179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

[idm] la times idm article 4/8/01

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
2001-04-08 17:12Ray Lind (Cafe) [idm] la times idm article 4/8/01
2001-04-08 17:30brian rachielles Re: [idm] la times idm article 4/8/01
└─ 2001-04-08 20:06Lander Re: [idm] la times idm article 4/8/01
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2001-04-08 17:12Ray Lind (Cafe)ok, so who's read it? a bit of a shock for me to have the la times so comfortably throw id
From:
Ray Lind (Cafe)
To:
Date:
Sun, 8 Apr 2001 13:12:06 -0400
Subject:
[idm] la times idm article 4/8/01
permalink · <F9A9CC672C8BD4118C9F009027A15DB7A8D928@exchange04.borders.com>
ok, so who's read it? a bit of a shock for me to have the la times so comfortably throw idm into their "pop music" section coverage. overall fairly balanced and informed (stuff on matmos, kid 606, etc) although there were a couple of stretches (ae took "the base that aphex twin was working from and pushed even harder against sonic boundaries to invent new noises") and inaccuracies ("aphex twin's 'artificial intelligence' record"). I dunno, I've kinda always held that ae & afx started off on divergent paths and to say that ae only built on what afx offered up is a bit glossy. still, a fun article. with organic '96 heralding a wave of 'electronica' media coverage in socal, perhaps we'll be seeing something similar with coachella, ae in may, bjork/matmos, etc. should be interesting... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-04-08 17:30brian rachielleswell, i've just read it myself. overall i guess it's not bad. unfortunate about the aphex/
From:
brian rachielles
To:
Date:
Sun, 8 Apr 2001 10:30:21 -0700
Subject:
Re: [idm] la times idm article 4/8/01
permalink · <000701c0c051$974a8060$a4d91e40@pc>
well, i've just read it myself. overall i guess it's not bad. unfortunate about the aphex/artificial intelligence thing... those words certainly didn't come out of my mouth. brian rachielles clickpop@hyperreal.org idm-l admin
quoted 3 lines ok, so who's read it? a bit of a shock for me to have the la times so> ok, so who's read it? a bit of a shock for me to have the la times so > comfortably throw idm into their "pop music" section coverage. overall > fairly balanced and informed (stuff on matmos, kid 606, etc) although
there
quoted 2 lines were a couple of stretches (ae took "the base that aphex twin was working> were a couple of stretches (ae took "the base that aphex twin was working > from and pushed even harder against sonic boundaries to invent new
noises")
quoted 6 lines and inaccuracies ("aphex twin's 'artificial intelligence' record"> and inaccuracies ("aphex twin's 'artificial intelligence' record"). I > dunno, I've kinda always held that ae & afx started off on divergent paths > and to say that ae only built on what afx offered up is a bit glossy. > still, a fun article. > > with organic '96 heralding a wave of 'electronica' media coverage in
socal,
quoted 4 lines perhaps we'll be seeing something similar with coachella, ae in may,> perhaps we'll be seeing something similar with coachella, ae in may, > bjork/matmos, etc. > > should be interesting...
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2001-04-08 20:06LanderThat article is actually online, if anyone else wants to read it... http://www.latimes.com
From:
Lander
To:
Date:
Sun, 8 Apr 2001 13:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: [idm] la times idm article 4/8/01
Reply to:
Re: [idm] la times idm article 4/8/01
permalink · <20010408200635.15387.qmail@web11101.mail.yahoo.com>
That article is actually online, if anyone else wants to read it... http://www.latimes.com/news/asection/20010408/t000029867.html --- brian rachielles <clickpop@hyperreal.org> wrote:
quoted 37 lines well, i've just read it myself. overall i guess it's not bad.> well, i've just read it myself. overall i guess it's not bad. > unfortunate about the aphex/artificial intelligence thing... > those words certainly didn't come out of my mouth. > > brian rachielles > clickpop@hyperreal.org > idm-l admin > > > > ok, so who's read it? a bit of a shock for me to have the la times so > > comfortably throw idm into their "pop music" section coverage. > overall > > fairly balanced and informed (stuff on matmos, kid 606, etc) although > there > > were a couple of stretches (ae took "the base that aphex twin was > working > > from and pushed even harder against sonic boundaries to invent new > noises") > > and inaccuracies ("aphex twin's 'artificial intelligence' record"). I > > dunno, I've kinda always held that ae & afx started off on divergent > paths > > and to say that ae only built on what afx offered up is a bit glossy. > > still, a fun article. > > > > with organic '96 heralding a wave of 'electronica' media coverage in > socal, > > perhaps we'll be seeing something similar with coachella, ae in may, > > bjork/matmos, etc. > > > > should be interesting... > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org >
===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org