179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
bloat
To:
Date:
Wed, 17 Feb 1999 19:40:40 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) nothing changes and no not that other compilation
Msg-Id:
<Pine.LNX.4.04.9902171936530.334-100000@slothrop>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.BSI.3.95.990217104213.1315A-100000@we1.web-elite.com>
Mbox:
idm.9902.gz
Nah, I'm with Greg on this one. The guy made a fully lame comment accusing Warp of cashing in, when in fact they, and Evolution, had done us all a favour by releasing an album of nearly impossible to find early cuts from GC. CheerioAndrewC.
quoted 20 lines You know I'm not sure as to Greg's status on this list; he seems to float> You know I'm not sure as to Greg's status on this list; he seems to float > in and out, conveniently chiming in whenever anyone posts anything less > than stellar about Warp. Now if you're reading this Greg I'm not saying > > On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Greg Eden wrote: > > > > > > >is there anyone out there besides me who thinks this comp is kind > > >of.... > > >pointless and mediocre? > > > > > >after you get past the versions of tracks that were already available > > >elsewhere (antacid, arcadian, amenity, biosphere), what you have left > > >is a bunch of demos and farting around (literally, in the case of "...peter > > >cook") by the evolution roster. > > > > > >i've always counselled people to avoid this warp cash-in and seek out > > >the host of good records that the evolution guys put out their own and > > >other labels. > >