179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Brian M. Cass
To:
Lukas Bergstrom
Cc:
idm doesn't stand for anything, dammit
Date:
Tue, 8 May 2001 23:43:28 -0600 (MDT)
Subject:
Re: [idm] list administration idea
Msg-Id:
<Pine.LNX.4.33.0105082342490.7027-100000@boardwalk.nmt.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<01ac01c0d844$0a735440$1600000a@diablo>
Mbox:
idm.0105.gz
If a moderated list is gonna be made, I want my list to moderated so that all Plaid references are excised. On Wed, 9 May 2001, Lukas Bergstrom wrote:
quoted 21 lines I can't imagine unsubscribing from idm, no matter how poor the signal to> I can't imagine unsubscribing from idm, no matter how poor the signal to > noise ratio gets. I just get info here I don't get anywhere else. However, > sometimes it's worse than other times. > How about a dual-level list? You subscribe to either idm or idm-m > (moderated). All posts would show up on idm, like always, but only approved > posts would end up on idm-m. > Everyone's happy: if you hate the idea of moderation, stay on idm, you won't > miss anything, nothing changes for you. If politics and movies aren't your > thing, move to idm-m. > > I know moderation has been discussed and rejected before, but since this > could be implemented without changing idm@hyperreal at all, well...whaddaya > think? > > Lukas > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org