| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 1998-02-1121:29 | Steve Hanlon <velure@computerdiscounters.com> | Re: (idm) Can, etc. speaking of ege bam....
anyone remember the 12in from a few years… |
| 1998-02-1210:22 | Michael James <mikej@clearcut.co.uk> | Re: (idm) Can, etc. Steve Hanlon wrote:
> speaking of ege bam....
>
> anyone remember the 12in from… |
| 1998-02-1120:54 | Matt Cuttler <mc0189@cnsvax.albany.edu> | Re: (idm) Can, etc.
Weavers, Simon wrote:
> I was looking through some papers, and came across… |
| 1998-02-1120:17 | Weavers, Simon <simon.weavers@aspenpubl.com> | (idm) Can, etc. I was looking through some papers, and came across a note from… |
| 1998-02-1122:53 | Matt Cuttler <mc0189@cnsvax.albany.edu> | Re: (idm) Can, etc.
steve /k/./F/ wrote:
> although Carl is definately the man...actually ...no… |
| 1998-02-1212:01 | Erkki Rautio <trerra@uta.fi> | Re: (idm) Can, etc.
About Can, my advice is: stick to the originals.
If you don… |
| 1998-02-1120:53 | steve /k/./F/ <kung.funk@virgin.net> | Re: (idm) Can, etc. > > I was looking through some papers, and came across a note from… |
| 1998-02-1122:55 | William D. VanLoo <wdvanloo@mtu.edu> | Re: (idm) Can, etc. > > although Carl is definately the man...actually ...no.... Carl USED to be… |
| 1998-02-1123:35 | steve /k/./F/ <kung.funk@virgin.net> | Re: (idm) Can, etc. > > > although Carl is definately the man...actually ...no.... Carl USED
> to be… |