| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 1997-02-2421:01 | pHACEpHLANGEpHACEpHLANGEpHACEpHLANGEpHACEpHLANGEpHACEpHLANGEpHACEpHLANGEpHACEpHLANGEpHACEpHLANGEpHACEpHLANGEpHACEpHLANGEpHACEpHLANGEpHACEpHLANGEpHACEpHLANGEpHACEpHLANGEpHACEfizzog <Richard@afx.idiscover.co.uk> | Re: (idm) Digital Reproduction it woUld be wicked if u couLd get a program to tell… |
| 1997-02-2507:32 | collin strange <strange@pipeline.com> | Re: (idm) Digital Reproduction >it woUld be wicked if u couLd get a program to tell… |
| 1997-02-2501:28 | Eric Frans <franse@engr.arizona.edu> | RE: (idm) Digital Reproduction On Mon, 24 Feb 1997, Chris Fahey wrote:
} With digital technology, it… |
| 1997-02-2420:53 | Chris Fahey <chris@wanderlust.com> | RE: (idm) Digital Reproduction I don't need a machine to do jiggery pokery, sir!
Speaking… |
| 1997-02-2416:08 | Chris Fahey <chris@wanderlust.com> | RE: (idm) Digital Reproduction "Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" was in my opinion replaced… |