| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 2000-10-1617:54 | ian <ian@webice.net> | Re: [idm] kid a vs. homogenic, IDM, US >Who cares what label you put on it (besides some pretentious
>wankers… |
| 2000-10-1218:10 | alan r lucas <alucas@telerama.com> | [idm] kid a vs. homogenic if bjork's homogenic wasn't idm in 1997, then how the… |
| 2000-10-1418:13 | Mark Stevens <mark@headspin.clara.net> | Re: [idm] kid a vs. homogenic Here's a reply to the message "[idm] kid a vs. homogenic… |
| 2000-10-1218:21 | atomly <atomly@atomly.com> | Re: [idm] kid a vs. homogenic On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 11:29:50AM -0700, Ron Jeremy… |
| 2000-10-1617:05 | ian <ian@webice.net> | Re: [idm] kid a vs. homogenic, IDM, US >Here's a reply to the message "[idm] kid a vs. homogenic… |
| 2000-10-1218:29 | Ron Jeremy <galactic_funk@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] kid a vs. homogenic >From: alan r lucas |
| 2000-10-1617:49 | *!*! <miked@konfused.net> | Re: [idm] kid a vs. homogenic, IDM, US Who cares what label you put on it (besides some pretentious
wankers… |