179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
subject “the aphex mystique” → 26 results
DateFromSubject
1994-02-2019:30Jon Drukman Re: The Aphex Mystique
>I'll just say that I don't see anyone who is…
1994-02-1816:12Mark Frazer Bower The Aphex Mystique
I think this guff about Mr James "making his own instruments" is…
1994-02-2205:17David P. Potosky Re: FSOL bashing (was Re: The Aphex Mystique)
I dont mean to jump on the FSOL bash bandwagon persay. While…
1994-02-2020:56Chris.Hilker Re: The Aphex Mystique
Harvey Thornburg writes: [The "experimental front"] > Not to mention B12 - although some…
1994-02-2022:56Jesse Dale Stricker Re: The Aphex Mystique
> On Sun, 20 Feb 1994, Jon Drukman wrote: > > >I'll just say…
1994-02-1819:58Mark Frazer Bower Re: The Aphex Mystique
|> |> I think this guff about Mr James "making his own instruments" is…
1994-02-2111:28Jeffrey Kihn Re: The Aphex Mystique
On Sun, 20 Feb 1994, Harvey Thornburg wrote: > Jeffrey Kihn wrote: > >
1994-02-1820:55Thomas C Butcher Re: The Aphex Mystique
> Enough gear talk, lets leave that to Analogue Heaven. So, where can…
1994-02-2105:12Skye Merlin Poier Re: The Aphex Mystique
And verily Jeffrey Kihn doth spake unto thee: > Interesting that the Orb…
1994-02-1817:50Jon Drukman Re: The Aphex Mystique
>ouch. harsh, jon, harsh. sorry, it's really early for me. >I…
1994-02-2211:56Roy Badami Re: FSOL bashing (was Re: The Aphex Mystique)
> I dont mean to jump on the FSOL bash bandwagon persay. > > While…
1994-02-2403:57the tiedyed side of the force Re: FSOL bashing (was Re: The Aphex Mystique)
>And what are your specific requirements for "D"? IMO, the "I" in…
1994-02-2019:58Jeffrey Kihn Re: The Aphex Mystique
On Sun, 20 Feb 1994, Jon Drukman wrote: > >I'll just say…
1994-02-2020:38Harvey Thornburg Re: The Aphex Mystique
Jeffrey Kihn wrote: > > > > On Sun, 20 Feb 1994, Jon Drukman wrote: > > >I…
1994-02-1820:42Thomas C Butcher Re: The Aphex Mystique
> I think this guff about Mr James "making his own instruments" is…
1994-02-2321:08Re: The Aphex Mystique -Reply
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Future Sound Of London. I agree. "Cascade" is very promising, and if…
1994-02-2400:45Pete Ashdown Re: The Aphex Mystique
> Alright, here we go. I agree that if any "techno" (if you…
1994-02-1817:15Jon Drukman Re: The Aphex Mystique
>I think this guff about Mr James "making his own instruments" is…
1994-02-2111:35Tai Nguyen FSOL bashing (was Re: The Aphex Mystique)
>OK, as long as we're lining all of the sacred cows…
1994-02-1817:45fEEd Re: The Aphex Mystique
> >given that we have so much raw sound material and so many…
1994-02-1905:02Jeffrey Kihn Re: The Aphex Mystique
> As long as we're all Aphex-bashing, I'll have to…
1994-02-2205:01Jeffrey Kihn Re: FSOL bashing (was Re: The Aphex Mystique)
> >Yorker_ sitting on my coffee table. As pretty and > >impressive as Dougans…
1994-02-2020:22Re: The Aphex Mystique
I don't think the orb suffer the same backlash as the…
1994-02-2418:52Re: The Aphex Mystique -Reply
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Alright, here we go. I agree that if any "techno" (if you…
1994-02-2116:36Dave Walker Re: The Aphex Mystique
On Sun, 20 Feb 1994, Jon Drukman wrote: > >I'll just say…
1994-02-2320:15Tai Nguyen Re: FSOL bashing (was Re: The Aphex Mystique)
Jeffrey Kihn, i n response to my comments: >> my sentiments exactly. amorph…