179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
... hellothisisalex ...
To:
IDM List
Date:
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 23:45:24 -0400
Subject:
[idm] IDM concerts
Msg-Id:
<000c01c1e754$a3e138c0$763c6480@trinity.toronto.edu>
Mbox:
idm.0204.gz
Hello, As a performer this is the kind of question that seems to pop into my own head every once and a while--what can I do that is entertaining for myself and the audience but allows me to create and perform electronic music in a live setting? Something that occurred to me recently was how much of this debate over 'live' performance rests on expectations carried over from rock and pop (and hiphop) concerts into electronic shows. It seems that the more successful shows in IDM draw on resources from outside IDM to make their shows engaging. But could it be that there is something about that use of computer that alienates people? A computer is a two way connection between a person and a machine, with both interacting (to some degree) with each other. The computer is designed to demand your attention in a manner so wholly different from that of most other instruments that it almost seems as though the audience is left out of the equation. Perhaps the audience feels that the performer isn't really 'there' as in engaging the audience, etc. So maybe this is a question of presence and absence--how much presence is demanded of the performer? I would say that 99.9% the presence required depends on the setting. Some people don't like to dance and would rather listen. Some performers would rather have people listen than dance. For example: the Autechre show mentioned; Radiohead has been known to ask people to not mosh at shows, etc. There is apparently a two-way communication between the audience and the performer to be maintained, and maybe the problem at a lot of IDM shows is that the audience isn't sure what the performer expects of them, and vice versa. I would say that musicians writing music for listening are asking people to listen, whether they like that or not. The audience doesn't have to comply, but they are being asked. If a performer is engaging the audience in a blatant manner (ala Cex), the audience knows they are being engaged. I don't have any answers to this solution, but I would also say that it can be disheartening for some musicians when the audience doesn't understand the 'unwritten rules' of a performance. All performances have them (picture Cat Power playing to an audience--should the audience listen quietly or jump about madly because they are so driven?) and some performances maybe just need to articulate them better. The first step I think I would take if I was a laptop artist would be to not perform raised up on a stage or in a position to be watched. Beyond that, I have no idea. cheers Mark & Melissa hellothisisalex www.hellothisisalex.com / records.hellothisisalex.com mp3s at www.raw42.com/cgi-bin/featuredartist.pl?artist=213 mark@hellothisisalex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org