well, i've just read it myself. overall i guess it's not bad.
unfortunate about the aphex/artificial intelligence thing...
those words certainly didn't come out of my mouth.
brian rachielles
clickpop@hyperreal.org
idm-l admin
quoted 3 lines ok, so who's read it? a bit of a shock for me to have the la times so> ok, so who's read it? a bit of a shock for me to have the la times so
> comfortably throw idm into their "pop music" section coverage. overall
> fairly balanced and informed (stuff on matmos, kid 606, etc) although
there
quoted 2 lines were a couple of stretches (ae took "the base that aphex twin was working> were a couple of stretches (ae took "the base that aphex twin was working
> from and pushed even harder against sonic boundaries to invent new
noises")
quoted 6 lines and inaccuracies ("aphex twin's 'artificial intelligence' record"> and inaccuracies ("aphex twin's 'artificial intelligence' record"). I
> dunno, I've kinda always held that ae & afx started off on divergent paths
> and to say that ae only built on what afx offered up is a bit glossy.
> still, a fun article.
>
> with organic '96 heralding a wave of 'electronica' media coverage in
socal,
quoted 4 lines perhaps we'll be seeing something similar with coachella, ae in may,> perhaps we'll be seeing something similar with coachella, ae in may,
> bjork/matmos, etc.
>
> should be interesting...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org