| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 1996-02-0612:26 | Rob Thorley <rt2@st-andrews.ac.uk> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance On Sun, 4 Feb 1996, Che wrote:
Rock is (S)tatus (Q… |
| 1998-07-2700:27 | Rodney Perkins <rdperkins@earthlink.net> | (idm) Imbalance info? Can anyone provide info about Robert Henke's Imbalance imprint (i.e… |
| 1996-02-0203:46 | <transmat@teleport.com> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance >At 08:11 AM 01/02/96 -0800, transmat@teleport.com wrote… |
| 1998-05-2617:09 | Sean Cooper <scooper@best.com> | (idm) imbalance has anybody heard any of the releases on the basic channel/chain… |
| 1998-07-2700:55 | Lance C McGannon <mclance@nacs.net> | Re: (idm) Imbalance info? At 07:27 PM 7/26/98 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Can anyone… |
| 2024-08-2704:36 | Pietro <pietrobot@gmail.com> | Monolake :: Studio (Imbalance Computer Music) https://igloomag.com/reviews/monolake-studio-imbalance-computer-music
*There’s a… |
| 1996-02-0116:11 | <transmat@teleport.com> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance >> Chemical Brothers hard to find? That's disheartening
>
>And unbelievable too, since… |
| 2000-06-0616:57 | Intermodal <Chrome3@ix.netcom.com> | [idm] Imbalance Hello,
I am interested in the music on the BC sublabel Imbalance… |
| 1996-02-0202:06 | e r i k <ephillard@ucdavis.edu> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance >From: Erkki Rautio |
| 2000-06-0621:59 | Drusca <andrei@world.std.com> | Re: [idm] Imbalance : ruaridh : wrote:
> Re: Async Sense (Porter Rick's Andy Mellwig)
> ...
> one almost… |
| 1996-02-0302:21 | Rob Thorley <rt2@st-andrews.ac.uk> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance On Fri, 2 Feb 1996, Eylon Israeli wrote:
> And what is so… |
| 1996-02-0116:02 | Erkki Rautio <trerra@uta.fi> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance
> Chemical Brothers hard to find? That's disheartening
And unbelievable too, since… |
| 1996-02-0120:37 | ElmerFudd <Gavin@freenet.hut.fi> | RE: (idm) Chemical Imbalance
Who else thinks that the Bros have gotten away with an
ingenious… |
| 1996-02-0214:57 | Erkki Rautio <trerra@uta.fi> | Re: Hey, Hey, We Are The ChemBros! (was (Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance)
> > The Monkees were totally derided as a scam, it was rumoured they… |
| 2000-06-0717:35 | Drusca <andrei@world.std.com> | Re: [idm] Imbalance (I can't remember if this post ever went through yesterday, so… |
| 1996-02-0302:27 | Rob Thorley <rt2@st-andrews.ac.uk> | Re: Hey, Hey, We Are The ChemBros! (was (Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance) On Fri, 2 Feb 1996, Erkki Rautio wrote:
>
> > > The Monkees were totally… |
| 1996-02-0411:23 | Che <zeus8@synthcom.com> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance On Fri, 2 Feb 1996, Eylon Israeli wrote:
> And what is so… |
| 1996-02-0212:56 | Eylon Israeli <snowjob@actcom.co.il> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance At 11:38 AM 2/2/96 GMT, Hary J Walsh wrote… |
| 1996-02-0114:58 | Kent Williams <kent@inav.net> | (idm) Chemical Imbalance Chemical Brothers hard to find? That's disheartening -- because it
means that… |
| 1998-05-2621:16 | Lance C. McGannon <mclance@nacs.net> | Re: (idm) imbalance At 10:09 AM 5/26/98 -0700, you wrote:
>
>has anybody… |
| 1996-02-0212:27 | Eylon Israeli <snowjob@actcom.co.il> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance At 06:06 PM 2/1/96 -0800, e r i k… |
| 1996-02-0317:10 | Eylon Israeli <snowjob@actcom.co.il> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance At 02:21 AM 2/3/96 +0000, Rob Thorley wrote:
>On… |
| 1996-02-0216:49 | Paul Middleton <pmiddlet@nla.gov.au> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance
----------
>From: idm-owner
>To: kent
>Cc: idm
>Subject: Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance… |
| 1998-07-2806:45 | Sean Cooper <scooper@best.com> | (idm) Re: imbalance >>Can anyone provide info about Robert Henke's Imbalance imprint (i.e… |
| 1996-02-0201:56 | MadDog Mgt. <maddog@passport.ca> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance At 08:11 AM 01/02/96 -0800, transmat@teleport.com wrote… |
| 2000-06-0620:03 | <Cesium5Hz@aol.com> | [idm] Imbalance In a message dated 7/06/00 1:19:19 W. Australia… |
| 1996-02-0420:38 | Eylon Israeli <snowjob@actcom.co.il> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance At 11:23 AM 2/4/96 +0000, Che wrote:
>On Fri… |
| 1996-02-0201:44 | <AWerks2@aol.com> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance Who else thinks that the Bros have gotten away with an
>ingenious… |
| 1996-02-0211:38 | Hary J Walsh <hwalsh@drlove.ilo.dec.com> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance _> do with it. So if it takes someone like the Chemical Brothers… |
| 2000-06-0617:38 | : ruaridh : <thevillageorchestra@hotmail.com> | [idm] Imbalance Someone posted enquiring about the Imbalance label; as i'm sitting at… |
| 1996-02-0217:07 | Kent Williams <kent@inav.net> | Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance Summary of the thread thus far:
1. Chemical Brother suck
2. Josh… |
| 1996-02-0213:56 | Erkki Rautio <trerra@uta.fi> | Hey, Hey, We Are The ChemBros! (was (Re: (idm) Chemical Imbalance)
> >The ChemBros are The Monkees of techno, though I
> >actually liked the… |