179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) re: cubase

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 3 days · search this subject
1999-03-22 03:56Joshua Reuven (idm) re: cubase
└─ 1999-03-25 01:18Mark Kolmar Re: (idm) re: cubase
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1999-03-22 03:56Joshua Reuven> ok - time to stand up for steinberg - i run cubase / wavelab on my pc - have > never had
From:
Joshua Reuven
To:
,
Date:
Sun, 21 Mar 1999 23:56:26 -0400
Subject:
(idm) re: cubase
permalink · <36F5BF6A.364B@erols.com>
quoted 4 lines ok - time to stand up for steinberg - i run cubase / wavelab on my pc - have> ok - time to stand up for steinberg - i run cubase / wavelab on my pc - have > never had any significant problems - they're generally much more stable than > most of the other apps i ever use, and when i have had problems i have found > the support staff in both the uk + the us to be pretty helpful
heh, that's because it's the best thing for the pc platform. the reason no mac users like it, is because there are infintely better programs for the mac. -joshua...
1999-03-25 01:18Mark KolmarTechnical music-making info, delete if uninterested. Just have to jump in here regarding C
From:
Mark Kolmar
To:
Joshua Reuven
Cc:
,
Date:
Wed, 24 Mar 1999 19:18:45 -0600 (CST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) re: cubase
Reply to:
(idm) re: cubase
permalink · <Pine.GSO.3.96.990324184716.20322D-100000@typhoon>
Technical music-making info, delete if uninterested. Just have to jump in here regarding Cubase, MIDI timing, Mac/Win, and whatnot... a. MIDI timing tests on LogicAudio were comparable on Mac and PC. The Atari is tighter for several reasons. Reports from users indicate MIDI timing and audio/MIDI sync with Cubase (on Mac or Win) are not as good as Logic. You can blame the OS in part, but also the app. b. Development of both Logic and Cubase are a little ahead on Mac. The next version of Logic for Windows is rewritten from the ground up to provide complete parity with the Mac version. Logic 4.0 will use the 32-bit timer, so it can be a fully 32-bit app. The 32-bit timer on Win98 is far superior to the 32-bit timer on Win95, enough so that Logic 4.0 will require Win98. Apparently the 32-bit timer on Win95 is so bad it could cause up to 500ms without any MIDI. Nobody seems to be sure whether Win98's 32-bit timer allows tighter MIDI than Win95's 16-bit timer. c. Latency and slop in MIDI devices themselves is an important issue. d. The MIDI features of DirectX can provide tighter MIDI timing, but I am not aware of any program that uses those facilities yet. --Mark __ Burning Rome : SENSELESS CD on Mindfield Records MindCD03 Cathartium 14 > Distributed by Dutch East India Trading, Com Four, and Carrot Top < < http://www.xnet.com/~mkolmar/BurningRome > < MP3 & RealAudio tracks > On Sun, 21 Mar 1999, Joshua Reuven wrote:
quoted 13 lines ok - time to stand up for steinberg - i run cubase / wavelab on my pc - have> > ok - time to stand up for steinberg - i run cubase / wavelab on my pc - have > > never had any significant problems - they're generally much more stable than > > most of the other apps i ever use, and when i have had problems i have found > > the support staff in both the uk + the us to be pretty helpful > > > heh, that's because it's the best thing for the pc platform. the reason > no mac users like it, is because there are infintely better programs for > the mac. > > > -joshua... >