179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: (idm) IMHO: Is it necessary? [was new Omni Trio?]

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1999-09-27 15:06Dave Segal Re: (idm) IMHO: Is it necessary? [was new Omni Trio?]
1999-09-27 15:08chad mossholder Re: (idm) IMHO: Is it necessary? [was new Omni Trio?]
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-09-27 15:06Dave Segal>Afraid I have to disagree. There's a couple of good tracks, but the rest is >really water
From:
Dave Segal
To:
Date:
Mon, 27 Sep 1999 11:06:08 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) IMHO: Is it necessary? [was new Omni Trio?]
permalink · <19990927145924.13791.qmail@hyperreal.org>
quoted 7 lines Afraid I have to disagree. There's a couple of good tracks, but the rest is>Afraid I have to disagree. There's a couple of good tracks, but the rest is >really watered down, weak, boring drum'n'bass. The Deepest Cut contianed >some absolute all time d'n'b classics, Haunted Science was really good, >Skeleton Keys was OK but never did much for me, and this...well, it's the >first omni trio I wish I hadn't bothered buying. :( > >All IMHO of course.
The IMHO acronym should be put to rest. I know it's Internet protocol, but we should all realize that anything re: musical taste that anybody posts is "IMHO." To keep using it insults one's intelligence. Like, if you didn't use "IMHO" we would assume that what you're posting is undisputable fact? Don't mind me, I'm just an editor who thinks too much about these kinds of things. Dave Segal Managing Editor/Alternative Press Reviews/BPM/Reissue Redux/Origins Of Cool Secret Ions on WCSB Thursdays 9-11PM EST www.wcsb.org
1999-09-27 15:08chad mossholderDave is right *IMHO* :) Chad . . . >From: "Dave Segal" <segal@altpress.com> >To: idm@hyper
From:
chad mossholder
To:
,
Date:
Mon, 27 Sep 1999 10:08:13 CDT
Subject:
Re: (idm) IMHO: Is it necessary? [was new Omni Trio?]
permalink · <19990927150814.77800.qmail@hotmail.com>
Dave is right *IMHO* :) Chad . . .
quoted 28 lines From: "Dave Segal" <segal@altpress.com>>From: "Dave Segal" <segal@altpress.com> >To: idm@hyperreal.org >Subject: Re: (idm) IMHO: Is it necessary? [was new Omni Trio?] >Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 11:06:08 -0400 > > >Afraid I have to disagree. There's a couple of good tracks, but the rest >is > >really watered down, weak, boring drum'n'bass. The Deepest Cut contianed > >some absolute all time d'n'b classics, Haunted Science was really good, > >Skeleton Keys was OK but never did much for me, and this...well, it's the > >first omni trio I wish I hadn't bothered buying. :( > > > >All IMHO of course. > >The IMHO acronym should be put to rest. I know it's Internet protocol, >but we should all realize that anything re: musical taste that anybody >posts >is "IMHO." To keep using it insults one's intelligence. Like, if you didn't >use >"IMHO" we would assume that what you're posting is undisputable fact? >Don't mind me, I'm just an editor who thinks too much about these kinds of >things. > >Dave Segal >Managing Editor/Alternative Press >Reviews/BPM/Reissue Redux/Origins Of Cool >Secret Ions on WCSB Thursdays 9-11PM EST www.wcsb.org >
______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com