Re: (idm) IMHO: Is it necessary? [was new Omni Trio?]
Msg-Id:
<19990927145924.13791.qmail@hyperreal.org>
Mbox:
idm.9909.gz
quoted 7 lines Afraid I have to disagree. There's a couple of good tracks, but the rest is>Afraid I have to disagree. There's a couple of good tracks, but the rest is
>really watered down, weak, boring drum'n'bass. The Deepest Cut contianed
>some absolute all time d'n'b classics, Haunted Science was really good,
>Skeleton Keys was OK but never did much for me, and this...well, it's the
>first omni trio I wish I hadn't bothered buying. :(
>
>All IMHO of course.
The IMHO acronym should be put to rest. I know it's Internet protocol,
but we should all realize that anything re: musical taste that anybody posts
is "IMHO." To keep using it insults one's intelligence. Like, if you didn't
use
"IMHO" we would assume that what you're posting is undisputable fact?
Don't mind me, I'm just an editor who thinks too much about these kinds of
things.
Dave Segal
Managing Editor/Alternative Press
Reviews/BPM/Reissue Redux/Origins Of Cool
Secret Ions on WCSB Thursdays 9-11PM EST www.wcsb.org