179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Brian M. Cass
To:
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 10 Apr 2001 21:19:09 -0600 (MDT)
Subject:
[idm] Re: Cornfield; was Crunch
Msg-Id:
<Pine.LNX.4.33.0104102117190.28712-100000@boardwalk.nmt.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<200104102111.QAA24840@ionet.net>
Mbox:
idm.0104.gz
HOLY SMOKES This guy blasts ae then goes on to laud Plaid? Plaid whose two cds are nearly indistinguishable from each other and are very very similar to their black dog stuff?!?!?!? Plaid who don't really have an inventive, avant garde bone in their body? On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 muziq@ionet.net wrote:
quoted 18 lines ...are much more> > ...are much more > > interesting, and Confield should top them all. > > Because? > > I've been listening to the white labels for a bit, and while COnfield is in > that progression Ae has been on about over the last few years, don't go for the > future-tense hype. Booth and Brown know they've been crawling further up their > own asses with each release, and Confield is just a few folds deeper. Fewer > crunchy pubic hair sounds, lots more colonic bass :) > > Leave all the glowing hype for the more mainstream media, who will be so > confused by Confield that they laud it a masterpiece. > > Want to talk interesting, talk the new Plaid. > > Laz >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org