quoted 17 lines I didn't mean to insinuate that the original poster is sexist. That is
> I didn't mean to insinuate that the original poster is sexist. That is
> absurd. But referring to the "women in IDM" in the following terms, well,
> could be opening yourself up for something (?)
>
> Brian Tang writes:
> >We haven't seemed to had then women-in-idm thread in
> >awhile, maybe someone would like to bring that beast out of the
> >closet again.),
>
> Fred Guy writes:
> >>and then it usually flares into some tangent socioeconomic philosophy
> chatter
>
> Chatter? Why not just call it mindless prattle, while you roll your eyes?
> William S. Burroughs was discussed at some length here. So was
> Intellectual Property Rights. Why are these topics not considered
> "chatter?"
yes they are in my opinion. The "Women-in-IDM" thread really
inspires some ultra-brainlessness though. don't know why that is.
But anyway it seems that they there are two camps in this mailing
list. People who are busy and would like to keep the posts about
music. And People who would like to discuss whatever comes up. I'm
in the former camp. There are plenty of outlets to discuss sexism in
our culture and intellectual property rights. It's not the focus of
this group, and it sometimes annoys me to have to wade throught these
posts. Although it was equally annoying wading throught the "is chem
bros. and/or prodigy appropiate to discuss here." If someone wants
to post a review of an albumn I'm fine with that. It's just the
ensuing reply's that really bother me. (I know I'm shooting myself
in the foot, with this reply).
Please forgive me for bringing up the "women-in-idm" thread. It's
spawned a meta-thread. Do youse peeps have it in your heart to
forgive me??
ObIdm::
_Cold Krush Cuts_. Love this compilation. Pulled it out after being
shelved for a couple monthes. The DJ Krush side is so phat!
freshie
Paranoia: The choice of a Tech Generation
http://silly.com/~tang