into ambient direction and as said in that definition - works also in domestic environment = home listening. Still, some noise acts can be [idm]. Sound, which needs your effort. One could dispute whether idm sound is more about aesthetic or about artistic qualities. Is avant garde or abstract idm? Or just another form of 'art'. As same sound could be 'easy' or 'hard' depending on a listener. I really can't tell. But it's good to have some sort of paths around sound as rules or set of loose guidelines and categories are, as said, only a path, a skeleton to adjust our views about any culture or society-connection.   Then back to sound - techno sound to be specific Some oldie techno tracks: Acen - Trip 2 the Moon Altern 8 - Activ 8 Praga Khan - Move Your Body (Injected With a Poison)     Those go more into jungle/breakbeat direction as well, but early Prodigy, 2 Bad Mice, Jungle Brothers & rest influenced techno sound and vice versa. IDM sound is just one continuum and extension of 'simpler sound'. If you think, we are only 1st and 2nd generation raving, clubbing, DJ's, producing, promoting, discussing, researching still so young rave-culture and subcultures in and around it.   Some classic choons Phuture - Acid Tracks Joey Beltram - Energy Flash Juan Atkins - Infoworld LFO - LFO 808 State - Pacific Aztec Mystics - Jaguar Richie Hawtin - Orange Underground Resistance - Punisher Dave Clarke: Red 2 (Wisdom to the Wise) Derrick May - Strings of Life Red Planet - Star Dancer Suburban Knight - The Art of Stalking Luke Slater - Inductive Channels     and do not miss these classics   Robert Armani - Blow That Shit Out (Joey Beltram Remix) (from Blow It Out 2x12" / ACV)     Jeff Mills - The Bells (Purpose Maker) (maybe one of the most played tunes in raves throughout the years)   Josh Wink (aka Winx) - Higher State of Consciousness (Manifesto 12)   Scan X - Earthquake (Earthquake EP / F Communications)   Joey Beltram - Game Form (Tresor)   Choice - Acid Eiffel (Acid Eiffel / Fragile Records) by Laurent Garnier and not so known Ludovic Llorca)   Drexciya - Digital Tsunami (Tresor) RIP James Stinson     Point Blank - Meng's Theme (Joey Beltram remix) (Meng's Theme Remixes, R&S / RS 94 060, 12")   And couple very interesting not so known faces from detroit scene are Mark Grant and Boo Williams.   The Many Definitions of Techno - point of view   If I had to choose only one track to define TECHNO as of today ---   Best tune is impossible and unnecessary to choose, but one track, which grabs the essence of techno sound today in my opinion.     for me, it is Funk D'Void - Diabla (Kevin Saunderson Mix) (SOMA/SOMA 112R, 12") Released in 2001, but is one of the best techno tracks in recent years. A true classic. ----------------- Then bits and pieces about origins of sound and also some insight about jungle & drum'n'bass as IDM with broken beat is like a distant cousin for dnb sound and culture. Especially the chillout and experimental stuff. It is somewhat true that techno is based on sound more than artists. Also as long as our race stays pretty much same in evolution wise any repetition in any form will be fascinator number one. Because repetition induces trance and trance induces way to focus on ownself. Curiosity on our own mind is not likely to going to disappear anywhere. Also 135BPM is no coincidence. To average human who has heartbeat around ~60-70BPM, 130-135BPM is the most suitable heartbeat rate what comes to stamina. Also any movement in range of 2-4Hz is likely to induce trance state. That's what native tribes did and do. They used drugs as well and danced around camp fire, trying to get into trance. We haven't changed much in 10 000 years have we? there is only bassdrum, bassdrum is the key and the core, everything else is irrelevant. Bruce Lee once said "Before I studied the art, a punch was just a punch and a kick was just a kick. Once I began practicing the art, a punch was no longer a punch and a kick no longer just a kick. Once I understood the art a punch was just a punch and a kick was just a kick" (the Bruce Lee quote I haven't verified, but it was quoted by some individual in techno-scene related discussion forum) happy happy joy joy.. History of electronic music and drum'n'bass started around 19th century. Think about Beethoven, those compositions he made resemble a lot uplifting trance in a structure. Jazz was first considered as a phuturistic immoral (satanistic) music and was also much related to drugs. It became acceptable only after white folk started making same music for white community. Drum'n'bass has roots in hip-hop, rap and old rhytm'n'blues. First DJ's took 70's r'n'b and soul records and started experimenting with them. Most of classic breaks in drum'n'bass & jungle are originally ripped illegally from old records. James Brown was really pissed on that, but never saw any money. Amen break and Apache break are two most famous drumloops, which can be identified easily if you have been into scene for some time. My electronic music experiences started seriously in early 90's with old- skool jungle, italo-xtacy-techno and old-skool techno. Music, which was really really different in that time. It was like founding a new continent. BTW urban legend of origins for term jungle tells that members of Afrika Bambaata once tried to get a gig in some club. This happened most likely in the 80's. Club owner told that "we don't want your jungle music here." Using jungle as a mockery for any black music. Jungle and dnb can be identified as different genres, but these days people usually refer drum'n'bass to include all breaks stuff. It is a very eclectic genre. There is also mellow stuff if you are not into speedcore, speedbass or jungle warfare or UK garage mayhem. Artcore is a genre for jazzy influenced chillout jungle. Other eaze stuff is produced by ie. by LTJ Bukem, Boymerang, Blu Mar Ten and generally all stuff by Good Looking Records. To mention only some. Progression Sessions series by GLR is by far one of the best d'n'b series produced. In my opinion. If you are into more industrial flavored hard sound the genres to look are 2step or neurofunk. Bad Company is very famous for that sound. Other talented artists and labels to look are Ed Rush & Optical, Virus, Prototype and the legendary label Moving Shadow. From jungle side I could mention some legends such as Mickey Finn, Tom & Jerry, AK1200 and Congo Natty. 2-step was mainly invented to get sound, which would be easier to mix by DJ's. Main driver in most of 2step tunes is heavy snare with harsh bassline. Trance influenced mainstream d'n'b is the current trend. John B is one of the first to tamper with producing dnb with heavy trance leads in mainstream style. Some work, some don't. High Contrast - Passion is a very good example of modern 'mainstream' club drum'n'bass today. - But that's about these topics I have to say now. I know, more about techno and dnb than 'idm', but for example posting dnb stuff in dnb discussion list is mostly worthless as most of the readers know the stuff already. Bare such, thou shall be open minded. .] Sogax, Deliciound, www.deliciound.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2003-04-07 16:50shift8hey - thanks for the reminder of why i'm on *this* list... -s On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 15:35,
From:
shift8
To:
Sogax
Cc:
Date:
07 Apr 2003 12:50:32 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
Reply to:
Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
permalink · <1049734232.11170.33.camel@awtechuh>
hey - thanks for the reminder of why i'm on *this* list... -s On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 15:35, Sogax wrote:
quoted 381 lines Here's some of my thoughts about techno in general. What comes to IDM /> Here's some of my thoughts about techno in general. What comes to IDM / > braindance / glitch the point of view Sean Horton threw in other email was > pretty good. > > I'd say IDM is just another term stuck from early days when FSOL, Aphex > Twin and rest of Warpish stuff started pouring out. After 1988 summer, > people were so full of ACID (music and the substance) that they needed to > chill down. Finally when hardcore boom went over 300BPM and dancefloors > started filling with speed-deaths; chillout sessions landed on techno > culture permanently. > > A lot of evolution is to do with fact of people grewing old. As first > generation of ravers, clubbers, promoters, DJs and producers finally > realized they will end up as another MDMA/speed/gamma body on the > dancefloor unless they eaze down. Also clubbers wanted to listen techno in > home too, but after hard drug-induced nights hardbanging beat didn't work. > They wanted to relax. > > Intelligence is just a word in IDM. To me IDM is stuff, which can fit both > to dancefloor and home, but mainly toward home listening. But it's a grey > area. Rephlex label laid a new somewhat elitistic term braindance to > describe their IDM sound. > > Personally as an artist & producer I aim to sound, which kicks ass on a > dancefloor, but has nuances for deeper listening. As I have explored many > areas my sound is > rather eclectic mixture from deep 'anything'. Philosophy, purity and point > of view is > another moniker describing 'something'. techno, house, electro, dnb with > 'idm' flavour. > > IDM, ha who cares. UIDM, unintelligent dance music. I like Mr. X and Mr Y. > Marusha rox too. Does that make me unintelligent? But if I listen also > Susumu Yokota does that make me instantly intelligent? Does that really > matter at all? > > Then lenghty about definition of techno and detroit techno. Not exactly IDM > topic, but I gathered you focus also on electronic music & techno in > generally. We don't want to be too puristic or do we? I'd say repetition > with evolution > and soul into sound can be intelligent, but in a different aspect. > > To generalize - IDM needs more conscious concentration to dig into deeper > into sound. I call that an ACTIVE PROCESS. Detroit techno as Juan > Atkins/Derrick May/Submerge/Axis/Tresor etc.. lay out repetitive sound, > which has soul and slow evolution throughout sound. It goes immediately > into your system (body & mind) and is more PASSIVE PROCESS. So repetition > in detroit is more important than the taste and taste is more important > than the repetition in IDM. > > Still both definitions; both styles aim to exactly same thing. To bypass > that 7 second layer. To break conscious layer and open subconscious layer. > I personally have defined some of my own stuff as in-troit or nu-troit as I > can't really or don't want to categorise > my sound. I just do, rest be the judge. > > To me idm may be many styles, not just 'idm'. I'd get rid of 'I(ntelligent) > ' part. It is just too elitistic. I'd call IDM as DDM - Deeper Dance Music. > (my own term) > > Many years ago I did listing for all electronic music genres. Out of > interest and out of fun. Also been digging history. Listed couple hundred > categories. Mostly just one-timers. > > Techno in early 90's had a very distinctive sound, but these days inside > scene techno means also any electronic repetitive music. So, just like > electronica eats kind of anything, 'techno' does the same to most of the > people. > > Some artist once said "true techno doesn't have any vocals". Hah. What a > definition. > Categorising may be fun, but more interesting is to find links in history. > Artists, labels and releases, which link together. Afterall it is the > actual sound, music, clubs, raves and people who define the culture around > ANY sound. > > Debussy, 1920's Jazz, Javanese music, James Brown, Tangerine Dreams, > Kraftwerk, Afrika Bambaata, Juan Atkins, Derrick May, 808 State, Jeff > Mills, Aztec Mystics, Underground Resistance, The Advent, a guy called > gerald, LFO, KLF, Junior Vasquez, Larry Levan, Back 2 Basics, Stakker, Joey > Beltram, Josh Wink, Scan X, Luke Slater, Richie Hawtin, Cari Lekebusch, > Nightmares on Wax, Horrorist, Adam Beyer, Speedy J, Inner City, Johannes > Heil, Surgeon, Thomas Krome, Funk D'Void, Chris Liebing, Mauro Picotto, > Dave Clarke, Der Dritte Raum, Carola, CJ Bolland, Umek, Kevin Saunderson, > Carl Craig etc... > > Don't forget DJ Hell if you seek puristic hard techno. > > Submerge, Axis, Tresor, Transmat, Drumcode, Mo'Wax, R & S, Novamute, Plus > 8, Metroplex, Basic Channel, Soma, Trope, Bush, Red Planet, Planet E, > Iridite Production, Underground Resistance, Djax-Up, F Communications, > Petra, Hardwax, Ovum, Peacefrog... > 70's disco, acid House, club, house, F Communications sound, mainstream > house > Rotterdam Terror Corps, dutch gabber, UK gabber, hardcore, happy hardcore, > garage > detroit -> techno -> monotrack minimalism -> cologne > > summer of 1988 > > Today, old-skool techno is not produced in that scale as in early 90's. > Sound has moved into much delicate direction and is much eclectic. Going > towards detroit and cologne sound and deeper stuff copies Warp, Rephlex, > FSOL etc. turning into something else than techno. > Harder techno drops mostly under progressive house and hard house genres. > Even harder sound turns into either hardcore or monotrack. Maybe modern > Love Parade posse techno is closest to techno definition. but electro and > retro sound tends to be the trend these days. > > What is techno in retrospective? > > Stakker - Humanoid is one of the first techno tracks to transfer that sound > from underground to public arenas. MTV and Partyzone were one of the first > messengers to mainstream audience. > > Modern techno has gone toward soulful qualities. More melody and more > depth. But that is not a new phenomenom. Model 500 / Cybotron & other > pioneers were influenced by 70's rock sound and Kraftwerk. Techno was very > eclectic, experimenting and with 'soul' in early days. Gradually sound went > rougher and rougher until 1988-1992 techno culture turned rapidly into a > business just like any other music business. Sound divided roughly in to a > 'home listening' and 'club music'. Some of the stuff is released as a vinyl > only. > > Technology to produce music has definitely had a great impact on sound. Now > we have way more control with more ways to experiment than tens years ago. > Yet, many follow relics. Respect relics and respect old ways, but do not be > blinded by our sound ancestors. Progress; techno should be eclectic as > well. Larry Levan and famous Paradise Garage club played very eclectic > stuff from any genre from any music style if it just fit the set and > reflected the mood of clubbers. Pompous Junior Vasquez with Twilo and Sound > Factory has been doing the same these days. Music and sets were much > eclectic. > > Purism has conquered most of the clubs and events. There is hard house, > house, detroit, trance, dnb, hip-hop and so on. All the clubs and artists > want to distinct themselves to some genres. > > We need genres as our guide. To set some sort of 'map' of music, but it is > only a map. > Purism is sometimes a good thing, but we need to go back in history and > bring back eclectic qualities. No genres, but musical collasions, which > also challenge a listener & raver to some degree. > > Techno as any genre is as said, a term, which adapts into a current set of > music produced under 'techno' moniker. Releases, which stand out and which > are remembered as techno classics define techno music. So all genres are > really a one giant pile of mashed potatoes. IDM adapts in the same way, but > many use that term as a garbage pile when they can't decipher the style of > electronic sound. > > Die hard ravechildren will always cheer when way too much played Jeff Mills > - The Bells and billion remixes of it blasts that very distinct sound from > the speakers. Classics are still played quite a lot as there's so much new > unknown wannabe techno-DJ's who fell in love to same classic tunes as so > many before them. Which is not necessarily bad as those classics bring back > good memories from events you've heard them before. > > Techno was melody oriented originally. Early trance was more techno than > modern trance. Like Art Of Trance, Sven Väth and even Man With No Name. > Those started out with stuff, which was sort of 'repetitive trance'. Just > think of a classic trance track Octopussy for example. > > Most of really dark very repetitive stuff goes into monotrack, which I > think has replaced hardcore sound these days to a great degree. Oh, those > days of Shadowland Terrorists and Thunderdome, Terrordrome, Mayday raves > and many more. Cheesy Raveyard compilations and thousands of wannabe- > artists banging hardcore sound out with Octamed tracker. C-Tank started out > with Octamed. Oldie rumors. > > Hardcore scene died the day Johnny Violent topped every other track by > releasing Burnout. I laughed so hard when I first heard that tune in > radio. Out of pure cheer. Check it out if you dig dancing to 20 million > beats per minute. Still there seems to be enough niche market to indie > hardcore labels to survive and a lot of people are into old-skool gabber. > > Noise is not dead and propably will ever be. Noise just is and punk never > really dies as every generation finds their own 'punk'-culture. Techno with > 'DIY' phenomenom in early days resembled and still does, a lot of punk > culture in 70's and 80's. People just started doing shit and some good shit > in their bedrooms and started doing small gigs in garages and small > warehouses. They just go and do and do not care what other think. > > And where techno stops hardcore starts. > > Hardcore, noise, gabber, jungle warfare, speedbass, speedcore etc have been > influenced by punk culture, which has influenced hardcore rock/noise bands > today. I think one of the best 'mainstream' examples is Atari Teenage Riot, > which performs post punk/noise stuff. Singer is unfortunately dead, but > their video's still rule big time. Just check RevolutionAction. Reminds a > bit Come To Daddy by Aphex Twin. Ah, don't you just love movies Hellraiser > and Hellraiser 2 (rest are not worth it)? Dunno where RDJ got his > inspiration, but "Come To Daddy" is the slogan in first flick. "Come To > Daddy, we won't hurt you". "are you teasing us? She's teasing us" > > Hyperreal IDM definition - quote "[Intelligent Dance Music] means the > opposite of stupid hardcore." > > Yes, _stupid_ hardcore. IDM tends to flow into ambient direction and as > said > in that definition - works also in domestic environment = home listening. > > Still, some noise acts can be [idm]. Sound, which needs your effort. > One could dispute whether idm sound is more about aesthetic or about > artistic qualities. > Is avant garde or abstract idm? Or just another form of 'art'. As same > sound could be > 'easy' or 'hard' depending on a listener. > > I really can't tell. But it's good to have some sort of paths around sound > as rules or > set of loose guidelines and categories are, as said, only a path, a > skeleton to adjust > our views about any culture or society-connection. > > > Then back to sound - techno sound to be specific > Some oldie techno tracks: > > Acen - Trip 2 the Moon Altern 8 - Activ 8 Praga Khan - Move Your Body > (Injected With a Poison) > > Those go more into jungle/breakbeat direction as well, but early Prodigy, 2 > Bad Mice, Jungle Brothers & rest influenced techno sound and vice versa. > IDM sound is just one continuum and extension of 'simpler sound'. > > If you think, we are only 1st and 2nd generation raving, clubbing, DJ's, > producing, > promoting, discussing, researching still so young rave-culture and > subcultures in > and around it. > > Some classic choons > Phuture - Acid Tracks > Joey Beltram - Energy Flash > Juan Atkins - Infoworld > LFO - LFO > 808 State - Pacific Aztec Mystics - Jaguar > Richie Hawtin - Orange > Underground Resistance - Punisher Dave Clarke: Red 2 (Wisdom to the Wise) > Derrick May - Strings of Life > Red Planet - Star Dancer Suburban Knight - The Art of Stalking > Luke Slater - Inductive Channels > > and do not miss these classics > > Robert Armani - Blow That Shit Out (Joey Beltram Remix) (from Blow It Out > 2x12" / ACV) > > Jeff Mills - The Bells (Purpose Maker) (maybe one of the most played tunes > in raves throughout the years) > > Josh Wink (aka Winx) - Higher State of Consciousness (Manifesto 12) > > Scan X - Earthquake (Earthquake EP / F Communications) > > Joey Beltram - Game Form (Tresor) > > Choice - Acid Eiffel (Acid Eiffel / Fragile Records) by Laurent Garnier and > not so known Ludovic Llorca) > > Drexciya - Digital Tsunami (Tresor) RIP James Stinson > > Point Blank - Meng's Theme (Joey Beltram remix) (Meng's Theme Remixes, R&S > / RS 94 060, 12") > > And couple very interesting not so known faces from detroit scene are Mark > Grant and Boo Williams. > > The Many Definitions of Techno - point of view > > If I had to choose only one track to define TECHNO as of today --- > > Best tune is impossible and unnecessary to choose, but one track, which > grabs the essence of techno sound today in my opinion. > > for me, it is Funk D'Void - Diabla (Kevin Saunderson Mix) (SOMA/SOMA 112R, > 12") > Released in 2001, but is one of the best techno tracks in recent years. A > true classic. > > ----------------- > Then bits and pieces about origins of sound and also some insight about > jungle & drum'n'bass as IDM with broken beat is like a distant cousin for > dnb sound and culture. Especially the chillout and experimental stuff. > > It is somewhat true that techno is based on sound more than artists. Also > as long as our race stays pretty much same in evolution wise any repetition > in any form will be fascinator number one. > > Because repetition induces trance and trance induces way to focus on > ownself. Curiosity on our own mind is not likely to going to disappear > anywhere. > Also 135BPM is no coincidence. To average human who has heartbeat around > ~60-70BPM, 130-135BPM is the most suitable heartbeat rate what comes to > stamina. Also any movement in range of 2-4Hz is likely to induce trance > state. > > That's what native tribes did and do. They used drugs as well and danced > around camp fire, trying to get into trance. We haven't changed much in 10 > 000 years have we? there is only bassdrum, bassdrum is the key and the > core, everything else is irrelevant. > > Bruce Lee once said "Before I studied the art, a punch was just a punch and > a kick was just a kick. Once I began practicing the art, a punch was no > longer a punch and a kick no longer just a kick. Once I understood the art > a punch was just a punch and a kick was just a kick" > > (the Bruce Lee quote I haven't verified, but it was quoted by some > individual in > techno-scene related discussion forum) > > happy happy joy joy.. History of electronic music and drum'n'bass started > around 19th century. Think about Beethoven, those compositions he made > resemble a lot uplifting trance in a structure. > > Jazz was first considered as a phuturistic immoral (satanistic) music and > was also much related to drugs. It became acceptable only after white folk > started making same music for white community. > > Drum'n'bass has roots in hip-hop, rap and old rhytm'n'blues. First DJ's > took 70's r'n'b and soul records and started experimenting with them. Most > of classic breaks in drum'n'bass & jungle are originally ripped illegally > from old records. James Brown was really pissed on that, but never saw any > money. Amen break and Apache break are two most famous drumloops, which can > be identified easily if you have been into scene for some time. > > My electronic music experiences started seriously in early 90's with old- > skool jungle, italo-xtacy-techno and old-skool techno. Music, which was > really really different in that time. It was like founding a new continent. > > BTW urban legend of origins for term jungle tells that members of Afrika > Bambaata once tried to get a gig in some club. This happened most likely in > the 80's. Club owner told that "we don't want your jungle music here." > Using jungle as a mockery for any black music. > > Jungle and dnb can be identified as different genres, but these days people > usually refer drum'n'bass to include all breaks stuff. It is a very > eclectic genre. There is also mellow stuff if you are not into speedcore, > speedbass or jungle warfare or UK garage mayhem. > > Artcore is a genre for jazzy influenced chillout jungle. Other eaze stuff > is produced by ie. by LTJ Bukem, Boymerang, Blu Mar Ten and generally all > stuff by Good Looking Records. To mention only some. > > Progression Sessions series by GLR is by far one of the best d'n'b series > produced. In my > opinion. If you are into more industrial flavored hard sound the genres to > look are 2step or neurofunk. Bad Company is very famous for that sound. > Other talented artists and labels to look are Ed Rush & Optical, Virus, > Prototype and the legendary label Moving Shadow. > > >From jungle side I could mention some legends such as Mickey Finn, Tom & > Jerry, AK1200 and Congo Natty. > > 2-step was mainly invented to get sound, which would be easier to mix by > DJ's. Main driver in most of 2step tunes is heavy snare with harsh > bassline. Trance influenced mainstream d'n'b is the current trend. John B > is one of the first to tamper with producing dnb with heavy trance leads in > mainstream style. Some work, some don't. > > High Contrast - Passion is a very good example of modern 'mainstream' club > drum'n'bass today. > > - > > But that's about these topics I have to say now. I know, more about techno > and dnb than 'idm', but for example posting dnb stuff in dnb discussion > list is mostly worthless as most of the readers know the stuff already. > > Bare such, thou shall be open minded. > > .] > > Sogax, Deliciound, www.deliciound.net > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2003-04-07 20:04EggyToastSogax said: > IDM, ha who cares. UIDM, unintelligent dance music. I like Mr. X and Mr > Y.
From:
EggyToast
To:
Date:
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:04:51 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
Reply to:
Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
permalink · <50844.128.220.50.51.1049745891.squirrel@www.eggtastic.com>
Sogax said:
quoted 1 line IDM, ha who cares. UIDM, unintelligent dance music. I like Mr. X and> IDM, ha who cares. UIDM, unintelligent dance music. I like Mr. X and
Mr
quoted 2 lines Y. Marusha rox too. Does that make me unintelligent? But if I listen> Y. Marusha rox too. Does that make me unintelligent? But if I listen > also Susumu Yokota does that make me instantly intelligent? Does
that
quoted 1 line really matter at all?> really matter at all?
No, a bit off. IDM may stand for intelligent dance music, but the etymology of our intelligent is based on the *other* meaning of intelligence. Namely, "Secret information, especially about an actual or potential enemy." derek -- eggytoast.com - eggtastic.com ------ it's in your grocer's freezer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2003-04-07 20:16SogaxOn Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:04:51 -0500 (EST), EggyToast <eggy@eggtastic.com> wrote: > Sogax sai
From:
Sogax
To:
Date:
Mon, 07 Apr 2003 23:16:08 +0300
Subject:
Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
Reply to:
Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
permalink · <oprm9zw6ahl6zuz1@localhost>
On Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:04:51 -0500 (EST), EggyToast <eggy@eggtastic.com> wrote:
quoted 16 lines Sogax said:> Sogax said: >> IDM, ha who cares. UIDM, unintelligent dance music. I like Mr. X and > Mr >> Y. Marusha rox too. Does that make me unintelligent? But if I listen >> also Susumu Yokota does that make me instantly intelligent? Does > that >> really matter at all? > > No, a bit off. IDM may stand for intelligent dance music, but the > etymology of our intelligent is based on the *other* meaning of > intelligence. > > Namely, "Secret information, especially about an actual or potential > enemy." > > derek
Provocation is a nice hobby. ;) But on a serious note you have a point there. Human creature is built with two basic principles. To breed and to survive. Anything beyond is a creative action. So music or any experience, which pokes you or stirs your mind more than usually - creates a tension. Our insticts get sharper and our nature is to be prepared for an enemy. Any obstacle can be therefore observed as an enemy. then purely absurdity :P So if Mr. X and Mr. Y pump their sound into me and I happy join them without resistance I just adapt into nature but with more provocative sound I need patience to decipher 'the message'. Mainstream is your friend. Deep stuff is your enemy. At the end both can be adapted. The problem or blessing is that the deeper you go into intellect, deeper you dip into your mind, the more you begin to demand. There is no way back into dullness. Not without lobotomy. So deeper the experience goes the more control the experience has from our psyche. IDM is a weapon in right hands. Hehe.. My goal is to create army of brainchildren via sound. Hyptonising masses to be aware. Maybe RDJ does the same. Hypnotizing society. .peace :) Sogax --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2003-04-07 20:12seeklektekFrom: "Sogax" > BTW urban legend of origins for term jungle tells that members of Afrika >
From:
seeklektek
To:
, Sogax
Date:
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 13:12:42 -0700
Subject:
Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
permalink · <152601c2fd42$0bfd3e50$af55e40c@obelisk>
From: "Sogax"
quoted 2 lines BTW urban legend of origins for term jungle tells that members of Afrika> BTW urban legend of origins for term jungle tells that members of Afrika > Bambaata once tried to get a gig in some club.
Urban legand????????? Great: good idea: keep spreading the b.s.: http://www.press.uillinois.edu/s00/brunvand.html "Never let a bad story stand in the way of the truth." Afrika Bambaataa is one person, not a group!!!!!!!!!!!! http://www.zulunation.com/AFRIKA_BAMBAATAA_KOOL_2.gif Afrika Bambaataa never ~tried~ to get gigs. He's never had to ask anyone to let him play: people ~want~ him to play - they want to hear him play - and that's been the ~fact~ for more than 20 years. =seek= --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2003-04-07 20:31SogaxThanks for correcting. Words indeed are worlds so 'rumour' is a better substitute for 'urb
From:
Sogax
To:
Date:
Mon, 07 Apr 2003 23:31:25 +0300
Subject:
Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
Reply to:
Re: [idm] that question again. - techno definition point of view
permalink · <oprm90mnoxl6zuz1@localhost>
Thanks for correcting. Words indeed are worlds so 'rumour' is a better substitute for 'urban legend'. I admit, I know more about dnb and detroit techno than roots of electro and only reference to the origins of term 'jungle' I read from the book called 'History of Rap & Hip Hop'. A finnish book, where Bambaata & related folks were referred as a group. I've always dug Afrika Bambaataa sound and Planet Rock was one of the first tunes along with Kraftwerk sound, which got me into electronic music in the first hand. Video still rocks btw. Hmmm.. actually the viewpoint of AB as being group derives most likely from that tune Planet Rock, which was done by Afrika Bambaataa & the Soulsonic Force. Now correct me if I remember that one wrong. Also I think there was some compilation or sorts by Afrika Bambaataa and & Family. ah well, can't know all, now can we ;) (omniscience, omnipurity, omnicreatures) :] . On Mon, 7 Apr 2003 13:12:42 -0700, seeklektek <eclectic@attbi.com> wrote:
quoted 27 lines From: "Sogax"> From: "Sogax" > >> BTW urban legend of origins for term jungle tells that members of Afrika >> Bambaata once tried to get a gig in some club. > > > Urban legand????????? Great: good idea: keep spreading the b.s.: > http://www.press.uillinois.edu/s00/brunvand.html > > "Never let a bad story stand in the way of the truth." > > Afrika Bambaataa is one person, not a group!!!!!!!!!!!! > http://www.zulunation.com/AFRIKA_BAMBAATAA_KOOL_2.gif > > Afrika Bambaataa never ~tried~ to get gigs. He's never had to ask anyone > to let him play: people ~want~ him to play - they want to hear him play - > and that's been the ~fact~ for more than 20 years. > > > =seek= > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org