179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) WAP numbering / Access dbase

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: (idm) wap numbering / access dbase · (idm) we are reasonable people
1998-07-03 19:21Edwin Wong (idm) We Are Reasonable People
└─ 1998-07-03 22:42Mark Stevens Re: (idm) We Are Reasonable People
└─ 1998-07-04 13:08Irene McC (idm) WAP numbering / Access dbase
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-07-03 19:21Edwin WongIn the Warp discography included with WARP, does anyone have any idea what WAP99 is? mitDR
From:
Edwin Wong
To:
Date:
Fri, 3 Jul 98 15:21:46 EDT
Subject:
(idm) We Are Reasonable People
permalink · <9807031921.AA04kit@kiwi.com>
In the Warp discography included with WARP, does anyone have any idea what WAP99 is? mitDR "Art". Something to do with Designers Republic -- but what? Greg (I think you were the one who mentioned this), the bottom of the commercial says WAP100CDP... -- Via DLG Pro v1.0 edwin_wong@kiwi.com // nothingrec@geocities.com Aphexweb // http://aphex.home.ml.org UnOfficial Nothing Records // http://destruction.home.ml.org
1998-07-03 22:42Mark StevensOn Fri, 3 Jul 98 15:21:46 EDT, you wrote: >In the Warp discography included with WARP, doe
From:
Mark Stevens
To:
Edwin Wong ,
Date:
Fri, 03 Jul 1998 22:42:34 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) We Are Reasonable People
Reply to:
(idm) We Are Reasonable People
permalink · <35a34e23.9606596@post.demon.co.uk>
On Fri, 3 Jul 98 15:21:46 EDT, you wrote:
quoted 4 lines In the Warp discography included with WARP, does anyone have any idea what>In the Warp discography included with WARP, does anyone have any idea what >WAP99 is? mitDR "Art". Something to do with Designers Republic -- but what? >Greg (I think you were the one who mentioned this), the bottom of the >commercial says WAP100CDP...
Wasn't WAP99 originally meant to be a Plaid single? And what's happened to WAP103? WAP102 was B12, WAP104 was Red Snapper. Will Plaid be moved into WAP103, or has that been reserved for the next Autechre single? And why the big gap between WARP56 (Red Snapper) and WARP66 (Autechre)? Ooh, WAP-Watchers! /\/)ark http://www.sonance.demon.co.uk/
1998-07-04 13:08Irene McCOn 3 Jul 98, Mark Stevens wrote > happened to WAP103? WAP102 was B12, WAP104 was Red Snapp
From:
Irene McC
To:
Date:
Sat, 4 Jul 1998 15:08:00 +0200
Subject:
(idm) WAP numbering / Access dbase
Reply to:
Re: (idm) We Are Reasonable People
permalink · <E0ysS1l-0005JA-00@smtp02.iafrica.com>
On 3 Jul 98, Mark Stevens wrote
quoted 2 lines happened to WAP103? WAP102 was B12, WAP104 was Red Snapper [...]> happened to WAP103? WAP102 was B12, WAP104 was Red Snapper [...] > And why the big gap between WARP56 (Red Snapper) and WARP66
Oh ! The headaches these things cause :-) On a slightly oblique side-street: does anyone use MicroSoft Access as a database? The Category ID field which gets allocated automatically by the programme has me totally baffled. I *know* it's just for the machine to find its way around and is _not_ a numbering system, but is there any way to recapture lost numbers in the running order? I did a filter and took out a batch and later re-instated them, blah blah - but now the Category ID jumps +- 95 numbers in the sequence. I * /// album titles we'll never see : Kraftwerk Unplugged