179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Irene McC
To:
Date:
Sat, 4 Jul 1998 15:08:00 +0200
Subject:
(idm) WAP numbering / Access dbase
Msg-Id:
<E0ysS1l-0005JA-00@smtp02.iafrica.com>
In-Reply-To:
<35a34e23.9606596@post.demon.co.uk>
Mbox:
idm.9807.gz
On 3 Jul 98, Mark Stevens wrote
quoted 2 lines happened to WAP103? WAP102 was B12, WAP104 was Red Snapper [...]> happened to WAP103? WAP102 was B12, WAP104 was Red Snapper [...] > And why the big gap between WARP56 (Red Snapper) and WARP66
Oh ! The headaches these things cause :-) On a slightly oblique side-street: does anyone use MicroSoft Access as a database? The Category ID field which gets allocated automatically by the programme has me totally baffled. I *know* it's just for the machine to find its way around and is _not_ a numbering system, but is there any way to recapture lost numbers in the running order? I did a filter and took out a batch and later re-instated them, blah blah - but now the Category ID jumps +- 95 numbers in the sequence. I * /// album titles we'll never see : Kraftwerk Unplugged